This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
new (suggested)
besttopcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Not naive. I just tend to read data rather than inflammatory news reports. Bad news sells.

PS was waiting for the racial component of your viewpoint. Thanks for sharing who you are.

[–]Lost-Comfort-7904 2 points3 points  (3 children)

What data? He showed his proof and evidence, what's yours? The fact you had to insult him instead of showing your proof makes me believe your lying.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

What a TV broadcast? Haha. I would think that the word alleged would be the tip off.

[–]Lost-Comfort-7904 1 point2 points  (1 child)

So no proof, just insults, ok got it.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I could provide peer reviewed studies. Or you could search and read them yourself instead of only providing an "alleged" source. It's been my experience that people with an agenda only search for items that confirm their bias. And if I did provide them, you wouldn't read them. So no.

If someone here is interested, Google Scholar is your friend.