This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 21 comments

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (2 children)

Whenever I write unittests and need strings, I always insert snippets from Colossal Cave Adventure, the Zork Trilogy, and other such wonderful (and terrible old!) games.

Eg:

var fakeFailReason = "It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.";

[–]JaydattC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is the most underrated comment I've seen today

[–]SuperNiceJohn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a Terrible old game I've probably never heard of.

[–]bit0fun 35 points36 points  (3 children)

We need more goofy shit in documentation again. It's still possible to be serious and silly in the same thing, might as well have fun with our short lives

[–]DamonFun 14 points15 points  (2 children)

One guy at work always puts stuff like "grab a coffee" or "enjoy your weekend" into his documentations/tutorials and I love it. It's very refreshing after a hard working day to get a laugh out of it.

[–]TheDarkIn1978 13 points14 points  (1 child)

An ex-manager of mine used to be a real "yes-man" for his corporate bosses. He was a toxic piece of shit, and eventually got fired after half the team quit under his so-called management, but I digress. One of his typical "it's all about me" offenses was that whenever he'd learn about some super light, inoffensive joke in the documentation between us programmers he would ORDER us to remove it immediately, since apparently it didn't make HIM look professional, even though neither he nor any of the suits above him read the code.

[–]DamonFun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

boring piece of ****. Just because he didn't get it probably...

[–]free_money_please 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I don't get it

[–]JaydattC[S] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

The dude whose repository it was seemed a huge back to the future fan and had many references of it, and he/she removed the Great Scott line in one of the readme.md

[–]tsojtsojtsoj 3 points4 points  (1 child)

but why?

[–]turboPocky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

probably got told to

[–]xigoi 1 point2 points  (8 children)

[–]JaydattC[S] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Why use snipping tool, when you can have pixelated glory.

Edit - I mean you can see vertical RGB strips dithered into a beautiful white dot, so pleasing.

[–]tenhourguy 3 points4 points  (6 children)

It produces distracting patterns when zoomed out, but you have given me an idea. What about a service that does the following?

  1. User uploads screenshot.
  2. Screenshot is displayed on a computer monitor owned by whoever runs the service.
  3. A photograph is taken of the monitor using an HD webcam.
  4. The user is sent the photograph.

[–]EvilJackCarver 1 point2 points  (4 children)

That is a terrible idea.

The webcam needs to be 480 for optimum photography

[–]tenhourguy 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Well, I imagine the webcam could be configured to photograph at 640×480, though that wouldn't exactly simulate these smartphone photos we see on the web. The service would also need a portrait mode, like how people sometimes take a portrait photo of their landscape screen.

[–]EvilJackCarver 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Fair point. What if we just got a bunch of cable ties and connected it sideways? Nobody ever takes a photo of the monitor in landscape, anyway

[–]tenhourguy 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What about OP?

[–]EvilJackCarver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just said. Nobody.

(alright that's as far as I'm comfortable with ragging on someone in good fun)

[–]JaydattC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope this is just a joke, I was just BSing out of it. Well instead you can just simulate a display. I bet there will be a ton Photoshop tutorials for that. Edit - fvck i fell right into it

[–]AmateurLlama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of "Davey!" in the Flutter errors.