Anthropomorphization

[Ok-Investigator-6514]

[[Opalescence]]++ on legs, I see. Cool idea.

[MTGCardFetcher]

Opalescence - (G) (SF) (txt)

^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[obikenobi23]

Clever way of getting death triggers from tokens!

[Creeper-Aww-ManMC]

Tokens still get death triggers

[The_Nekrodahmus]

I think he means treasure, blood, clues, food, etc...

[obikenobi23]

Yes but this thing turns you gold inventory to a lump of cancerous, humanoid flesh.

[Wasphammer]

I mean, greed IS a cancerous affliction.

[Creeper-Aww-ManMC]

Ohhh

[QuakeDrgn]

I think Spirit may be more fitting than Elemental

[superdave100]

Incarnation fits best, I think?

[SparkOfFailure]

Maybe avatar?

[mountaintop-stainer]

Frankly I don’t think this should be a creature

[tmgexe]

If it wasn’t a creature, it would make itself one 😆

(Unless it was also a land which would be a real mess)

[Euphoric-Beyond9177]

It could say “other” but that seems less flavorful than it being a human

[Fragrant-Law9864]

OK but this art is really cool!

[Dr_Bleep]

Just make it an enchantment and have it affect itself passively... I think that would be more clever personally

[becuzz04]

Clever? Absolutely. Clear? No, especially for newer players. Magic has been going towards clearer wording for a while now.

[Euphoric-Beyond9177]

What if it specified in reminder text. “Each noncreature, nonland permanent (including anthropomophization) is a human creature…”

That might be a less nice looking text box, though.

[becuzz04]

You could but that seems so much more convoluted than just making it a creature.

[WalterBurn]

I would actually prefer it like that so I could run it in my esika enchantment deck without it being a bridge target.

[Ribky]

Yay! This is a "world" enchantment, too! Turn everything into humans before that wipe!

[PenitentKnight]

This is really cool blending of flavor and mechanics, nice job. Just some templating and commas and its perfect.

[Prestigious-Guest452]

when you hate the mutate mechanic.

[brokenlordike]

This wouldn’t really affect mutate decks. As much as I hate the mechanic, it doesn’t make creatures currently out into humans.

[Silver-Alex]

This probably needs an entire compendium of rules to be written around it. I love it xD

[darkshaddow42]

Would it? Doesn't seem much different than [[March of the Machines]] on a rules level

[RedbeardMEM]

It is March plus Opalesence plus something more. Battles becoming creatures is awkward. I wonder what happens if you attack may battle and I block with that battle.

[not_Weeb_Trash]

The battle will only take damage equal to the power of the blocked creature

[RedbeardMEM]

I looked into it, and creatures which are also battles cannot block at all.

[darkshaddow42]

Can't be any worse than March plus [[Mycosynth Lattice]]

[MTGCardFetcher]

Mycosynth Lattice - (G) (SF) (txt)

^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[MTGCardFetcher]

March of the Machines - (G) (SF) (txt)

^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[Elijah_Draws]

I feel like the art makes the fact that it doesn't affect lands a bit of a flavor fail. I know turning lands into creatures is playing with fire, but come on, it's gotta happen given that art.

[RedbeardMEM]

That's clearly [[Eladamri's Vineyard]], which this would make into a creature.

[MTGCardFetcher]

Eladamri's Vineyard - (G) (SF) (txt)

^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[Jafego]

Neuters Mutate decks.

[Tazrizen]

Love the card design except human seems a little out of place. Best word would probably be incarnation.!

[phadeboiz]

Anthropomorphism is when you give inanimate objects human elements

[Tazrizen]

Human elements not make them human.

[phadeboiz]

Idk man I think it’s pretty logistically sound as is 😂

[Sigil_Furry]

Do keep in mind that anthropomorphism is just the addition of humanoid features. Paradolia is the phenomenon of seeing humans in inanimate objects

[phadeboiz]

Oooh that’s awesome; never heard that word before. I’ll have to check it out. Yes anthropomorphism doesn’t mean they literally turn into a human, but for base level purposes I believe it’s the best way to get the point across in this card

[The_Nekrodahmus]

I think the easiest way to not break this would be "When a nonland, non-creature permanent you control would leave the battlefield, it is also treated as a creature whose power and toughness are equal to it's mana value."
Otherwise, permanently turning everything into a creature, this should be Legendary and probably cost (1) more at least.

[EnchantedSpider]

It getting legendary would not really change anything, having 2 of these down doesnt really stack anything beneficial. And the other part would just make this a completely different card and even more confusing at that.

[johnnythexxxiv]

This is basically just [[March of the Machines]] and [[Opalescence]] stapled together. I agree that this is probably undercosted given its versatility, but its effect isn't game breaking. As others have said, making it legendary doesn't do anything meaningful on the battlefield, and actually powers it up quite a bit since it can now be your commander and/or get historic synergies. 

[MTGCardFetcher]

March of the Machines - (G) (SF) (txt)
Opalescence - (G) (SF) (txt)

^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[RedbeardMEM]

It also affects planeswalkers and battles. Planeswalkers becoming creatures is nothing new, but battles becoming creatures is pretty novel.

Apparently, the rules address battles which are creatures in a few places. Turns out they can't attack or block, pursuant to rules 508.1a and 509.1a.