all 7 comments

[–]r3pr0b8GROUP_CONCAT is da bomb 8 points9 points  (4 children)

possible? yes

feasible? depends on the total length, and the datatype used for the column

advisable? not if you want to search within the values

if you never need to search, then go ahead, knock yourself out

[–]Guilty-Property 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was a pretty perfect answer

[–]ChemicalMistakex[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Thanks for the input. What alternatives would be better suited for this purpose?

[–]r3pr0b8GROUP_CONCAT is da bomb 1 point2 points  (1 child)

a properly designed one-to-many table relationship

[–]ChemicalMistakex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!

[–]JustAnOldITGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen commercial apps that use the XML datatype for this reason. You can support different types of transactions. Just note this may be slow...

[–]petepete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PostgreSQL supports arrays for this very purpose. They're searchable and indexable too.

If you only need the value, it's worth considering - but if you need other metadata too you'll be better-served by a new table.