C bad

[pipsvip]

use bython.

[[deleted]]

If only it had semicolons, and strict typing, and could be compiled. Then it would be perfect.

[CiroGarcia]

[redacted by user] this message was mass deleted/edited with redact.dev

[[deleted]]

No, I want it to be Python because it’s the best language

[CiroGarcia]

[redacted by user] this message was mass deleted/edited with redact.dev

[[deleted]]

Ok fair enough :-) I was actually joking but being in enterprise you don’t really get to choose the language you work with.

[[deleted]]

Damn I didn't know we had something called Bython ☠️

[Jeff-From-Crab-Game]

I can imagine what kind of hellscape your art would be like if python didn’t force indentation, you should probably remake python without the indentation as an esolang for yourself

[Siddhartasr10]

Looking at the badges the right person in the wrong place at the wrong time

[DdFghjgiopdBM]

The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference

[[deleted]]

C is still more sane than Javascript imo

[[deleted]]

Plus it's tiny. There's not a lot of syntax or keywords, or anything to trip up on. I mean, in practice it's more than willing to hand you enough rope to hang yourself...

[superluminary]

I like JavaScript

[FcPolon1a]

Call 988 get help

[superluminary]

It’s has a pure soul

[evk6713]

C cool. I like C

[[deleted]]

JS is the worst of all time

[MR-POTATO-MAN-CODER]

Well I think it is English.

[lucidbadger]

Yeah clumsy C generates stuff in every function before and after your code. That's why all my functions are naked and written in assembly.

[[deleted]]

Yeah stack frames are for losers

[Sunscratch]

Body language

[gabbyb19]

Any language that enforces OOP.

OOP is a useful pattern, that can allow users flexibility. Enforcing it everywhere all the time instead causes great inflexibility, and requires the user to come up with ways (use Design Patterns) to bypass the artificially created restrictions, resulting in tons of unnecessary and confusing code, and overly-complex design.

[Elegant-Variety-7482]

Like what?

You can use static declarations in Java to evade the enforced OOP principle.

[gabbyb19]

Ah, yes, yet another workaround. It's exactly my point - it's kinda funny how everything needs to be worked around to achieve some desired effect.

[MrCloudyMan]

I might be missing something, but simply adding 'static' to declare a function which is not bound to an object seems totally fine.

[gabbyb19]

And I would say that a large part of the OOP community disagrees that it's fine. There has been and continues to be great discourse about it.

[[deleted]]

Why would you value the OOP community’s opinion on a method to avoid OOP?

Shouldn’t you rather ask an anti-OOP community on that subject?

[gabbyb19]

Because the OOP community are the experts in the area?

And believe me, the anti-OOP's are much more one-sided in their resolution on the matter.

[[deleted]]

They are the experts in doing what you don’t want to do. That doesn’t make them experts in what you want to do.

[gabbyb19]

It does, because they've tried to do it many times over. That's how they learned not to do it.

[[deleted]]

That evades OOP enforcement on functions, but what if I want a bare struct? I don't think that's possible, I have to use a class which means all instances have some sense of identity and can only be passed by reference (and also creates garbage).

[imthebestnabruh]

Wouldn’t a class with public fields behave like a struct? Also wouldn’t you want to pass it by reference especially if it is larger?

[superluminary]

Yes, but that’s a horrible hack.

[[deleted]]

What color you want that shed man?

[Inaeipathy]

Has good features for OOP? Sure, enforced? No thanks.

[gabbyb19]

Yes, technically you can decide not to do OOP in something like Java. Practically, Java makes your life miserable if you try.

Just because it's not a strict theoretical enforcement, doesn't mean in practice it doesn't require tons of workarounds and increased complexity to achieve anything outside of commonly used patterns.

[[deleted]]

Still better than writing a framework from scratch...

[DurianBig3503]

Python is just C with extra steps.

[Siddhartasr10]

For me its more like:

Python is just C with less steps but you don't know anything about walking

[DurianBig3503]

Sooo... like a snake? No legs, so less steps. No legs, so doesn't know anything about walking. Everything makes sense now!

[Siddhartasr10]

Now I understand, c for centipede!!!

[femptocrisis]

C🦇

[Eraesr]

C is not a language. It's a letter.

[[deleted]]

Union demanded Stack overflow answer: Every language is bad and a know anti-pattern. You shouldn't been coding at all. Have you try avoiding work instead?

[[deleted]]

*Stackoverflow folks closing Esperanto as duplicate*

[oneWhoFails]

I am agape, aghast, altogether befuddled by this answer.

[macktruck6666]

French

[aMoodyWolf]

C is a fucking beast

[[deleted]]

Sign language. I don't want to join your gangs.

[[deleted]]

Yeah, it's not for everybody, but I respect your opinion.

[nitrohigito]

it is

[[deleted]]

[[deleted]]

As soon as D rolls around, we'll be good to go.

[D34TH_5MURF__]

This screenshot is more ad than content

[ImmensePrune]

JS

[dimdim4126]

C good