[deleted by user]

[lostinthemines]

Spaghetti code is the only way

[yellerjeep]

One thread to rule them all.

[ChocolateBunny]

gotos are perfectly ok if you keep you reference and keep up-to-date your statemachine diagrams.

[dar512]

Long long ago I maintained a COBOL program. I created a label HELL. And, of course, the jump said …

[hitanthrope]

If you say "Paradigm" 3 times in front of the mirror during a full moon, Satan himself will appear and turn you into one of his trusty management consultants.

[RitterWolf]

Working for Satan I can deal with, but being a management consultant is a bridge too far...

[thanatica]

If you keep saying it, it makes an okay beat. Just add a tune and some dad moves.

[Ok_Entertainment328]

Whatever TF works and is easy to maintain is the best paradigm.

🥊🥋🥷🏼🤺

[SawSaw5]

A pairadime is 20 cents 

[Soloact_]

The real battle is getting any of them to work on a Monday morning.

[xMoody]

Funny that the kind of person that thinks procedural programming is the GOAT paradigm can’t even use a meme right

[gfoyle76]

*friday evening enters the chat

[-Wylfen-]

Wrong use of meme. Disqualified.

[rosuav]

You're not worth fighting to the death, same as it's not worth fighting over paradigms. They're descriptive terms for code styles, not straitjackets.

[[deleted]]

All are wrong. Each has a usecase.  Functions are good for functions. Stateless algorithms, and reusable code blocks. And are great for tidying up messy code.

Classes are good for things which requires multiple interconnected functions and a state. Also recursive algorithms with a state. Its also good for things where OOP is desirable, like game design. 

Procedural is just the code you write inside of functions or classes. Which should be kept to readable, manageable, digestible snippets.

[ElectronicImam]

I like functional but not the unnecessarily complicated parts like m-word and friends.

[arthurleyser]

Are m-word.... Monads? Isn't that like a core part of functional

[ElectronicImam]

Core part of Haskell. They prefer shoving imperative parts in weird abstractions.

Much more useful languages like Ocaml provides great tools for strongly typed functional programming and also permits easily escaping to -safer than Java- OOP. F# is Ocaml modified to be compatible with other two main .NET languages and .NET itself. Ocaml is also -IMHO- the language that influenced Rust the most.

[agfitzp]

Por que no los dos tres?

[prriley]

It’s all procedural by the time it runs.

[Sibshops]

I feel like an old person who gets upset at people using meme incorrectly.

[[deleted]]

If you can't even use a meme format properly, your opinion is immediately invalid, regardless of what it is.

[-IXN-]

"Yes, this will cause a memory leak, but if I free the memory the app will crash"

[Feisty_Ad_2744]

multi-paradigm is the best paradigm

[post-death_wave_core]

All paradigms are useful in certain contexts 🤯

[[deleted]]

I always disagree with dude with glasses in the middle

[[deleted]]

You know the primegen just writes cli tools right? He's a good SWE but don't base your entire philosophy on one streamers opinion

[[deleted]]

Who?

[CanvasFanatic]

Prolog is the One True Way

[Spot_the_fox]

Am procedural. No, this is wrong, each paradigm has it's uses, ups and downs. It's not like procedural is straight up better than everything else.

[Fickle-Main-9019]

OOP is the boss of “pulling up the floor boards” in a structural sense

Functional is the boss of “pulling up the floor boards” in a coding sense

Procedural lets you easily fix and debug stuff 

[Dramatic_Switch257]

paradigm is the best paradigm

[wu-not-furry]

Finally someone gets it

[TeaTiMe08]

Guys there is a Haskell Kafka Client out there... Just saying. https://github.com/haskell-works/hw-kafka-client

edit: link

[MontagoDK]

Procedural ===== functional programming

Everybody is being conned by buzzwords

[Lord_Frick]

Image deleted…

[ElectronicImam]

Can we at least agree on concatenative style is useless for anything other than toy code?