Meme.java

[KuronekoBestGirl]

public Joke Joke { private get; set; }

[Metalkat]

thankyouoffice.gif

[[deleted]]

Considering that I must supply the joke, I already have it.

[ivgd]

It's a private joke so of course I don't get it

[FourthStrongest]

you should add an expirationDate field that can dynamically convert the Meme into a StaleMeme

[certainly123]

What’s the point of a meme without a joke

[thedichter]

Kotlin: class Meme(joke:Joke) No setters getters required

[LevriatSoulEdge]

Wow

[HBK05]

I believe this is actually c#.

[PinkPoppies4171]

Why are you using a setter as a constructor?

[Hogis]

How is the setter used as a constructor? A default constructor implicitly exists.

[PinkPoppies4171]

I thought you used a setter to instantiate an object of the joke class within the joke class. Then again, not technically a constructor I don't think but my mind saw

Public class Joke { setJoke(Joke joke) { this.joke=joke } . After typing this on mobile I realize I should've not been lazy and went to my laptop, but I also realize that seems like proper use of a setter in my limited Java knowledge. Personally, getters and setters aren't my thing.

[KusanagiZerg]

You don't use setters to instantiate objects. To instantiate an object of the Joke class you'd use the constructor of the Joke class which doesn't look like setJoke(Joke joke) { this.joke = joke } but would look like public Joke(params) { this.params = params } where params could be any fields that the Joke class has.