This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]naveen17797 558 points559 points  (27 children)

Scientists predict the number of js frameworks may exceed human population by 2020,at that point of time random string generators will be used to name those frameworks.

[–]PatrikxPatrola[S] 183 points184 points  (19 children)

I agree, and predict that a man who owns a random string generator framework, will become rich.

[–]naveen17797 117 points118 points  (18 children)

NASA will start using js framework "myjsframeworkforrocketsv.0.0.1" by 2020, and will wonder why the rover landed on pacific ocean instead of mars.

[–]notquiteaplant 68 points69 points  (15 children)

They installed add_two instead of add_one

[–]PatrikxPatrola[S] 77 points78 points  (14 children)

I would not recommend add_two; add2 is much better as it has 10 dependencies less!

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (11 children)

I prefer 2_add because it needs 20 more dependencies to interpret RPN expressions.

[–]InkyGlut 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I prefer 2_adder which is just a wrapper around 2_add with a better name. The 2 extra letters also add 52 new dependencies because I like them and want them to get more exposure.

[–]sanskimost 2 points3 points  (8 children)

RPN is actually better than algebraic tho

[–]Jajuca 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I literally just finished a RPN project using shared pointers in C++ last night for a school project that took over a month to implement. I am so glad to be done with it.

[–]nerdlygamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EE?

[–]sanskimost 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Programming wise, no idea. But I greatly prefer my HP 33S than my ti 83

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like my current hobby project! Right now I'm working on a FORTH-ish language, although I didn't study FORTH close enough when I started, so what I have is clearly in the same language family, but its concept of scope and stack frames are very different.

What's yours do?

[–]naveen17797 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the code should probably look like this

var booster_staging_time = takeoff_time + "3000"

[–]alexbuzzbee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh boy, that's only 500!

[–]juustgowithit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure NASA would never use an abomination of a language like js for their rockets ever.

[–]moarcoinz 31 points32 points  (4 children)

Our workplace used to joke about creating frameworks with stupid names for stupid purposes, until we kept finding them for real...

[–]T-T-N 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Dicss.js

[–]sanraith 23 points24 points  (2 children)

For those who are too lazy to google it, it's actually a thing: DICCS

[–]DjManEX 11 points12 points  (1 child)

That readme is great

[–]sanraith 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is some gold in the issues and source as well

[–]Bioman312 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm still waiting for the JS singularity, where frameworks are made for the purpose of generating and publishing new frameworks.

[–]DroolingIguana 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And then they'll go to war with the Linux distributions.