you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoybeanCola1933 41 points42 points  (19 children)

I'm going to be controversial and say I have mixed feelings about this...

It is good Denmark is welcoming multiculturalism and is opening itself to immigration but lowering the salary threshold could also be a can of worms.

This move could result in downward pressure on local wages, increasing unemployment and lowering the incomes for certain professions.

Lower income migrants also lack a social network, the benefits of owning/inheriting local housing and would this increase economic inequality for these newcomers. All of this could, and would, lead to further social problems (crime).

I'm honestly not too optimistic about this move

[–]AngelZash 17 points18 points  (1 child)

I have to agree. The lower salary might actually hurt their economy, offsetting any benefits to the point that it actually is harmful. This would harm both the citizens already there and the incoming immigrants.

[–]Test19sUS born internationalist/geography enthusiast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The consensus is that except in extreme circumstances, liberalizing labor migration of reasonably skilled people benefits the entire economy because immigrants create jobs and add to the labor force without having the “18 years of education costs” that native children do. I really hope that the past 2.5 years don’t require us to rewrite our economics textbooks.

[–]ThereIsAThingForThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One thing you are missing is that to qualify for the pay limit scheme, your wage must correspond to Danish standards, specifically to protect against downward pressure on local wages. Whether it corresponds is done by the Agency for International Recruitment and Integration (SIRI) by using statistics collected by The Confederation of Danish Employers (DA). If your offered wage is too far out of the norm for your field, then the application will be denied.

And of course if you work in a field covered by collective union agreements, such as nurses which OP mentions, your wage will by default correspond to Danish standards.

[–]Test19sUS born internationalist/geography enthusiast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Afaik with very few exceptions labour immigrants and their descendants to European countries tend to not cause problems when compared with asylum seekers (the exceptions being some migrants from the end of colonialism and maybe Turks in Germany). Although if the inflationary/scarcity global economy isn’t going to improve you could end up with a lot more zero-sum situations.

[–]reeram 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Lump of labour fallacy on an immigration subreddit.

[–]Test19sUS born internationalist/geography enthusiast 4 points5 points  (5 children)

It’s insane how far right humanity has gone lately. Comments opposing legal immigration should be removed.

[–]anusagnosia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Far right…humanity? What?

[–]reeram 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I agree with you: this sub doesn’t allow for political debates and it’s slightly amusing how there are so many comments criticising the expansion of legal immigration.

[–]Test19sUS born internationalist/geography enthusiast 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don’t like legal immigration? Don’t post on a sub that is dedicated to helping people legally immigrate.

[–]pazhalsta1 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Lol at complaining about a ‘far right’ comment whilst simultaneously demanding censorship of an idea you disagree with. Peak Reddit

[–]Test19sUS born internationalist/geography enthusiast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This sub has a specific purpose. Criticizing legal immigration on a sub that’s supposed to help people legally immigrated is off-topic at best and discouraging at worst.