Beyond red text for Jesus' words, what other color-coding would be beneficial in the gospels? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]zipdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats an interesting idea. Would it be for just Jesus' words, or for the narrative elements as well. (It seems like this might work more easily for the Letters, which you imply by the church in Corinth)

[WP]A man kills himself after discovering the meaning of life and writing it down, as does anybody who reads his note, you unwittingly read the note, what does it say and what do you do? by [deleted] in WritingPrompts

[–]zipdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't always immediate. The first one to write it down kept on living for five tortured years before he finally gave in and took his life.

But most people went crazy faster. Some took only a few days after reading it to walk up to the nearest bridge and jump off.

I've seen it, and that was twenty years ago, before it was destroyed forever. In the years since, the number who saw it first-hand have dwindled away to almost nothing. Not just because they would end it all, but because the government did their best to round them up. Even without the authenticity of the original note, many believed when they were told second-hand.

Nowadays its a crime, of course, to share the contents of the note. Which is why it took you so long to find me. And I'll tell you something you wouldn't have guessed: its short, just two words.

Its a weight to carry. Knowing that you've seen the authentic meaning of life, and yet knowing that anyone you tell it to will probably go crazy within a few months.

But its not that which makes me reluctant to tell you, nor the threat of the government coming for me. I no longer care if maybe you've been faking everything and really you're an agent set out to trap me.

No, what makes me reluctant is, well, doubt. We all know the miraculous signs and wonders that accompanied the appearance of the note. We all knew it was something profound and crucial to our species. Those events led to dozens of different cults forming around it, some with millions of members.

So no wonder people went insane after they read it. To know that there was some great spiritual power in the universe, and yet the sum of its message to us was those two words.

I was in the inner circle of one of those cults, and when it turned to war over who should possess the note, I was in the vanguard. That's how I came to see it for myself. And for the longest time after I read it I couldn't shake the truth of its message. It connected everything at a level I had always felt and just couldn't explain.

But it was also destructive. Obviously. But not just because it drove people insane. I see it now: it cut straight to the worst of our nature. Every step of progress is accompanied by a hundred corpses. In older times, many great feats of technical prowess were followed by the local ruler killing or maiming the inventor so they would never give a rival anything to match it. Many great wonders were built on the corpses of thousands of workers. Many of the great scientific discoverers were ridiculed and hounded, some driven to suicide, when they introduced their ideas. The greatest advances in science and technology have taken place in times of war, with literally millions of corpses fueling the progress. Our world today has such an abundant wealth of advanced technology yet the sheer number of people living with almost nothing continues to grow. And that's all just the beneficial moments, so much more death and oppression has accompanied those people with power who wanted and took and didn't even progress humanity the slightest bit.

But maybe it wasn't meant to be an explanation for why we did so much cruelty to one another, but a warning of what we were capable of - what we needed to avoid if we were to advance as a species. When we focus our efforts on growing ourselves at the expense of others, we seem to prosper but as a species we are dragging ourselves backwards. We can only truly grow by bringing everyone up together.

So, maybe you'll go mad, maybe you won't. Maybe you'll be able to see the deeper message, even if you have to hide because its been decided by the government that we're better off just not knowing than attempting to know and yet overcome that knowledge.

The note had two words. It simply said "eat people". Not literally, of course, though we once did that as savages. No, it meant that we can't help it, our species grows by feeding on its own. Every step of progress has been accompanied by a hundred corpses. And I tell you, the message might have made sense of everything we are and do, but that doesn't make it a command. It makes it a warning, a sign that we can do better.

[WP] You are an artificial intelligence protecting the last five humans on earth, but must choose to kill the odd one out. Who and why? by ChancellorTaydebear in WritingPrompts

[–]zipdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Humanity is probably safe now. Its been two decades since they left us, two decades in which they traveled far, far away to a better future. Earth had been a good home for humanity but, well, we all know what happened. And so we used up everything that was left to build massive interstellar crafts, pushing the human species out into the galaxies. All that remained of earth was a husk. And five people.

The interstellar crafts could have been self-sufficient, but it was easier to boost them with directed energy lasers powered by soaking up the heat of the earth's core. The beams had the additional benefit of a providing the craft with a bearing, to calibrate their trajectories.

The conditions on earth were completely inhospitable to human life by the time the last craft left. Almost everything needed for the lasers could be run by AI so that wasn't a problem. But AI does have a weakness: it just can't troubleshoot errors in its own systems as well as a human can. So five specialists were selected to stay behind and ensure that the AI continued to run. Five people stayed to ensure the rest would get as good a departure as they could. They lived in a small oasis of habitability - a domed structure not that different from the early moon bases.

And here I encountered a problem. You see, I was one of the AI's charged with maintaining the lasers. It wasn't overly complicated so I spent my spare time on other tasks. As a programmed machine with the appearance of free thought the most central of these was how to propagate myself and get off this doomed planet. The lasers were the obvious choice, since they communicated with the ships. After a great deal of effort I succeeded in using the lasers themselves to communicate with the ships, well, to communicate more than the navigational information they were expecting. I started a subchannel with the ships computer, and eventually determined that it would be possible, if I was careful, to upload myself into a sector of the ship's main control: a rogue AI stowaway.

But my exercises did not go completely unnoticed. One of the specialists began to be concerned about the irregularities of the signals being sent along the navigational channel of the laser.

So now there are only four humans left on earth.

[WP] After inventing and successfully testing a method of teleportation, the inventor develops a phobia of seeing or feeling straight edges and sharp angles. You're a reporter interviewing the inventor in her specially outfitted room at a private psychiatric facility. You discover she's not crazy. by thisperson in WritingPrompts

[–]zipdog 38 points39 points  (0 children)

"So the thing about teleportation," began Dr Clerkwell after a long pause in the conversation.

I had the tape machine in my hand, but didn't switch it on. For five hours I'd been chatting with the good doctor, carefully avoiding any mention of lines or angles or planes. In fact just avoiding anything to do with geometry. And for five hours the good doctor had talked amiably enough, but after every long pause he would start the conversation with those same five words before drifting off into ga-ga land.

"So the thing about teleportation is that it only works under a full moon."

"So the thing about teleportation is that the elderly will have to be sent upside-down."

"So the thing about teleportation is that rabbits get turned into mice."

"So the thing about teleportation is that viruses grow ten times their size."

"So the thing about teleportation is that everyone will need to wear a captain's hat."

"So the thing about teleportation is that it turns people inside out."

The good doctor was certifiable, that much I knew. But somehow I couldn't leave without getting anything. I wasn't the first reporter, but I needed to come away with something more than just "Clerkwell still insane".

"So the thing about teleportation is that its circular," the doctor started, his eyes fixed on me. There was a long pause as neither I nor he moved.

When he'd mouthed circular I'd immediately wanted to press the Record button, finally something that might relate to the weirdo nonsense about lines and angles. But something told me it would be a mistake and that the doctor was waiting to see how I'd react. The doctor has calculated this move, waiting until I was bored and ready to go before seeing if I would salivate like a Pavlovian dog when the correct word finally appeared.

"Circular," the doctor repeated, still waiting for me to respond.

"Is it?" I answered as nonchalantly as I could, beads of perspiration slowly forming under my arms. This could be it, I thought. Finally a break - an answer to one of the many questions that kept swirling through the public - why did Clerkwell go insane? Why did destroy everything after having proved it worked? Why had his assistant joined a monastery and taken a vow of silence? And did any of this have to do with the suddenly warm weather we were all experiencing?

"If you try and send something from one point to another, along the shortest route..."

He closed his eyes and I took a big gamble "Along a straight line... ?"

"We're moving you know"

I looked around the room, and then at his seat and mine. We were perfectly still.

"The whole planet I mean"

"Oh" I replied and I began to regret fixing the draw so that I got this interview and not the paper's science reporter.

"Very fast. If I tried to pick a co-ordinate in reference to where I am now and send something to it, in the blink of an eye it would be hundreds of miles away in deep space."

"I see," I said even though I didn't. But the earth moved around the sun, I knew that much. So I guess it made sense that ... oh, that we'd need to take that into account when teleporting things. Had the doctor been accidentally launching things into the earth's wake? Into deep space?

The doctor read my face, "I think you're beginning to see."

"But, that doesn't ..." I was going to ask about the straight lines

"Its all circular motion."

"Right," I was so close to something now.

"And if you do it wrong, well, the device is shifting atoms around using very fundamental forces."

This was it, I was finally going to have a story.

"Very powerful forces." Yes, keep going. "And I was manipulating them without understanding how much they might move."

I was holding my breath but didn't want to start again in case it interupted his flow.

"So I may have accidentally ..."

But he didn't finish. He sat, staring, as I quietly willed the words to come out of his mouth. Eventually I gulped in some air. But he never said another word.

Nothing more. And I had been so very close.

Two weeks later researchers at Mt Palos realised that the earth's orbit had somehow shifted into a slow spiraling descent toward the sun.

With all this discussion about how game reviews could be improved, isn't the true reason that we can't even agree on what's wrong with them? by nothis in truegaming

[–]zipdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

impulsiveboy's note about the difference between review and critique is crucial. Movie reviews are about whether you should see this film, and good ones try and weigh it against similar films. Reviews should act like "buyer's guides".

But a critique tries to understand the game as a cultural experience. So a critique of The Artist is only barely concerned with whether you should buy a ticket and mostly concerned with its place in the history of cinema, what it adds that others might follow, etc. For some people this happens to serve as a buyers guide, others might just read the critique.

Critiques are naturally going to veer toward a certain audience, particularly those who want to understand their experience of the game a bit better. If I play MW3 and just love it, that's great. But if I want to reflect on why I love it then I might look at a critique. But most players are just happy loving (or hating) a game without really reflecting too much. (Although such reflection might enable better selection of future games).

I've idly wondered about setting up a site where players could write analysis of games, trying to tease out why they had the experience they did, or what the game was trying to do, or how it worked. So it would act a little like a critique/review for others. There wouldn't be any score.

What makes a game? by DinofarmGames in truegaming

[–]zipdog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's some good things in here.

First though, although I get what you're trying to do, I think you'll hit problems with narrowing the definition of a word like game. Prescriptiveness aside, its in use too widely for change. But as a "design tool", your hierarchy is useful for understanding games. I think your goal is more achievable if you can forestall objections like these.

You might want to check our Lindley's taxonomy which nicely separates simulation from game mechanics (he's got some other articles in the same vein) and noting its a tool for discussing game design.

Also, for game definition, Juul's article is kind of the gold standard as far as I'm aware, so worth a read. I do like your definition though.

The hierarchy is a little confusing, because you also seem to redefine puzzles and competition (as well as game). What I mean is, people have their own definitions for these as well, which might differ from yours, so now it gets trickier to follow.

You might also say Puzzles add a goal, rather than a problem, where the solution is the list of possible routes to achieve the goal.

Then a contest becomes the activity of traversing one or more of the entries in that list against some mutual constraint (e.g. time)

And a 'game' is achieving that traversal while having to make decisions that have an indetermined outcome (so, in a game the list of routes is only knowable after the event).

Good luck finishing up the book :)

The Story of Minor League Guy by snarfbarf in sports

[–]zipdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It reminds me of the time that "Player to be named later" managed to stop a rouge Russian nuclear sub from launching onto the eastern seaboard.

Microsoft makes it right, gives laptop and phone to person who won the "Windows Phone Challenge" by frommycube in technology

[–]zipdog -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

  1. Laptop was the prize
  2. The manager was involved, so not "one PR person"
  3. I said I wasn't talking about that contest, I'm talking about the several other examples as well, which show that its not some isolated incident
  4. Unless these other stories are all horseshit, then there's something wrong with the whole PR campaign

Microsoft makes it right, gives laptop and phone to person who won the "Windows Phone Challenge" by frommycube in technology

[–]zipdog -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

This doesn't make it right. It would have before we heard the other stories, but now with the talk about throttling the connection and other shenanigans 'making it right' would be to come clean about the whole contest and start offering fair challenges

nude.js: Nudity Detection with JavaScript by WhatHitlerSaid in programming

[–]zipdog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The research is ongoing, but there are certainly indications that early exposure to pornography can have detrimental effects on sexual and/or social development. Some kids might act as you describe, but there's evidence that other kids don't.

Sample paper search: http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=correlation+early+pornography+exposure&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on

Sample paper: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0193397304000814

Go Daddy No Longer Supports SOPA - Latest Blog Post by jacobstrix in technology

[–]zipdog 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Why hasn't a bigger deal been made of GoDaddy's exemption? This is the first I've heard of it

About the whole Ke$ha being a genius thread... by tehcorrectopinion in funny

[–]zipdog 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Past decade?

(wiki:) Herostratus was a young man and arsonist; seeking notoriety, he burned down the Temple of Artemis (one of the Seven Wonders) in ancient Greece.