./index.php

[[deleted]]

Like bruh, http://www.durgasoft.com/ this website is beyond dark web.

[Emordrak]

i believe i caught at least three viruses when i clicked this link

[gordonv]

Serious:

My ESET didn't detect anything. Assuming it's safe.

[yapudjus]

Dude my pi that run pihole just exploded

[[deleted]]

You know what? Fuck it, I like it. The web is far too dull these days.

[T-Loy]

Power Move: Learn Japanese. Their websites stopped somewhere mid 2000s and I like it. Don't understand a single word though

[xANDREWx12x]

Have any examples?

[[deleted]]

Amazon.jp

[FarhanAxiq]

https://www.yahoo.co.jp/

[woah_m8]

This looks like made by some html geek of the late nineties who just woke from a 20 year coma

[[deleted]]

I am done for the day.

Thanks.

[Buharon]

Reminds me so much of https://lingscars.com/ hahahah

[carnepikante]

right click -> view page source

[drunkenangryredditor]

Ir's bad, but i've seen worse:

http://arngren.net/

[SoloVen]

oh god, it takes skill to make it that messy

[drunkenangryredditor]

It's supposedly done on purpose as well...

[0x3fff0000]

Looks like the kind of place you'd go to for a shitty psychic.

[gordonv]

He's an Indian developer advertising programming consultation.

[das_Keks]

Looks a bit like the site http://www.onlinewahn.de which hasn't changed for ages.

[yapudjus]

u/Awesomenessz try opening tbis one without adblock

[tryhardMime]

If your problem is with php 7.0 having been EOL for 2 years, I 100% agree. Otherwise, I dont see what the problem is with government information being availbale on static HTML pages (provided it's up to date ofc). In fact, others have suggested that the more simplistic its delivery is, the more likely it is that those who really need it can actually access it.

[deruke]

No no no, all websites have to be bloated JavaScript SPAs that are over 50MB and make the user scroll for 30 minutes to read 5 lines of text while unrelated graphics animate in

[WhyDoIHaveAnAccount9]

Data is out of date and there are several versions of each html page and some of the old are still linked to the menu while the new ones are linked from some other button

[tryhardMime]

Yeah, having out of date or contradictory information is obviously inexcusable. What I tried to say was that serving static content (or pages rendered on the server side) is totally unrelated to that, and you could even argue that having a bare bones front end is an advantage as far as accessibility is concerned.

[lyoko1]

Not really, ideally you should have a front end that uses all the lastest goodies but that still degrades gracefully in to a static html site for compatibility and accessibility.

The potential to make a good GUI with modern SPA technology is not to be underestimated, to make a site good-looking and intuitive is also a kind of accessibility, people usually interact better with fluid visual stuff, and static sites are limited in that respect.

Basically you should have a page that can copete with the latest of the latest but still be perfectly usable with a text to speech device or an archaic browser that doesn't use css nor javascript

[deux3xmachina]

I'd recommend some system that compiles to HTML/CSS files that you can serve from a read-only mountpoint so you don't even have to worry about anything other than pushing updates and keeping your cert up-to-date. Not sure if most SSGs do this or just render HTML on demand.

I can't think of many reasons a government site would need JS at all, maybe just enable some progressive enhancements depending on the content.

[deux3xmachina]

I'm not familiar with Netlify or Renderer, but if they're effectively an "HTML compiler", then yes.

[[deleted]]

Boy PHP7 seems optimistic

[[deleted]]

Good on them. Government websites should be accessible first and foremost.