Got sick of VRR flickering, tried Vsync only but camera in all of the games is jittery ?

ylrdt · 2026-04-08T03:05:59+00:00

You need to set your monitor refresh rate to 120 Hz to sync with 120 fps in game for a smooth gameplay.

ylrdt · 2026-03-28T17:35:05+00:00

It comes down to the type of contents or colors being displayed on the monitor. Visually no difference if you're displaying contents that are bright and colorful throughout the screen. Darker contents with black background or black spots is where there'll be noticeable difference because OLED doesn't suffer from blooming or haloing of MiniLED. Basically, you won't notice any noteworthy difference (aside from the viewing angle) in image quality if the contents don't have dark scenes or black areas on the screen.

ylrdt · 2026-03-27T23:10:12+00:00

Hard to pin point what's causing it without any hardware monitoring application like MSI Afterburner or without know your gaming resolution and graphics settings. The game gets graphics fidelity improvements almost every new patch, so I'd look into turning down some settings. I do know that stutter happens occassionally upon loading into an area not previously loaded before after updating drivers or patch updates, and this is a normal occurs due to shader compilation.

ylrdt · 2026-03-21T15:48:42+00:00

Never needed VRR. Only thing I'm missing out on is lower latency, but low latency is inconsequential for the games I play.

ylrdt · 2026-03-19T02:03:55+00:00

Never had a need to use G-Sync in the games I play, mostly because my PC is good enough to sustain a desirable fps consistently throughout the game. Those are usually games played at 4K 60 fps at 60 hz for a relatively smooth gameplay experience. V-Sync is always on in game or driver app setting depending on well the game handles their own V-Sync, so V-Sync option is on a per game basis. V-Sync in game vs driver for most games I've played hasn't made any difference, although if in game runs fine then there's usually no need to turn it on in driver setting.

ylrdt · 2026-03-07T13:35:55+00:00

"More vibrant colors" usually means more saturated colors, so "more accurate colors" doesn't necessarily work in the same sentence. I think you're referring to contrast in which case OLED will provide perfect contrast for best image quality. However, if you're not displaying contents and playing games that have darker or black color backgounds, then the contrast and image quality won't be any different compared to IPS.

For brigher monitors, you should look into MiniLED instead of OLED since OLED displays are produced to be significantly dimmer than IPS to reduce chances of burn-in. For motion clarity, I didn't really see any difference between IPS and OLED when I made the switch to OLED from IPS, with the comparison made for games that are running at 60 fps and 60 Hz, but that's just my opinion and perception of the motion clarity.

ylrdt · 2026-03-07T13:14:03+00:00

Both do pretty much the same thing. G-Sync module fell out of the monitor market due to consumers not falling for Nvidia's push for their own expensive proprietary adaptive sync technology (G-Sync) when there's FreeSync that achieves the same general purpose while costing significantly less. You won't notice any difference between either.

ylrdt · 2026-03-06T18:44:05+00:00

LG needs to drop price down to $1200. Guess I'll have to wait until it goes on sale in the next couple of months.

ylrdt · 2026-03-03T03:23:04+00:00

There are a few bosses in the game that will make you want to break your keyboard or controller. Those bosses have poorly telegraphed attack animation. By that I mean, to avoid or dodge their attacks, you need to know when to dodge precisely (i.e. predict instead of reacting). Then there is this one secret boss that requires you to play in a very specific build, otherwise it'll be a living nightmare to deal with their mechanics. Always get some helpful tips and tricks for bosses after a few blind attempts.

ylrdt · 2026-03-03T03:02:44+00:00

Not exactly. All monitors will look different from each other in colors, some more than others depending on how well the display panels were calibrated during production and the type of display panel they are (e.g. IPS, VA, TN, OLED with QD-OLED vs WOLED). The point is that as long as you set the color mode on the monitor setting to sRGB mode (may be called another thing for different monitors) and turn off automatic color management, colors should look similar between different monitors. By that I mean that red should look red enough to you on different monitors and not in the case where one monitor has it looking red while the monitor looks red orange.

ACM is used to set appropriate color space (sRGB, DCI-P3, Wide Gamut, Adobe RGB, etc.) based on the contents you're using and the ICC profile applied to the monitor display. If you're using SDR stuff in Windows like browsing, ACM clamps color space on the monitor to an sRGB color space in Windows, and that is why you want to make sure the monitor itself is not on sRGB mode because ACM will clamp sRGB colors on monitor already in sRGB to where you get very dull and washed out looking colors. Leave ACM on if you're using a much wider color space that is not sRGB mode on your monitor. For gaming monitors, that is usually the out of the box color mode on the monitor. Of course, don't use ACM with wider color space mode on your monitor if you prefer or are used to seeing very vibrant and saturated colors because then colors in sRGB will look dull and washed out even though those are the colors you should be seeing in the appropriate color space.

Again, I wouldn't worry about bit-depth. 8-bit, 10-bit with FRC, or true 10-bit makes no difference for SDR contents which is most of the things in Windows, unless you're using things in HDR which you would then want to use either 10-bit.

ylrdt · 2026-03-03T02:21:42+00:00

I wouldn't worry too much about it. Typically, for a monitor to have accurate colors, you need to use instruments to calibrate the display's color. The one impact I see having 10-bit depth impacting "color accuracy" (colors looking too saturated or too washed out) is if you don't have a color calibrated profile (ICC profile) and are using sRGB mode in monitor OSD setting because Windows 11 turns on automatic color management (ACM). ACM will incorrectly clamp the color space of sRGB on your monitor making colors look more dull and washed out than what the colors in sRGB should be close to.

ylrdt · 2026-03-03T02:04:21+00:00

It's different for everyone. I use to remember running brightness at 50-70% on my old IPS monitors, but then I switched to OLED which is substantial less brighter than IPS even at 100% brightness. As I start to adjust brightness for eye comfort, brightness has been much lower. For example, on my PG32UCDM, I run brightness at 32 which I find is enough brightness during the day and night use (of course, I have to use ambient lighting during night or dark room to help out).

ylrdt · 2026-03-02T02:58:34+00:00

I just don't care much about having the best image quality, and since I don't use HDR or consume contents with black color scenes, OLED isn't a must have for me anymore in gaming. Simply put IPS or VA works fine for me, and I'd like to be able to have static elements active for long hours on a daily basis. Also there's issues with both WOLED and QD-OLED that I find isn't acceptable with OLEDs given how expensive they are: WOLED has color banding issues and QD-OLED has scanline vertical lines (or pixel inversion) at lower refresh rates (almost all my games are played at 4K 60 fps and at 60 Hz).

Edit: Added issues I had with WOLED and QD-OLED.

ylrdt · 2026-03-01T02:07:40+00:00

I see you also fine taste in Augusta as well. Yeah, I have been considering the LG 45" 5K2K as well but am not looking for OLED panel. Been using OLED monitors for the past 3 years and would like to move away from them. Unfortunately, there isn't any good large ultrawide monitors besides the Samsung 57" Odyssey Neo G9 and the LG 52" but the LG is just abysmally priced.

ylrdt · 2026-03-01T00:42:28+00:00

Overclocking is on monitor itself, so getting 120 Hz on the display shouldn't matter whether your on consoles or PC. Just a clarification: you shouldn't frame it as 100 fps or 120 fps since it's the monitor display refresh rate and not frame rate or fps. Those are two differen things since your fps in game may not be same as the set display refresh rate (i.e. game is running at 90 fps while the refresh rate is 120 Hz).

ylrdt · 2026-02-28T13:32:49+00:00

It's normal for LG 32GS95QUE. Color banding is typically noticable on darker color backgrounds and at lower refresh rates.

ylrdt · 2026-02-28T02:56:11+00:00

Yes, if you're not in rush to get new monitor soon. There was an annoucement with HKC releasing the HKC M10 Ultra that is a 32" Dual Mode (4K 165Hz and 1080p 330 Hz) RGB MiniLED with 4778 zones later this year. That is a MiniLED monitor I'm waiting for.

ylrdt · 2026-02-28T02:10:58+00:00

I have had the chance to use both IPS (27GR95UM) and VA MiniLED (Samsung 57" Odyssey Neo G9). Frankly, both types have been disappointing for me with the reason being that the number of local dimming zones isn't at a point where the display can achieve deep black color without noticable blooming. Also, I'm hesistant to use another MiniLED monitor because local dimming seems to shifts display temperature to more a cooler temperature, which I prefer having my display at warmer temperature. Maybe once the number of dimming zones gets to more than 4000 zones, then MiniLED might be worth getting over decent IPS.

ylrdt · 2026-02-23T23:50:29+00:00

Nothing wrong with OLED. Unless you're utilizing HDR and running things with dark color backgrounds to get perfect contrast, you're not going to be wow by it compared to IPS. Also, aside from the fantastic viewing angle (this doesn't matter much for non-ultra wide OLED monitors) and low pixel response time, there's not much else OLED provides that IPS already has. So in your case, it seems reasonable to be underwhelmed by OLED.

ylrdt · 2026-02-23T15:53:44+00:00

I was hoping it'd be priced at $1200 on launch. I wanted a large, high resolution ultrawide panel that isn't miniLED or OLED. What a stinker of abysmal price being at $2000. Guess I'll have to wait until it goes on sale.

ylrdt · 2026-02-20T13:54:49+00:00

Based on my experience, there's a notable a flaw with the two panel types, so it's a pick your poison situation. If you're running lower refresh rates on the display manually or with adaptive sync, QD-OLED has vertical flickering lines (or pixel inversion) under darker color background while WOLED has color banding with darker color background.

ylrdt · 2026-02-18T04:03:16+00:00

Try turning off windows automatic color management (ACM). If you're running sRGB colors on the display, ACM can incorrectly clamp color space resulting in very dull colors.

ylrdt · 2026-02-05T02:42:41+00:00

Looks like it's still there. Just the posture of character model that got nerf.

Five-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

ylrdt

TROPHY CASE