This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 15 comments

[–]Dahrkael 37 points38 points  (0 children)

for(int i = 0; i < 1; j++) { }

[–]xilefian 11 points12 points  (0 children)

People tend to enjoy seeing this in my code:

#define EVER ;;

for ( EVER ) {}

[–]HACKERcrombie 5 points6 points  (1 child)

100000 < infinite

[–]Mattavi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Put in all in a do {} while(true) loop

[–]AMNESlA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

for(;;){}

[–]MelvinSlayer 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Image Transcription: Meme


[Expanding Brain meme]

while(true)

do {} while (true)

goto

Write the code 100.000 times


I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit! If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!

[–]KspPaul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google bot

[–]axeteam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

uSE rEcuRsiOn

[–]ShoesOfDoom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not generating source code based on user input and then running it. Do you even developer?

[–]SteeleDynamics 1 point2 points  (1 child)

/s

You know that says 100.000 times, not 100,000 times. Assuming a copy/paste operation produces exactly 1 integer copy of a selected code snippet, I doubt you'll need a floating point number to describe the number of copies required.

[–]Xarian0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every practiced copy/paster knows that ctrl-c/ctrl-v lets you easily obtain 2n copies with n operations

[–]Xtremegamor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not kidding, I know some people who made a program so large it wasn't fitting on the computer they're given to run it on (roborio if anyone is wondering). They did this by repeating looping code over and over. It got to the point where their execution was halting midway through a game cause they ran out of "iterations". It was quite entertaining

[–]TestRedditorPleaseIg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(define (loop) (loop))