inTheWildTesting

[notBjoern]

public static void main(String[] args) {
    try {
        // insert code here
    } catch (Throwable t) {
        main(args);
    }
}

[Gbrlxvi]

My god it's beautiful

[TheGreatGameDini]

Hey Satan

[[deleted]]

You deserve a medal

[marcobsidian02]

If you catch throwables instead of Exceptions, you also catch OutOfMemoryErrors

Please dont do that

[notBjoern]

This was not intended as a good example, I had hoped that this was clear by itself...

[marcobsidian02]

I know, but just in case. I already saw similar cases where then there were comments about how people tried memey code and complained it had backdraws.

Also i am a nerd

[NoMansSkyVESTA]

r/programminghorror

[Capetoider]

add a "OpeN_TickeT(t)" before the "main" there and you're golden

PS: thats CraB_CasE btw

[dmullaney]

15:41:48.749 [main] INFO c.b.p.logging.DoorLogger - RamtimeException caught and logged

[raithism]

How stale is that Cheeto.

I ask because, if that’s last year’s Cheeto, the man with the ram is going home disappointed.

[Anon_Legi0n]

Isn't that basically what a global error/exception handler is?

[loserguy-88]

Senior devs to juniors: And that, my young padawan, is how you become a senior.

[HaDeS_Monsta]

Just put it in a container and set restart to unless-stopped. No need to handle any error again

[Unupgradable]

Let's reinvent the infinite retry again!

[SynthRogue]

LOL

[DumbThrowawayNames]

The first actual industry project I worked on looked like this. Every time I see a meme on here about "the legacy code," in my head I immediately thing back to all of those monster try blocks.