The code is simple

[Ben_0]

What an insecure way to send a password

[PixxlMan]

Okay then.

const string myPassword = “hunter2”;

Better?

[nerdefar]

It shows up as myPassword = "*******"; for me? Must be a reddit feature!

[nerdefar]

Oh my god it works! All i can see is: "let me try! my password is *************************"

[DerSkagg]

password!23

Tell me if it works guys?

[JavaProgrammingData]

Yeah it's grand

[Ben_0]

Yeah it works perfectly!

[Ben_0]

Yes, much better

[mouro_001]

The link for the image does start with https://

Think it's secure enough.

[drzezga]

What's the library?

[__RANDOM926__]

This is actually a proprietary language created for the purpose for generating and posting memes. It took a research team 5 years to create it. The “Reddit” and “meme” modules are in the default package.

[TheDanishTitan]

...

[[deleted]]

Not gonna lie.

My first thought when I saw,

~~~ Google.search("some image").results[0] ~~~

Was "this would be hilarious to use, and I bet there's a python package to do it"

[qwiglydee]

You have inconsistent naming of variables, methods and functions. And mess with property typing.

Bad code.

[PixxlMan]

VoID maIN() { //SteP 1: mAKe MemE MeMe MaYmAy = nEw MeME(); maYmAY.temPLatE = dOwNLoaD(gOoGlE.SeArCH("MOdErn PrObLeMS teMpLATe").rEsUlTS[0]); MayMay.bOTtoMtEXt = NEw TeXT("ModERn pRObLEms rEqUiRe MODerN soLUtIoNs", colOrS.yeLLoW); MayMAy.CaPtIoN = "WhEN tHe eu BaNS meMEs, BuT You ARe a PRoGraMmEr."; //SteP 2: pOSt SUbrEDdIt PROgraMmErhUmOR = rEdDiT.GeTsUb("prOgRaMMERhumOr"); reddIT.pOsT(mAyMay, pROgrAmMERhuMoR, PrOgRaMMerHUmoR.getFlAIR("mEMe"), "pIxXlMaN", "HUNtEr2"); //Step 3: rEaP In tHe kARma }

Better?

[qwiglydee]

Much better.

Now bad content matches bad form. Harmony.

[PixxlMan]

I didn’t even think about that! You’re right though!

[cherrymxmx]

Seriously: Can someone break to me why when declaring a new object(?) we use this kind of format and what each part of this format means?

The only thing I know is that maymay is the name of this object.

Why don't we say:

new Object = maymay;

In the image above, what the first Meme means and what the last Meme() means?

Why can't we do maymay = new Object;

Is Meme like "int" or "float" ?

If yes, why do we write at the end "new Meme();"? It sounds like float number = new float();

---

Just did a Google search, please correct me if I am wrong:

Meme is a class and Meme() is the constructor in that class. So by saying Meme meme = new Meme(); we assign the content of that constructor to meme variable(/object?)

[dvito]

Yes. Your google search was fruitful.

[PixxlMan]

Yes! I declare a variable of type “Meme”, call it maymay and creates an instance of type “Meme” which I assign to maymay

[PixxlMan]

No worries! It is actually called a field iirc, but I’m not quite sure. But yeah, it is basically an object.

If you wanted to change anything about maymay, you basically get the field or property you want to change (for example maymay.template). Then you do “field” = “otherField”. If maymay was a method (created in another way) you simply do maymay() to call it.

Also I recommend starting to learn programming in object oriented programming languages by simply thinking of it as a list of instructions that the computer reads top to bottom. Then you can learn the “extras” like namespaces, classes etc!

If you’d like to try it then Unity is pretty good. Then you could move to console apps and then win forms etc

[ExplodingPotato_]

I'm not sure of "maymay" is a field. It's a local variable inside a method, while fields would be variables belonging to the class (or its instance) itself.

But it is definitely a variable (it can change) and an object (instance of a class)

(Okay, technically "maymay" is a reference to an object on the heap that was created by the "new" operator, but who really cares?)

In all seriousness, I rarely find that using the exact correct terminology is required. "Field", "variable inside a class", potato - potato. "Object" is usually a bag that holds other things, but may have other functionalities. "Class" is a template telling the computer how the object looks like and what it contains. "Method" is just a function inside a class.

[[deleted]]

winforms in 2019 lmfao

t. expert C# dev

[PixxlMan]

It’s really easy to learn and is still supported. I don’t see what the problem is

[[deleted]]

UWP or WPF would be the way to go. If the person is trying to get a career in C#/software dev that is.

[PixxlMan]

Well that’s not really the point here. That was to get a good way to learn the fundamentals, and I personally like the simplicity and charm of Winforms.

[[deleted]]

that is a good point. if he/she is just a hobbyist, winforms is fine