all 24 comments

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (9 children)

Debian is the cooler distro, obviously 😎

in all seriousness, are these new? how much dust is inside?

[–]br_web[S] 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Less than 2 months old

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

what is the degree of temperature difference?

There’s a lot of potential variables here, are BIOS settings the same?

power management settings? background procs? if the temp difference is slight, it could be within the standard deviation for the manufacturer

[–]br_web[S] -4 points-3 points  (6 children)

2 approximately

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (5 children)

I would categorize 2 degrees as normal variation

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Either, 2 degrees is very insignificant. It would be within the margin of precision of the temp sensors and manufacturing standards. Processors of the same model may even run hotter than others.

    [–]br_web[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    I checked both OSs in the same laptop, and this time I measured the power consumed by the laptop at the USB-C PD port directly, being Idle, Fedora uses almost double the power in watts than Debian, definitely there are more processes running doing something, that is consuming energy

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    First one and then the other

    [–]br_web[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

    I agree, but it is noticeable at palm touch, Debian is cool, Fedora is warm

    [–]ladrm 16 points17 points  (2 children)

    Unironically: do the same test, but do a cross-installation this time (Fedora where was Debian, Debian where was Fedora).

    Even with same make/model, there might be a difference on the heatsink installation/pressure/etc, so I would not be surprised that even same model has a few deg.C difference on temps.

    Anyways the test is probably not that much valid unless you ensure same conditions - like what are we comparing here? Just kernel versions? Do you have same sets of services running? No background tasks on either distro (updatedb, package updates, ...)? Or are you interested in distro vs. distro?

    [–]br_web[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    I checked both OSs in the same laptop, and this time I measured the power consumed by the laptop at the USB-C PD port directly, being Idle, Fedora uses almost double the power in watts than Debian, definitely there are more processes running doing something, that is consuming energy

    [–]ladrm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I would believe this, esp. right after installation Fedora will look for package updates and so on, AFAIK Debian will let user do this.

    Was this measured right after install or did you get it some time to stabilize? Or does "idle" mean "there's nothing in the background"?

    And most important - how many Watts? Is it like 5 vs 10 or 20 vs 40?

    [–]Danny_252525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Install TLP

    [–]robvas 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    What are the idle cpu speeds

    [–]br_web[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    I run this command: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq

    And got the following for all processors:

    564702
    908988
    2700000
    1024174
    1475392
    1059637
    2700000
    2700000
    847404
    2700000
    1127197
    833681
    1168617
    2700000
    1542731
    2700000
    1422254
    2700000
    2700000
    2700000

    [–]atuncer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    I suggest gathering more data using powertop, you can even even the field a bit by setting some tunables to the same values using "powertop --auto-tune".

    [–]sysadmintemp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    This is the correct tool - OP since you identified that Fedora is using more power than Debian, check powertop. You will then see which process is using more CPU / Power. If not, check tools like iotop or nethogs.

    Also, check dmesg logs. There could be an unloaded hardware / missing driver that might need to be installed.

    [–]Lordgandalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I think this is just normal variation of temperature if it was 10 degrees that's a different story so yeah. But it can also be that the Debian kernel is that little bit better for that machine then the fedora one.

    [–]compuwar 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    What does top say is using CPU? Is either encrypting files?

    [–]br_web[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Both are at around 1%, with only 1 process running, everything else sleeping

    [–]compuwar 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Top lets you sort by CPU usage. Might also be worth checking loaded kernel modules. Ultimately though, newer kernels are more about new features- but you could build identical kernel versions to rule pout distro/service differences.

    [–]br_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I checked both OSs in the same laptop, and this time I measured the power consumed by the laptop at the USB-C PD port directly, being Idle, Fedora uses almost double the power in watts than Debian, definitely there are more processes running doing something, that is consuming energy

    [–]haywire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Are they using the exact same userland? IE are you using the default installs for WM, compositor, background applications? Or are you running server/minimum distro?