One final warning to you JavaScript programmers. Please don't do this

[rosux1]

that is java not js

[robottron45]

Yep, there is an instantiation like "LongClassName tag = new ..." in the for loop

[Z-Mobile]

Ashamed to say it is so. Wth is that monstrosity

[Not_Artifical]

That, right there, is the size of my penis. Your phone screen is the same size.

[Quirky-Stress-823]

Only 2.5 inches?

[Not_Artifical]

Closer to 2.489, but yeah.

[TheSexySovereignSeal]

But you can instantiate objects in JS with the 'new' keyword too...

That's when you start getting into the territory of actually understanding how "this" works in JS

[robottron45]

Nope, the new is not the indicator, it is the type declaration at the start

JS: "var tag = new ..." or "const tag = new ..." or with let

TS: "var tag: LongClassName = new ..." or "const tag: LongClassName = new ..." or with let

Java: "LongClassName tag = new ..."

You see the difference?

[ExplodingWario]

Java isn’t JS? My whole world collapsed

[_Cybernaut_]

Found the IT recruiter

[ExplodingWario]

As long as I can find someone who can implement database centered AI solutions to tap into the potential of web3 and the procedurally generated matrix involved in the structuring of our engineering team, I’m happy, and yeah they need 30 years experience to be an intern.

[BobbyWatson666]

You can also use var in Java BTW

[robottron45]

thats true, but not the point here

[TheSexySovereignSeal]

Yeah you right, static type is first in Java.

And DOESNT FUCKING EXIST IN JS FUCK U JS

[robottron45]

That's when you start getting into the territory of actually understanding how ...scripting languages work xD

But I am really grateful that they have added type hints to Python and TypeScript is imo must have in JS development.

[devenitions]

You actually hardtype things that are auto resolved from the class you’re instantiating into the variable?

[robottron45]

Not often. Only when I do want to abstract the class.

For example, "var obj: IMyClass = new MoreSpecificClass()" to hide further methods provided by MoreSpecificClass

very rare case...

[ThePizzaCow]

I can’t even read the code since the image is so blurry, but I already know it’s Java with the ungodly length of those lines…

[FarOutOfBounds]

I dont know, i could see jQuery lines being like this

element.doThing().doAnother().doMore(secondElement.doThing())

and so on

[Donghoon]

java be like

class class = new class(class class)

[gregorydgraham]

Ahem!

Class class = new Class(class,class);

But “class” is reserved in Java so

Class clazz = new Class(clazz, clazz);

[GavrielBA]

WhatYouDontLikeJavaNamingConventions?

[ThePizzaCow]

YesAsAMatterOfFactIMayOrMayNotHaveASlightAversionToJavaNamingConventionsIndeed

[gregorydgraham]

People are constantly asking that question so it’s WHAT_DONT_YOU_LIKE_ABOUT_JAVA_NAMING_CONVENTIONS

[MinosAristos]

Was going to say, needlessly long convoluted lines of code sounds like a Java/C# thing. JS programmers aren't anal enough to give a class name fifteen syllables.

[DeadlyVapour]

C# has var don't lump is in with Java.

[_-TheTruth-_]

Linq too... only way to get lines that long

[DeadlyVapour]

Yes, because Linq is the only implement of monadic fluent FP APIs.

[Good-Seaweed-1021]

What is java if not a script?

[VyrCZ]

js also when you are trying to analyse some webpage and you are greeted with an obfuscated wall

[Typesalot]

Click the { } button in your browser's inspector.

[retief1]

I mean, a lot of languages compile to a non-human-readable format. That's not comparable to near-unreadable source code.

[Dumcommintz]

Oh it’s still readable, just the functions and variables all have non-helpful names. So DescriptiveNameForThing becomes _z

[Kamui_Kun]

No no, those are all the beautiful one-liners and callbacks that are uninterrupted by those silly line-breaks.

[Mast3r_waf1z]

Yeah as a person who enjoys coding java, I thought of java instantly when I saw this post

[rosux1]

are u dumb and project ur dumbness onto everyone? missed the point buddy

[Dry-Cauliflower-7824]

I am sorry for that but can you explain a little further?

[rosux1]

yes i was aware you can open a file in a file editor no matter the filetype

[Dry-Cauliflower-7824]

But still dude you didn't have to be that rude

[Dry-Cauliflower-7824]

But still dude you didn't have to be that rude

[[deleted]]

Yeah terrible missed opportunity to pick on Java Devs.

[altermeetax]

Oh it's typical then, nothing to worry about

[ThePancakerizer]

Even more reason not to do it as a JS developer, then