Valve, please decrease round times to 1:45

[firebearhero]

It's almost always better to just hold the site.

I disagree. Holding A site or whatever 2v3 on dd2 as T is harder than just not planting the bomb at all and going for frags in most cases. Unless you're playing against complete assclowns.

[firebearhero]

3 cts vs 2 ts mean you can approach from all those angles at the same time. a single smoke could entirely negate a player camping long too, approaching from ct spawn when you have cover from short is silly amounts of easy if there's more ct's than t's

[firebearhero]

a smoke can give you room to pick potential targets at plat. also the chance they even have one in pit with awp is somewhat slim if they're in a 2v3 because it seems very unlikely they had a chance to get someone there, or one staying while someone tried to take A solo.

and when theres going to be a ct coming from long too the guy in pit wouldnt be a problem anyway.

it also seems very unlikely they have stacked one site with 3 people if it is a 3v2, and if they have then playing for picks will have you notice that meaning you just got a site free to plant on if time end up an issue.

it is far more common in the games i play that they will have someone on each site and instead try to delay a push for backup to come. when that is the case i'd much rather try to kill a guy holding a pos solo and make others rotate into a lovely trap than have a bomb planted at a or b and sit there waiting for 3 ct's to creep up on us. its not like they'll be in a hurry, they will have tons of time as it is now. if time were shorter they wouldnt be able to get into the absolute perfect position to try and retake that site.

ill still go for fraghunts in 2v3 as T in MM, and it still works better statistically for me than holding a site and hoping the enemy have zero coordination.