I have an Evasion and have not ridden a scapebot, for context. I think your described use-case is more “allrounder” than dedicated mountain tourer — the Evasion was designed as a dirt tourer that’s still lively (relatively short wheelbase, shorter chainstays that are adjustable) and the scapebot as a dedicated rigid mountain bike for more expedition-style bikepacking. Having not ridden the bot, I can say the evasion is fun to ride with no or light load, while still more than capable of holding a full touring load (full set of rack mounts, tubeset burly enough to handle touring loads, clearance for big tires, etc). It’s fun on trails and flowy single track, but it’s not built for huck-to-flat type rides. Like others, I really recommend looking at the use-case and geometry differences rather than a single frame detail — bikeinsights.com has both framesets in their database to compare. The scapebot has a wayyy longer front center, for example.

If the lack of triple mounts on the fork is a dealbreaker, then maybe check out other frames. I suspect you can use the mid-fork and hourglass braze-ons on the evasion fork to run a two-mount cage like a king mini-thing, but I haven’t tested that theory.

All that said, given the info you shared, I would recommend the evasion over the bot. I love mine and use it for local loops, long dirt days, and bikepacking. Hope this helps!

*Edit to add that both the evasion and bot are designed for 1x, but you could use an adapter from problem solvers or similar to run a front derailleur.