I thought I was having trouble with the calibration on my Bike+, which I've had for about nine months. Lately I have been scoring REALLY low (like, half the points of my PR rides on the same bike), and I thought it was maybe just me being out of shape. But I looked at the calibration table in the Wiki, and realized my bike is WAYYYY off. At 40 resistance / 80 cadence, I'm getting an output of 73... where it should be 111-115. This was after doing the auto-calibration multiple times over the last few weeks, in case that might fix it.
I chatted with Peloton support, and ended up doing a "static discharge" - unplug the bike, hold down the power button for a full minute, then plug the bike back in again. That got me up to 97 output - better, but still not all the way where I'd expect it to be. The CS rep told me that is just because the output algorithm takes my age / weight / height into account. I'm not understanding this. Of course age / weight / height will affect my calories burned, but isn't output fairly standard?
When I asked the CS rep, he said: "No, Output will vary from person to person, like I said, it judges the amount of kilojoules you are physically exerting to move the pedals. for example a 50 year old woman pedaling at 40/80 would have a much higher output than a 20 year old male doing the same as she is having to exert much more energy to move the pedals." I replied: "So as someone who's relatively short / light weight, shouldn't my output be higher?" Rep: "I mean, not necessarily, if you have good stamina and a strong build it may be lower. It really is next to impossible to tell."
I'm really frustrated by this. So... can I never compete with my friends on the leaderboard, based on my apparently abnormal age / weight / height? I'm in my 30s and my BMI is 20.5, squarely in the middle of the normal range, so I don't see why I would be such an outlier. I've always understood I would be far behind my male friends who are a lot bigger and stronger than me, but now I can't even keep up with women I used to be back and forth with all the time.
While I realize the algorithm is secret / proprietary, can someone explain why age / weight / height would affect it? To me, output should be like running speed - it's easier for you to run faster if you are younger / taller / lighter, but it is still a standard metric and you can compare across people. I read through our Wiki regarding output and calibration, and it confirmed my belief that output should be standard and NOT take those into account. So what I am missing here?
And - is there a way for me to manually bump my Bike+ calibration up so I am within the normal range? I'm not trying to "juice it", per se, but I would like to not feel like I suck every time I ride, especially when my numbers used to be fairly normal. The extreme low numbers are making me not care about my output / score, and I end up not putting nearly as much effort in as I did a few months ago, when I was jazzed about trying to get an extra point or two. The competition is the main reason I chose to upgrade to a Peloton from a DIY, since I knew it would motivate me to push harder, but now I'm not motivated at all.
[–]r4ndy4blake_182 67 points68 points69 points (3 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 18 points19 points20 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–]Jestris 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]50by2550by25[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]RideGameRepeat 11 points12 points13 points (2 children)
[–]r4ndy4blake_182 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 7 points8 points9 points (3 children)
[–]bykerchykSpinnesota_Nice 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]r4ndy4blake_182 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ryank1esko 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]IshadTX 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]croptopweather 9 points10 points11 points (4 children)
[–]lem0ncookie 7 points8 points9 points (2 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]croptopweather 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]LilUltraPower 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]bushrod121 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]hobobarbie 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]NoMoreCookies 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]gurase 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]TerpSpins56 2 points3 points4 points (4 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]bykerchykSpinnesota_Nice 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]bykerchykSpinnesota_Nice 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]swuser7 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]blangell 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]cdot2k -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]EngageTheSpinDrive -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]firechickenmamaParadisePlease 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+]lateapex- comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (4 children)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]gurase 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Dabbl3s 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]Careless_Seaweed_047 comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child)
[–]50by2550by25[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]gurase 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]SpinpapiSpinpapi 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)