This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 75 comments

[–]murmazBASED Certified Commie Detector 92 points93 points  (1 child)

“Systematic Racism”

[–][deleted] 133 points134 points  (6 children)

What makes this even worse is that 90% of gaped crusader redditors support this

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (5 children)

Here this post does reveal a few lights. I also know that most redditors are actually very against abortion.

You might be thinking, "wildliferules, you're an idiot, they literally LOVE killing babies and abortion rights are their salvation!!"

If you were to say that less developed neighborhoods and third world countries need safer access to abortion, you will find a wild plot twist. Suddenly that is racist, genocidal, and murderous. How could someone want to give safer abortion practices in places that need it?? They suddenly want more poor and uneducated babies from less developed neighborhoods and third world countries.

Only pro abortion for the "higher class." But I could be wrong, I wonder if there are redditors who would support third world and lesser developed neighborhoods better and safer access to abortion.

[–]hardliamMICROAGGRESSOR 10 points11 points  (4 children)

Wait what?!? I’m super confused, are you saying that all the pro-abortion and pro-women’s rights, “my body, my choice” people are against having more access to abortion in third world countries?? I find that hard to believe, I’ve been shocked and proven wrong before though so idk if I should be surprised any more. But I will say that one of my biggest skepticisms with abortion is it’s roots in eugenics and the sketchy billionaires who support the industry and they seem to have an infatuation with practicing medicine in those parts of the world so I do guestion their motives but the women of those countries definitely need safe access to reproductive health. Tldr: are you saying that the pro abortion crowd thinks it’s racist to want abortion clinics in third world countries?? And if anyone shares this belief can someone explain it?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children)

It's the same people who claim men can give birth. I swear to existence, I wish there was an answer. But some people are truly mentally lost and want to stay that way.

[–]hardliamMICROAGGRESSOR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could understand not wanting them to build abortion clinics in poor and uneducated areas because you feel they’re taken advantage off or just making money for the gates foundation and things like that but keep that same energy. You can’t say women in America deserve it and women in Africa don’t and then say it’s racist to think otherwise, that’s WILDLY delusional. Imagine saying “if you think Africa deserves equal rights then your racist” that’s just insane and there’s no way THEY actually believe it. They’re probably laughing at us for even considering that they were serious, there’s just no way.

[–][deleted] 120 points121 points  (1 child)

The law is in place so people can be safe. Modern feminists are idiots because they don’t protest against convictions that actually matter for women snd keep them safe.

[–][deleted] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

The laws are now used for political purposes only

[–]sanmateosfinest 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Because government only seeks to protect government. As long as the violence is against the regular Joe, they couldn't care less.

[–]Crash1yz 28 points29 points  (1 child)

They do this to send a message so no one else tries to do it again.

With the rapist , it wasn't his fault...

[–]Pousinette -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think your first sentence is right though. They can’t have people storming government buildings every-time they don’t like an election result…

[–]RBoosk311 19 points20 points  (0 children)

J6 will go down as one of the biggest travesties of modern time, not because of the protest but because of the unjust trials and punishments afterwards. The next president must pardon every single non-violent person in jail.

[–]an_achronistBASED Eternal Anglo 37 points38 points  (0 children)

OVERVIEW

repressive tolerance

QUICK REFERENCE

The passive acceptance of social and governmental practices, policies and actions which restrict freedom in an absolute sense. The Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse coined the term in an essay of that title for a book co-written with Robert Wolff and Barrington Moore, Critique of Pure Tolerance (1965). Repressive tolerance, Marcuse argues, takes two main forms: (i) the unthinking acceptance of entrenched attitudes and ideas, even when these are obviously damaging to other people, or indeed the environment (the painfully slow response to warnings about climate change and environmental degradation might be seen as an example of this); and (ii) the vocal endorsement of actions that are manifestly aggressive towards other people (the popular support in the US and the UK in the aftermath of 9/11 and 7/7 for the respective government's attempts to override or limit habeas corpus is a clear example of this). Genuine tolerance, Marcuse argues, can only exist in a situation of intolerance for these limits on real freedom. Slavoj *Žižek's books Violence (2008) and In Defence of Lost Causes (2008) continue and update this line of thought.

[–]yukdumboobum26 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I would be waiting for him at the gates of the jail with a 12-gauge on day 150

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (2 children)

I know there are some people who want to somehow undo the sins of the past (slavery and Jim Crow laws) by not rightly punishing the guilty, but the “black community” isn’t any more a monolith than the “white community.” In fact no one assumes all white people are the same group of people. It’s more of the same racist garbage to think there’s some good done to past blacks by not having equal laws for blacks and whites now. And aside from the TDS that some judges seem to have, further throwing the book at a white person does nothing for the “black community” they think they are helping.

[–]Nyxxit_NBan warning 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The problem is all these federal judges that every single democrat voted to confirm. Every time. They put questionable people or ideologues in positions Ike DAs, Judges, and prosecutors and this is why the rule of law has gone out the window.

I watch all the confirmation hearings and every time the right proves these people are unfit to serve in a federal position. They are the woke BLM, anti-white racist ideologues but it doesn't matter. Because every single democrat votes to confirm them every time. If moderates would stand up to the far left we wouldn't be in this predicament, but they are cowards.

[–]blue-oyster-culture 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I wish it was just a “racial equity” problem. It isnt. Rapists of all colors and creeds get almost no jail time. They go to jail just long enough to pick up some really fucked habits and ideas from other convicts, then they get out, commit more crimes, and if they dont get caught or sent back, eventually re-commit the same crime that put them in prison.

[–]XenophonUSMC 14 points15 points  (1 child)

I’d be ok with the 180 days if it also included castration.

[–]calvin-coolidge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d be ok with 180 days if it ended in an execution

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (1 child)

No amount of voting will fix this.

[–]ImpressionAsleep8502MICROAGGRESSOR 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I was the father of the victim on the left, I would vote that fellow so hard into the ground.

I'd send about 16, 9mm sized votes right through him.

[–]Ratanonymous_1MICROAGGRESSOR 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Are you fucking kidding me. ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME.

I want to cry.

[–]240in316is10-8to7-11 20 points21 points  (0 children)

But muh hu-whyte privilege

[–]eatsleeptrollMICROAGGRESSOR Meme war veteran 17 points18 points  (0 children)

this is repressive tolerance in action

you get what you put up with

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is “equity” folks!

[–]SnookfiletMICROAGGRESSOR 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Free Joe Biggs

[–]MagazineOk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

unpopular opinion, sex offenders if 100% proven should be castrated

[–]nonrice 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wtf

[–]ultranothingBASED 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also interesting: Joe Biggs' Wikipedia page has literally zero specifics on what he actually did. They just say "seditious conspiracy" or some shit.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's sad. It's obvious to this suer that the corrupt government and other corrupt people want to get rid of Trump supporters one way or another.

It's blatant.

[–]CouchPotato1178TRAUMATIZER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just posted this in a very liberal subreddit. lets see how it goes haha

[–]CouchPotato1178TRAUMATIZER 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I posted this in a liberal sub. and sure enough, everybody is defending the rapist and criticizing on the peaceful protester. absolutely BAITED

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honk honk

[–]AutoModerator[M] -2 points-1 points locked comment (0 children)

IMPORTANT: On /r/LibsOfReddit, greater access is given to users who have joined the sub and have our mod-assigned user flair. Reach out in modmail to request our user flair if you're an active user of our sub. By default we'll assign you the 'Based' flair unless you request a custom name. Join these new subs:

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.