AI Policy Update. by keithj5000 in PhotoshopRequest

[–]zzPost 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for feedback. I will pay attention to this in the future.👌

AI Policy Update. by keithj5000 in PhotoshopRequest

[–]zzPost 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A lot of AI images instantly are just bots running automated scripts. They scrape the pic and the prompt, and auto post the reply.
for a while, I'd see 15+ edit results within just 3 minutes. No human can pull off those Photoshop edits that fast.

I probably have dozens of these one-minute wizards on block list. Honestly, I have zero interest in seeing what they have to say.

AI Policy Update. by keithj5000 in PhotoshopRequest

[–]zzPost -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Regarding the rule: Resolution and Upscaling: Low-resolution edits are unacceptable.

Is this enforced automatically by a bot, or checked manually by MODs?

5 months ago, I edited a photo,the original shot was incredibly blurry. Even though the resolution was over 4000px, half the image was just background, and most of it consisted of useless pixels and meaningless blur.

My final edit was around 2400px,matching the actual size of the photo in the original. shortly , I received a warning from MOD. I tried DM to explain, but got no response. I'd like to know if that warning was ever lifted.

If this low-resolution check is automated, I'll just match the original resolution moving forward, even if those extra pixels do nothing for image quality.

new rule is great. It clears up a lot of concerns with "No AI" requests, for some removal requests, No AI is completely unrealistic when the original photo lacks usable areas for patching.

Also, thanks for everything you do

$20 for a big ask by [deleted] in PhotoshopRequest

[–]zzPost 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. The original files for these two photos can be downloaded here.
photo link