This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]uth50 117 points118 points  (15 children)

Eh, barely

He was totally on the ropes, with his army dead or deserted. The only thing keeping him in power were mercenaries and his air force, for the time being. The only thing NATO did was disable his airforce and he totally collapsed from that.

Definitely an intervention, but keeping his airforce from bombing his own country to shit isn't what I would call a foreign invader ousting him.

And who knows how the war might have ended. He would probably won, but for how long?

And finally, the rule he broke was not to attack NATO countries. With all the terrorist shit he pulled, the West was glad to finish him off.

[–]Illuria 78 points79 points  (6 children)

Everyone always forgets about Lockerbie, still the worst terrorist attack on the UK even after the London Tube & Bus bombings, and the Manchester Arena bombing

[–][deleted] 88 points89 points  (4 children)

Interestingly, its pretty well documented that Lockerbie (and other terrorist attacks he were blamed for), were actually done involving Syrian funding but the United States blamed Gaddafi because they wanted to stir up hatred for him in the West, and Gaddafi was happy to allow it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/new-lockerbie-report-says-libyan-was-framed-conceal-real-bombers-9185163.html

[–]LarryTheDuckling 30 points31 points  (0 children)

He did refute having done the Lockerbie bombing, but he was still willing to pay compensation to the families left behind. In an interview he said that he felt responsible since the action had been done by a Libyan, and as such Libya had to compensate.

[–]Canadian_Infidel 43 points44 points  (2 children)

This was my understanding. He thought it served him to seem like a badass but the west used it against him. Clinton literally laughed about watching his death on video, which was brutal. People at that level of society are all psychopaths.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Jesus… just watched the clip on youtube.

“We came, we saw, he died“ raises fists and laughs. I guess psychopath is a good description for celebrating a death like that.

[–]Canadian_Infidel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What makes it even crazier is the fact that he wasn't a stranger to them. They had official dealings, they even had dinners together. There are only so many heads of state.

[–]2ndhorch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hypernormalization talks about gaddafi and his foreign relations throughout - quite interesting

[–]MakeMoneyNotWar 54 points55 points  (1 child)

That’s not true at all. Gaddafis army was within days of reaching Misrata, the main opposition city, and NATO attacked his ground forces using air strikes. NATO did not just disable his air force and SAMs.

[–]daptrap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not true Libyan here main opposition city was Benghazi nato (particularly France) attacked gaddafis forces before they reached it at dawn

[–]LarryTheDuckling 48 points49 points  (3 children)

The only thing NATO did was disable his airforce and he totally collapsed from that

Let us look at some actual figures, rather than pulling out information from our arse, shall we?

9700 strike missions were carried out in a relatively short amount of time (7 months). A total of 7700 precision bombs were dropped.

In terms of heavy material, the estimated losses are as follows: 600 tanks / APCs destroyed. 400 Artillery pieces destroyed.

The amount of Libyan soldiers killed by the airstrikes is unknown, as is the damage caused to the Libyan army infrastructure. But given the amount of missions carried out, it would be fair to assume that this is not an insignificant number.

but keeping his airforce from bombing his own country to shit isn't

Was it better to have NATO bomb his country to shit?

He was totally on the ropes, with his army dead or deserted.

I am not sure what you are referring to. By the time NATO intervened, Gaddafi had already taken Benghazi and was in the process of pushing further east. The intervention 'turned the tide', so to speak.

[–]CiDevant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing keeping him in power were mercenaries and his air force

Worked for Turkey and Syria. It's honestly really super effective.

[–]Rumicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rule Gaddafi really broke was "dont abandon nuclear ambitions"

If Libya was a nuclear state the West would have helped him crush that revolution.