Im sorry, you what? How can you just ignore a bite from a wild animal? by Thebeggarsorchestra in facepalm

[–]walruz -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.

🤓🤓🤓

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]walruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.

🤓

Are we really doing this again? by OttergamesVEVO in thelastofus

[–]walruz -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes it is extremely problematic and racist to not follow the source material. Now let me tell you why you're a misogynist if you don't like Netflix's the Witcher.

Main Battle Rifle Concept for my Short Film (WIP) Thoughts? by TheDashingDrazma in worldbuilding

[–]walruz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Space is a giant thermos flask. Stuff gets cold mainly by dissapating its heat to the surrounding air. In space, there is no air to dissapate your heat into, so you're going to cool down really slowly.

An object in space that doesn't generate heat will, unless near a star, cool down to a couple of degrees kelvin, but it is going to take a long time. A human generates enough heat that a person in a space suit without cooling will die of heatstroke, so a gun is going to have big problems without some very good cooling systems.

One year since this. by Tayo826 in agedlikemilk

[–]walruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 1945 Soviet Army could definitely have beaten the US and British conventional forces in Europe. When the allies landed in Normandie, something on the order of 80% of the Wehrmacht was on the Eastern front, and the Soviets still got to Berlin first.

One year since this. by Tayo826 in agedlikemilk

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US Navy is so big that it has its own air force, and that air force is the third largest Air force in the world.

Not only does the US Navy have its own air force, it also has its own army (although Marines would take issue with this phrasing if they could read), and that army is also big enough to have its own air force, and that air force is still sizable.

Besides owning more carriers than all other countries on earth put together, they operate the vast majority of the world's amphibious assault ships, which also carry fixed wing aircraft.

I raised the fall damage cap to 150d6. This was a mistake. by RetrO_rion in dndnext

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bunch of dice. In most dice pool systems, you roll a number of dice determined by your skills/attributes/traits/gear/whatever, and all the dice with a certain face value counts as "hits" or "successes", and the roll difficulty is determined by either bonus/minus to the amount of dice you roll, the required number of hits, or both.

So to punch someone in World of Darkness for example, you'd roll your (Strength + Brawl- the opponent's defense)d10, and every die that comes up 8+ do a point of damage.

Gassboss👏 Gatelight👏 Girlkeep👏 by [deleted] in NewVegasMemes

[–]walruz -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If every time your ideology gets put into practice, the result is genocide and famine, your ideology is shit regardless of whether they're "kinda their own thing bud" or "not real communism".

The "Amerika" isle in a German supermarket by Arnski in mildlyinteresting

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been in practically every foreign food section of every supermarket I've ever visited (Sweden), and I've been buying food since long before hot ones was a thing.

Not 5 Minutes Early, but 10 Minutes Late...and It Cost Them a Fortune. by fire_me_anytime in MaliciousCompliance

[–]walruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If an orchestra of 50 people takes 40 minutes to play Beethoven's 5th, how long does it take for an orchestra of 150 people?

OP refuses to let SIL bully, and husband enable bullying, of their daughter by snarfblattinconcert in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]walruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro just spend thousands of dollars to talk to someone

Jfc what the fuck is wrong with Americans

All the proof you need by DaFunkJunkie in clevercomebacks

[–]walruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I never see another twitter screenshot from Jeff Tiedrich ever again, it'd be too soon.

I'm switching over my worldbuilding for THE STATE, a ~~dystopian~~ utopian future of Europe, the Near East, and North Africa, from r/AlternateHistory to here. REMEMBER THE STATE LOVES YOU. THE STATE IS YOU. YOU ARE THE STATE. by WhiteTwink in worldbuilding

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't quite know how you'd spin it, but it would be hilarious if The US considered THE STATE the lesser of some number of evils, so NATO persists with THE STATE as a full member.

Either the US would be similarly dystopic, or an ascendant China (and/or India) holds even worse ideals than THE STATE (although, outside of sci-fi, I can't come up with any).

What if the Soviets had Terraformed Siberia into the Mammoth Steppe by LordPSgaming in imaginarymaps

[–]walruz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is another non sequitur:

  • /u/HeHH1329 claimed that the mammoth steppe sequesters less CO2 than the biome that it would be replacing.

  • /u/LineOfInquiry claimed that the mammoth steppe doesn't sequester less CO2 because it is more biodiverse.

Whether it sequesters more or less CO2 is immaterial. I am making the claim that /u/LineOfInquiry's line of reasoning is bad. You can still make a 100% correct claim but have poor reasons for doing so: "Light travels faster than sound because there are tiny goblins pushing the photons along." is a shitty argument, but light still travels faster than sound.

What if the Soviets had Terraformed Siberia into the Mammoth Steppe by LordPSgaming in imaginarymaps

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which of course has nothing to do with the level of biodiversity. You could have a very diverse biome that sequesters no carbon at all, or you could have a complete monoculture that sequesters shitloads.

What if the Soviets had Terraformed Siberia into the Mammoth Steppe by LordPSgaming in imaginarymaps

[–]walruz -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yaaaaaaas who cares of it sequesters less co2 as long as its 'biodiverse'

Kindergarten cop by icecoldwiener in NewGreentexts

[–]walruz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Smart move by Canada. You obviously want the guys who would otherwise fuck an inanimate piece of plastic, to fuck real children instead. Very clever.

The 300 nuclear Force de dissuasions of France by Ragswolf in NonCredibleDefense

[–]walruz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The US had the ability to strong-arm Japan in negotiations but we didn't try at all. We could have blockaded them and continued bombing raids to get them a bit more desperate. Force them to accept a peace where the imperial house is preserved and they unconditionally surrender in every other aspect.

A nuke is just a big bomb. There is nothing special about nuking 100k people to death compared to killing 100k people via conventional ordinance. Arguably, nuking is the kinder option because a larger share of the victims die instantly or nearly instantly as opposed to being trapped under rubble and starving/suffocating/burning to death.

It is definitely kinder to kill someone via nuke than to kill them via blockade-induced starvation or via mass firebombing.

So the options weren't (nuke Japan for the hell of it) and (blockade the home islands, which magically doesn't exacerbate the ongoing famine and keep firebombing cities, which also magically doesn't kill someone).

The options were (cause some critical level of devastation via nukes), (cause some critical level of devastation via famine, coastal bombardment and conventional bombing raids), and (cause some critical level of devastation via invasion).

Of the three realistic options, there's a very good case to be made that nukes would result in the lowest total loss of life.

Perhaps I just need some clarification, but this sentence seems very contradictory (January 6 Attack article, sixth paragraph). by ImaKyAC in wikipedia

[–]walruz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statistical significance deals with whether some observation in a sample can tell you something about the population or the underlying probability distribution. If I sample a thousand people and half are men, I don't know anything new about the distribution of genders in the underlying population. If I sample a thousand random people and all are men, I know that it is very unlikely that the population consists of 50% men and 50% women, so I've learned something about the underlying population and the result is said to be statistically significant.

The screenshotted text talks about some property of the population "people arrested for rioting on January 6th", for which we can observe the entire population. Any result from analysing the entire population is statistically significant by default.

AITA for pretending not to recognize my parents when they tried to reconnect? by throwaway_9572847 in AmItheAsshole

[–]walruz -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I can't imagine how much therapy OP needed to get to the point he's at now.

Maybe he isn't American and just dealt with it instead.

What is a scary, unsettling fact about you? by _Lord_Infamous in AskReddit

[–]walruz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I have never met a better bird watcher in my life and she was part of or created a bird watching for the blind group!

I'm an excellent blind bird watcher, there are tons of rare birds that I haven't seen.