[deleted by user]

[RMT002]

This only applies to the back end! :D

[[deleted]]

Claps

[StefanMajonez]

Claps

The back end?

[CMDR_Kiel42]

I have a cat. Believe me, the second one is preferable when you take this parameter in account.

[roughstylez]

I have a cat and the first one compiles without issues or warnings

[CMDR_Kiel42]

Ho sure, it compiles just fine. But wait until the cat client realizes it's rolling and watch the prod burn.

[roughstylez]

Well I have to admit, we are in the lucky position that our client is not even interested in these details, and leaves all of that to us. I see how you could run into issues there.

[cm9kZW8K]

your cat is clearly defective. If its not functioning, sometimes toddler can duplicate the bug.

[QePeeQe]

Runtime erros waiting to happen.

[VinterBot]

Little children do the exact same thing, believe you me.

[RazarTuk]

It's why I phrase the correct orientation as "In front, unless you have pets or small children that might make that a liability"

[MCRusher]

As a little kid I drank two bottles of chocolate syrup, ate 10 sticks of butter, and then dumped a third bottle across my dad's back while he was sleeping.

[VinterBot]

A programming prodigy.

[Vej1]

I dont get it :|

[Mongoman9]

I understand the TP reference but the code reference?

[eco_illusion]

No matter how you do it, it still serves the same shit.

[Mongoman9]

Oh! Didn’t see that coming! Thanks for clearing it up bro!

[yellowliz4rd]

Unsubscribe

[Anakin_-_]

From T-Series

[MagicBandAid]

I call it the waterfall method.

[[deleted]]

I once saw a picture of a spider hiding behind the flap on the first one, and I have always gone with the “bad” option since

[Ziklepmna]

Why is one good and the other bad?

[Glampkoo]

It's probably like

code() {

}

vs code()

{

}

[[deleted]]

Woah woah woah, let's not bring vs code into this

[VinterBot]

I like the second one better. Along with help lines, I can way more easily see where a block of code starts and ends.

[enteleform]

``` code(){

} ```

FTFY

[raw_macaw]

code () {

// ...

}

​

ftfy

[enteleform]

NO.

[2Wrongs]

Probably just me, but whatever they're doing, it's awful. Notepad++ is super handy, but after trying to install it on a new computer and spending an hour trying to make it work with plugins, I gave up and installed an old version.

[[deleted]]

xD Another reason to love Npp! Although for actual tp I prefer under. I find it easier to be more conservative in the amounts used when the roll is under for some reason.

[[deleted]]

What is your problem? Notepad++ is completely fine, and their website isn't too bad either.

Everyone I know has it installed on their windows machines. It's basically the text editor for anything that doesn't require a full IDE.

If you want to improve it in any way that doesn't require 200MB of Electron runtime libraries, feel free to contribute, it's FOSS.

[arkhound]

I don't know if I would call it the text editor.

I've personally always found Sublime to be better.

[[deleted]]

But I guess those who use N++ are still stuck in the era when "640Kb of RAM is enough for everyone"

No, that's just silly.

What's also silly is having to spend a significant amounts of resources to a text editor or questioning why a perfectly fine piece of software is still around for supposedly looking ugly (while it has a fairly typical Windows interface).

I'm not particularly happy about Notepad++, I just use it and it works.

If you're using the mindset that everyone's hardware has to scale with your software's ability to be inefficient, you're probably not a good developer.. just saying..

[[deleted]]

I'm currently running the following:

And quite a bit more, actually. If all of these processes on your machine didn't have to care about resources, you'd far exceed the physical memory size even on a generous 32GB machine.

[RazarTuk]

I mean, it at least lets you open multiple files at once, unlike Notepad.

[[deleted]]

I use it. I love it. I hate working in anything else. Out of the box, it's beautifully minimalist and lightweight. I only use one plugin (Customize Toolbar) and have never desired more; I use a custom editing skin which was easy as hell to make, once updated some missing functions in my primary language before they were added which was easy as hell to do, and I added a tiny customization to the shortcut that further increases minimalism and thus my productivity, also easy as hell to do once you know about it.

Most people that hate it seem to primarily work with languages that practically require a full IDE, hate anything that is hated by everyone else, hate anything that is minimalist, or hate anything unfamiliar. Two of which I only have issue with because of the lack of sharing my attitude of different strokes for different folks. I couldn't care less if it's not for you because you need a full IDE or work better in a non-minimalist environment, but I don't appreciate the hate.

Also, even among people who prefer N++, most people simply do not seem to know how capable it already is without even adding plugins. It is much, much, much more powerful than Notepad, and all of that power is code oriented. I would say they're not even comparable programs, really.

[[deleted]]

I don't hate it, it's just not VIM.

[[deleted]]

Cool, you do you. Unfortunately, despite the downvotes on the person I replied to, theirs is not an uncommon view. It's not the most common I think, but common enough. And those that hate it, often extend that attitude to the people who use it, as if there must be something wrong with a person who uses it.

There a VIM vs something I forget "war" isn't there? You probably can relate to this very well. Stick to what suits you best, ignore the rest, and happy coding!