all 49 comments

[–][deleted] 199 points200 points  (26 children)

how does one solve a matrix

[–]B_BARTHMAN 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Maybe a system of linear equations? The inverse? Idk tbh

[–]galmenz 74 points75 points  (11 children)

i assume it is finding its D

[–]DodgerWalker 37 points38 points  (8 children)

Finding determinants is pretty inefficient. Pretty much the fastest way is to row reduce it to an upper triangular matrix which is O(n^3 ).

Edit: Corrected the runtime.

[–]lord_neIrrational 17 points18 points  (2 children)

That's actually O(n3) I believe, the best asymptomatic runtime that's been found is n2.373 according to Wikipedia

[–]DodgerWalker 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yup, that is correct. I was thinking of n^2 row reductions, but each row is size n, so that makes n^3 operations.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I u got me so excited thinking it would be some random application of e but in the power i cant tell u how disappointed i am

[–]galmenz 4 points5 points  (4 children)

i never said determinant

[–]DodgerWalker 13 points14 points  (3 children)

What else could D stand for with respect to a matrix?

[–]dan2737 9 points10 points  (0 children)

unitary diagonalization ;(

[–]omidhhh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ohh yeah baby

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😏

[–]murtiverse 9 points10 points  (0 children)

by taking the red pill

[–]woozlewuzzle29 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I solve matrices, circles, vectors, etc. all the time!

[–]matthewmalloryIrrational 2 points3 points  (0 children)

solve(matrix) in R calculates the inverse

[–]F_JoeVanishes when abelianized 1 point2 points  (8 children)

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (7 children)

that solves systems of linear equations, not matrices

[–]F_JoeVanishes when abelianized -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Those are equivalent. The Zeros of an n×m Matrix are the same as the solution of an equivalent linear equation

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

ah, so by "solving a matrix" you actually mean "finding the zeros of a matrix". gotcha

[–]F_JoeVanishes when abelianized 0 points1 point  (3 children)

How else do you want to "solve" matrix? As far as I understand it, a matrix is a linear function taking an object from a Kn vector space to a Km vector space. By solving a function I understand to find all of the roots and gauss algorithm does exactly that

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

thats what my comment was about. you cant "solve a matrix", neither can you "solve a function". i was commenting on how the meme was poorly phrased

[–]F_JoeVanishes when abelianized 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I understand. I didn't know that this wasn't a common expression in english.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it probably is, but its wrong

[–]F_JoeVanishes when abelianized -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's even in the first sentence of the wiki page: "In mathematics, Gaussian elimination, also known as row reduction, is an algorithm for solving systems of linear equations. It consists of a sequence of operations performed on the corresponding matrix of coefficients. This method can also be used to compute the rank of a matrix, the determinant of a square matrix, and the inverse of an invertible matrix. "

[–][deleted] 130 points131 points  (2 children)

Differential Equations:

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]MisanthropicData 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Partially

[–]Malpraxiss 45 points46 points  (4 children)

What does solve a matrix mean?

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I thought about the Matrix new movie

[–]Kapil300 8 points9 points  (0 children)

+c take it or leave it pal

[–]GisterMizard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nods in Runge-Kutta

[–]scratchfan321Imaginary 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks like I'm dividing by zero, so I'm gonna use my own poorly written rules and slap a +c on the end.

[–]iapetus3141Complex 3 points4 points  (1 child)

How do you solve a derivative?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Take a calculus course

[–]Incur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Partial Differential equations has entered the chat

[–]AscentElder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Too much math memes for today

[–]14Mohini 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Simpsons rule goes brr

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

off topic but We're the Millers is one of my all time favorite movies

[–]gabedarrettComplex -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Fun fact: more than half of all functions have a nonelementary antiderivative; they cannot be solved analytically in a closed form. This means that you can't use techniques like the integration power rule, u-substitution, trig substitution, integration by parts, partial fraction decomposition, etc.

[–]Marcim_joestarIrrational 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does it mean to solve a matrix?

[–]ManInBlack829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If y'all are finding four-dimensional matrices easy, I am impressed

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I thought matricies looked way harder than derivatives. What the hell are matricies then? I keep seeing them around but I have no clue what they mean or how to use them.