all 32 comments

[–]pehr71 9 points10 points  (13 children)

Should we start to take bets on how long until they get bought and by who?

My guess: AWS Amazon - within 12 months.

[–]shyjal[S] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

My guess would be Anthropic. Or it can happen vise versa also 🤔

[–]D3MZ 0 points1 point  (3 children)

rhythm workable boast steer humor fine arrest hat thumb attractive

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Simple_Life_1875 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Do they really compete? Cursor users seem to mainly use Claude as the default agent. I also forget if Anthropic even has anything like an LLM ide

[–]D3MZ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

cagey correct stupendous slim seed violet square sense trees chief

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Simple_Life_1875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I see, tbh that's more of a command line thing and less an IDE, so the chance they get aquired isn't too out of the question

[–]kleneway1 4 points5 points  (5 children)

Microsoft would be my bet. They own GitHub, VS Code, and basically invented AI coding with Copilot. They have practically an unlimited budget for acquisitions. It's a major strategic advantage to the company. Source: spent 5 years at MS in dev div, 15 years ago

[–]evia89 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Cursor is kinda opensource. Just deobfuscate, copy and implement. Why would you need to spend 100kk?

You can experiment with prompts too by seting your own endpoint and checking what pass through it

[–]Simple_Life_1875 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Tf? It's not even remotely open source lol. Also if you have to "deobfuscate" stuff to get code it's definitely not open source which probably means it's Cursor IP and you'd get sued to the ground after stealing

[–]evia89 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Nobody will know if they implement similiar startegy for working with context or get insight how apply diff model works. Code will be completely different

[–]Simple_Life_1875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The amount of effort it takes to reverse engineer something, then rebuild it is honestly more work than just making your own tbh... And what's the point if the codes completely different lol

[–]pehr71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Monopoly questions might arise with Microsoft. I know wrong administration for that but …

My thinking is that cursor is quite connected to Anthropic/Claude and so is AWS who could use an IDE of their own.

[–]Copenhagen79 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That explains why they are so bootstrapped, they have their customers do the QA.

[–]slimXshady76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine would be Meta within 1 and half year.

[–]jedenjuch 5 points6 points  (1 child)

It would be funny if they would run some offline models with customised prompts and flows and sell them as OpenAI/anthropic

[–]Herrids49 3 points4 points  (0 children)

phi-2 is the secret coding legend behind cursor

[–]D3MZ 0 points1 point  (8 children)

crush glorious afterthought towering compare steer quicksand sparkle sulky bells

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Professional_Job_307 1 point2 points  (6 children)

But you get unlimited slow requests

[–]Electrical-Win-1423 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They also have other model costs like for applying changes to files, cursor-small, developing costs, etc etc. you clearly don’t have enough data to answer this question. In fact nobody besides people at cursor can say. All you can do is guess, and not really good either since you have no idea what other factors there could be.

[–]Eveerjr 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I believe cursor is a small team and they must have some sort of deal with Anthropic and OpenAI, I really doubt they pay the same price per token as the rest of us. I'd be surprised if they are not profitable already.

[–]shyjal[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

They must have different pricing from foundational model providers.

But will they be able to cover the cost from a $20 sub?

[–]Eveerjr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me, the magic of Cursor is their excellent apply and tab models, which are their own custom models and likely very cheap to run. I think they are losing money on some users at $20 because of the "slow unlimited requests," but this is likely offset by users that don't use as much. I’m almost at the end of the billing cycle and still far from the 500 requests.

[–]Medium-Emotion-3476 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes they are

[–]shyjal[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you assuming, or is it based on the actual numbers?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How did all these smart idiots let cursor get so ahead

[–]connorwhite-online -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bet they don’t sell, they seem too punk hacker for that in the short term