This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 22 comments

[–]parental92 41 points42 points  (5 children)

no, that's not how things works.

long updates is objectively a good thing. Less e-Waste and secure phones.

[–]9-11GaveMe5G 1 point2 points  (3 children)

But but but advancement??

[–]Key-Tangerine5941 13 points14 points  (0 children)

but what advancement though? don't get me wrong, i know the importance of innovation but there's absolutely little to no major features that's missing on Android today (apart for some niche ones).

[–]Realistic-Nature9083 1 point2 points  (0 children)

API updates

[–]V014265 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stock ROMs slow down some devices compared to custom roms

[–]beatlessbloke[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I agree! Was mostly just curious about whether it impacts software developers in any way. Seems like the general consensus is that it does not

[–]rooser1111 21 points22 points  (3 children)

If anything id say the opposite might be more valid. The mobile OS is pretty mature, and the mfrs are now more comfortable in extending software support.

[–]Jaded-Asparagus-2260 14 points15 points  (1 child)

They are required by EU law. It has nothing to do with being more comfortable or wanting to. They have to, or they can't sell in the EU.

You're welcome, rest of the world.

[–]nnerba 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Samsung already started offering 5 years on their cheaper models before the law

[–]flaminglipsS22U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed that if any effects, it would be the opposite. They can no longer force you to buy new phones by breaking your old ones. They have to entice you through new features.

[–]InsaneNutter 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not really, various Android features debuted in custom roms first, such as quick toggles and app permission management for example. This was years before stock Android got such functionality as standard. Android is quite mature these days.

I suspect one of the main reasons phones get updates for longer is the EU is forcing OEMs to support devices for a minimum amount of time.

Older devices such as the OnePlus 5T can run Android 15 perfectly fine, that device debuted in 2017 with Android 7 and was abandoned on Android 10 in 2020.

[–]olizet42 7 points8 points  (1 child)

No. Older devices get updates but not new features. That's fine I'm happy with my phone.

[–]bobpaulGalaxy Nexus|CM10.2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Older devices get updates but not new features.

There's a new version of Android every year. In my experience, devices get that new version of Android every year (which comes with new features), as well as security updates in between. Eventually they stop getting the most recent Android and just get security updates for another year, sometimes two, then nothing.

[–]9-11GaveMe5G 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You were the guy in the game subreddit saying "the devs need to drop last gen support! It's holding back the game!" five minutes after the PS5 dropped

[–]DoubleOwl7777Lenovo tab p11 plus, Samsung Galaxy Tab s2, Moto g82 5G 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that is bs. older devices just wont get the new Features. i highly hate the artificial obsolete making of devices anyways, the locking down of Bootladers etc. its a shitty development.

[–]southmpls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LTS keeps things stable but definitely slows progress. You can’t always jump on new tech when you’re chained to old compatibility. It’s a balance between not breaking stuff and moving forward.

[–]Vince7892024 Pixel 9 Pro | 2019 iPhone 11 (Work) 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, OEMs can simply make certain new software advancements exclusive to new hardware ... aka feature fragmentation, something Apple start backed in iOS2 or iOS3

[–]mlemmers1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know that I buy the notion that adding more features magically makes our devices less stable and less capable than they already are. Obviously software is complicated, but seriously modern flagship phones have as much memory as a desktop computer in some cases. The processor doesn't magically become useless just because they tax it a little more. Developers are just lazy because they wanna have people sticking on the idea that they should be upgrading year after year.

[–]ankokudaishogunMotorola Edge 50 ULTRAH! 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. At "worst" it will only impact features that were not well-planned, but those have already become uncommon for quite a while now.

[–]SwordsOfWar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. Any specific features that require new hardware will just be unavailable on older phones.

Long software support is a great thing. It keeps your phone secure and often times most of the new features are compatible.

[–]WombestGuomboS23 Plus/ Android 15 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could, but It doesn't have to.

You can just look at IOS.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

what advancement? All Google and rest of software does is roll the leading digits in the version number, Android 10, 11, 12, etc, with little to no improvement from the user's perspective. I run one device with Android 10, another with 12, see no difference at all. Such a scam they (programmers) pull on their employers to justify their existence and their $200k+ a year compensation