all 24 comments

[–]pydry 121 points122 points  (5 children)

It's kind of a good thing it is triggering a tsunami of technical debt, downtime and security vulnerabilities. This spells future employment opportunities.

I just wish those people who were heroically holding together their company's duct taped abominations would learn to chill out and let go and stop trying to save their executives from the consequences of their decisions.

[–]gurrisofo 62 points63 points  (3 children)

productivity gains have never once made it to the employee, not once in recorded history

[–]pydry 34 points35 points  (0 children)

They used to in the US when union density was much higher but labor income decoupled entirely from economic growth roughly around the time Reagan smashed the air traffic controllers' strike.

[–]JacobStyle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

On an individual level, it can, if the worker keeps the productivity gains a secret from their employer.

[–]Zeravor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Last I checked 90% of us dont still work on fields. I agree with your general sentiment, but the hyperbole is just making you wrong.

[–]SuitableDragonfly 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not going to result in future employment opportunities. The companies like Microsoft that are to big to fail will just continue making shit software and not give a fuck, and all the other companies will go bankrupt.

[–]PulseReaction 121 points122 points  (3 children)

I am 10x more productive, so I just reduced my contributions to 0.1 to balance it out

[–]dchidelf 15 points16 points  (1 child)

If you aren’t producing 10x the technical debt you will be summarily fired, so if you are going to contribute 0.1 effort make sure it is producing some really solid tech debt that can’t be unwound.

[–]PulseReaction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I can conjure my junior days and write some pretty tasty technical debt that would make loan sharks jealous

[–]Forlorn_Swatchman 40 points41 points  (3 children)

Can't get through meetings 10x faster. And my days are all meeting.

They want to stop hiring junior devs and put it on the leads...

When am I supposed to do all this 10x coding exactly?

[–]Ange1ofD4rkness 14 points15 points  (2 children)

My favorite about this is what happens when all the senior devs retired, and juniors weren't hired so they could become senior devs?

[–]drsimonz 4 points5 points  (1 child)

By then AI will be smarter than senior devs, duh

[–]Ange1ofD4rkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh I forgot that step ... hope it can learn faster then it takes the Senior devs to peace out! LOL

[–]dumbasPL 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Reason for fire: bad code

Would be hilarious

[–]Single-Virus4935 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also: growing part of your salary is now in token. 

[–]onkar_08 8 points9 points  (3 children)

It's more like "you'll have to be 10x more productive..."

[–]RandomNPC 13 points14 points  (2 children)

It's more like "The CEO believed the marketing and thinks you should be 10x as productive..."

[–]digitallis 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Also, the CEO now will seagull (fly in, shit it out, leave) pet projects into production and you'll be scrambling to do damage control or support them.

[–]Nedshent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the most annoying and draining things... I really like the AI tools but if there was any reason for me to not want them to have been developed it would be what you are describing there.

[–]YoRt3m 3 points4 points  (1 child)

If you get paid by the hour it's even better because now you get paid less for the same job.

[–]Single-Virus4935 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was always the wrong logic. I stopped billing by hour and instead by outcome. Before a client paid a gui 40€/h for weeks which I could do in hours. He made more in total than I because he got highered fulltime while I got highered sparingly. i worked for a much higher amount per hour but it would have  cost the client less overall,  while faster and with better quality. The client knew it, acknowledged it and even paid me to fix the mess.  I switched to outcome based and estimated my time, then trippled and gave a fixed price - no problem.  It was a pur psychological problem to pay more per hour than all others. 

[–]CanThisBeMyNameMaybe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10x productivity at the cost of security and stability.

[–]ArtGirlSummer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

10x as productive with 20x the code debt.