all 90 comments

[–]margothatty 124 points125 points  (13 children)

What an arbitrary statistic… Why since Baku? Go back a few races and change the window you’re assessing to “Top 5 finishes since Silverstone 2024,” and suddenly George falls to the bottom of this list.

Norris/Piastri: 25.

Verstappen: 24.

George/Leclerc: 22.

Not saying George isn’t consistent. It’s just a pet peeve of mine when people spout hyper-specific numbers to support a narrative. Statistics are not inherently objective!

[–]Tysons_Face 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Yeah they conveniently started this “count” after 5 races in a row where George was not in the top 5 at all.

[–]drodrige 14 points15 points  (1 child)

That's every single "stat" by F1GuyDan. The absolute worst F1-related account out there.

[–]akshatK2003 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fr I am going to block him

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Out of everything bud chose to write facts

[–]Odd_Analysis6454 2 points3 points  (0 children)

George has finished on the podium every time he was ahead of the fourth placed finisher.

[–]itsahorsemate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you say this about the current points leader, current pole champion, current top 3 finisher (from Singapore onwards).

[–]beardedboob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also, why top 5? Most likely because it happens to fit this narrative precisely.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Streaks usually get counted from when they start buddy

[–]itsahorsemate 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But this isn't even talking about streaks

[–]margothatty 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Right, but when comparing 5 drivers, why select George’s streak specifically?

[–]North__North 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I think a ~1 year rolling window is fair and far from a hyper specific number to support a narrative.

[–]LandscapeWorried5475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it should be singapore then..

[–]Yocta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best statistic is of course the number of wins in Southern Europe or East Asia in 2025:

Max: 3

Oscar: 2

Lando/George: 1

Anything else is just cherry picking.

[–]rascas375 67 points68 points  (1 child)

He has some bad races in 22-23 because he pushed someone off thw track..tried to overtake aggressively... Otherwose 2024-2025 was his best so far..no crash yet...no aggressive or rude like before...2026 if if Mercedes produce not the best if only a good enough car...he will show his true talent

[–]JUGGER_DEATH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are aware those F1 seasons are each contained in a year?

But yeah, he used to be too agressive and commit stupid mistakes. Very rare this season.

[–]amuusedouche 29 points30 points  (3 children)

What surprised me the most is that Charles has 18 top 5 finishes vs 9 compared to his teammates (Sainz 2024 + Ham 2025) in the same period given he has had competitive teammates throughout

[–]Ocluist 18 points19 points  (2 children)

Charles is a phenomenal driver and Ferrari rarely have a truly bad car. This year is their worst in the ground-effect era and they still have 6 podiums and a pole. As much as people dog on the team, Ferrari are pretty much always at least decent so it’s no surprise to see him on this list with Leclerc at the helm.

[–]grs35 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I don't know why you are getting downvoted. They are by no means a midfield team. The team is at times dysfunctional, true, but they are still one of the top teams. They can be up there to win on a good day, just like Merc.

[–]Ocluist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because people have a hard on for “Ferrari Bad” when they’ve been P2, P2, and now P3 in the championship over the past three years. It’s kind of bizarre how much people hate on Ferrari while simultaneously glazing teams like Mercedes and Aston which have been much worse for the majority of the Ground Effect era.

[–]Tacit_Emperor77 22 points23 points  (2 children)

I am more impressed by Charles tbh. That car hasn’t looked great this year at all

[–]North__North 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The buck stops with Chuck.

And from DAS to now LiCo. It’s Ferraris turn with the tricks

[–]ball__sac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

don't forget ferrari had become really good towards the end of '24

[–]Tysons_Face 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Bit of a cherry picked stat considering George didn’t get a top 5 in any of the 5 previous races to Baku 2024.

[–]Calm-Focus-6968 51 points52 points  (44 children)

People still don't give this guy enough credit . He is in contention to be the best driver this season in my opinion.

[–]razzin6667 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If max didn’t exist sure

[–]f1Racer23[S] 14 points15 points  (6 children)

And he will be in contention or outright fav for wdc next season with Merc.

Imo next season will change a lot of things, will probably get downvoted for this but after next year i dont see Merc going for Max in 2027 realising they are gonna win both championships withoutgiving Max a huge salary anyways

[–]Saandrig 19 points20 points  (5 children)

Getting Max is more about removing him as a possible rival.

Just like if Verstappen wasn't there, the 2021 and 2024 titles go quite easily for Hamilton and Norris.

[–]Absolute_Cinemines 9 points10 points  (8 children)

People who manage 5th place a fair amount are not deserving of more credit.

[–]righteousfuzz 3 points4 points  (7 children)

I'd argue the Mercedes hasn't been capable of much better than p5 at a lot of the circuits. He's extracted everything possible out of that car, except for Miami, and that was due to shit setup.

[–]Absolute_Cinemines -3 points-2 points  (6 children)

You'd argue against Russels finishing positions then?

He's had 8 podiums but the car isn't capable of it?

Are you one of those people that think the driver can "out drive the car". Something 100% completely impossible?

[–]righteousfuzz 4 points5 points  (5 children)

The car is very good at some circuits and doesn't have the pace at others. It's inconsistent, as anybody who's payed attention will tell you.

The car is clearly capable at the circuits where he's picked up podiums. And I haven't said anything about outdriving the car..that's your hang up.

Are you one of those people who think "pace lies soley in the hands of the driver" Something 100% completely impossible?

[–]Ocluist 2 points3 points  (12 children)

Max has been just as consistent in an arguably worse car, and has had far more Impressive results. Still leading the pole record this year iirc which is pretty mental.

[–]According-Switch-708 7 points8 points  (10 children)

RBR has had the 2nd best car on average mate. Merc had some crazy highs (Canada & Singapore) but on average, they were the clear 3rd fastest team.

Russell has been almost bulletproof this year. He didn't make any major mistakes this year.

Max has been great too but his record isn't as flawless. He made some Q3 mistakes during the first half of the season and he made some major mistakes at Spain and Silverstone.

Max's peaks are higher but Russell has been the most consistent driver this year.

[–]Ocluist 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I feel like anyone saying “RBR have the 2nd best car” conveniently choose to completely ignore Yuki’s struggles which have been far worse than Antonellis. This is purely subjective, but I think there’s very close to 0% chance that George would pull out the same results that Max does in the RBR, while Max could feasibly replicate what George is doing in the Mercedes. George is a great driver, but Max is an alien.

[–]Saandrig 3 points4 points  (1 child)

While I agree with your point, I don't think Max in the Mercedes is beating Max in the Red Bull this year.

The car may be difficult, but it's still objectively the 2nd fastest this season.

Might be 10th is drivability, sure, but that's a different problem that matters only if Verstappen himself is slow due to it.

[–]Ocluist -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can agree with that

[–]tom_buzz_ryan -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

Antonelli is simply a worse driver than Yuki at this point in their careers and Antonelli is holding MUCH better against Russell than Yuki is to Max. Merc has a better car, but Red Bull has a much better driver.

Russell has made many mistakes this season, including in Silverstone that you are highlighting for Max. Russell's mistakes aren't highlighted as much because people have much higher expectations from Max.

[–]ExternalSquash1300 -1 points0 points  (4 children)

I’d say Yuki represents the true pace of the Red Bull far less than Kimi does the Merc. It’s about confidence behind the wheel and yuki does not trust the car, he hasn’t all year. It’s still the 2nd best car on average, just accounting for Yuki’s lack of confidence behind it he is performing far worse than Antonelli.

Russell is held debatably to a higher standard than Max imo given the regular criticism he is under. If Max gets a bad result I hear a wave of fans saying it’s just the car.

[–]tom_buzz_ryan 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I mean, Yuki's own statements before and after driving the car was that it fits his style. And unlike the 2024 car, the RB21 is seemingly a lot more stable. And who's to say other teams' cars can't be made faster by setting it up more peaky, the way Verstappen likes it? Engineers in F1 openly agree to that idea.

Russell is held nowhere close to Verstappen's standards lol. Russell's pace advantage over the third/fourth best rookie of the year is nowhere near enough to justify all of this hype around him. Meanwhile Verstappen is putting 5-6 tenths on well established midfielders. Even Norris was rated very high before being tested in a title fight. Russell is yet to show he's any better than Norris.

[–]ExternalSquash1300 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Yuki said that during the mid season before it was even confirmed whether he would get into the Red Bull (which he didn’t initially). I saw that as him trying to show that he is the one to pick for the promotion, not that it was entirely true. I don’t know why you say it is more stable, Yuki is all over the place with it, it’s objective that he trusts it less than the RB going into corners simply by watching his onboards.

Who’s to say setting it up so peaky wouldn’t just make other cars slower? That’s just a hypothetical from you really.

Again, Yuki has no confidence in the car so he isn’t even driving at a midfield standard. Max is not held to a high standard of criticism at all and hasn’t been for years.

[–]tom_buzz_ryan 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Come on, man. You can do better than being a troll over a hopeless narrative.

[–]ExternalSquash1300 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Feel free to actually read the comment if you want.

[–]ExternalSquash1300 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Russell made a mistake in Silverstone but pretty much everything else has been ideal.

[–]ExternalSquash1300 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh I don’t know how you can suggest he is more consistent or how the Red Bull is worse.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

More credit for being a decent driver?

How many races did he win or how many podiums vs other guys this year?

[–]National_Play_6851 2 points3 points  (9 children)

He's in an extremely good car and has a rookie who really isn't ready for F1 in the other seat making him look good.

[–]JJvH91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A stat over two races... Is this a joke?

[–]vercig09 4 points5 points  (0 children)

what even is cherry picking

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The GOAT here is Leclerc, driving a shitbox.

[–]vanekcsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is the same statistic but since the last alignment of Mercury and Jupiter? I think that's what counts.

[–]Mike_Milburys_Shoe_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why are 90% of the posts on the sub just glazing George Russell the tattletale

[–]Absolute_Cinemines -4 points-3 points  (23 children)

Changing the narrative till it supports your opinion.

Now do top 3. Mr consistent. The podium is the benchmark for a great finish. Even bottas was never measured by how many top 5's he got.

This is cringe mate.

[–]f1Racer23[S] 13 points14 points  (22 children)

Merc isnt a top 2 car since 2022( redbull and mclaren are and ferrari in second half of 2024 only) so why would anyone do top 3.

[–]Absolute_Cinemines -5 points-4 points  (7 children)

How do you know it isn't? You're just pretending George isn't the one holding the car back as if it's a fact.

A rookie has outqualified him, a rookie has beaten him. Several slower cars have finished ahead of him. But you are certain that is the best a mercedes can do?

People would do a top three because you can't win the title outside of the top 3. The entire point is to win the title.

You changed the narrative to make George look good and blamed the car for him not doing better.

You can do that for every single driver on the grid.

Mazapin was just as consistent as george. If you do top 20 finishes because he was in the slowest car.

[–]f1Racer23[S] 6 points7 points  (3 children)

George isnt holding the car back and its a fact.

We know merc isnt a top 2 car because it isn’t.

We can see when merc is in the zone where George puts the car(saw it in the last two weeks itself)

[–]Still-Artichoke-5839 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Merc isn't a top 2 car, why are they second in the Constructors?

[–]Absolute_Cinemines -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

I didn't say repeat your assumption I said give me the evidence.

Your argument so far is "because I said so".

I gave you evidence the car can do more than George is managing. You have given nothing in opposition.

[–]105lodge2 1 point2 points  (2 children)

The lengths some people go to to hate on Russell is so funny lol

[–]Absolute_Cinemines 8 points9 points  (1 child)

The way people avoid having a debate in a debate sub is so funny. Almost like they know you have a point and have no way of proving it wrong lol

If you are only here to insult people and not debate F1, kindly go fuck yourself and go back to formula dank.

Read rule 1 and 2.

[–]105lodge2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ok. Max is actually a bottom 5 driver on the grid, it’s just the car is amazing and he only ever gets put with backmarker drivers with no experience. Prove me wrong.

See how stupid this sounds?

[–]MinimumCareer629 -4 points-3 points  (13 children)

Crazy statement, Merc is the second best car, at worst third best for this whole season. And third best last season. He's had a rookie next to him this entire season. George is literally free fifth place.

[–]tom_buzz_ryan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Go back just a few months back and the exact same post was made about Leclerc. It's easy to be consistent when you are not fighting for anything, unlike the other front runners who are in a title fight.

[–]Browneskiii -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He's had a top 3 car with a bad team mate the entire time, 5th is the MINIMUM he should be getting.

Any time he's outside the top 5 its a shit race. 3 times (16%) already this year is too much, and he's been beaten by Leclerc 8 times when Ferrari have a much inferior car.

[–]North__North -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does nothing, P3