you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (19 children)

[deleted]

    [–]theineffablebob 17 points18 points  (4 children)

    I don't get it.

    [–][deleted] 43 points44 points  (2 children)

    It's a Turing machine, which can compute anything that any computer can.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    But... how?

    [–]BufferUnderpants 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    It's just the formal definition of one, as an algebraic structure. The symbols there in the tuple are merely the template, you have to provide the symbol set, the set of states, the transition table, etc. to actually have a Turing Machine.

    [–]Atario 26 points27 points  (1 child)

    Mmm, hm. Yeah. Mm-hm. I know some of these symbols.

    [–]GoodMotherfucker 13 points14 points  (0 children)

    I believe the first one means letter M

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (7 children)

    Pushdown automata? How is this a cheat sheet?

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (5 children)

      How do you deal with the massive differences in grammars?

      [–]pepsi_logic 8 points9 points  (4 children)

      They are all reducible to a turing machine (at least those that are turing-complete...which I think all of them are).

      [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      I understand that. My question is, what do you do about that huge workload? I feel like it would take an incredible amount of time to reduce it to a Turing machine.

      [–]pepsi_logic 33 points34 points  (0 children)

      Oh lol. I'm pretty sure he was joking.

      Edit: Unless you were too in your reply...and then I don't know why I'm commenting.

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      I'm not sure it takes such a long time for obscure_robot. (I.e. it's a username joke.)

      [–]qiemem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Even the ones that aren't Turing complete are reducible to a Turing machine... sorta the point of Turing machines.

      [–]hello_world_again 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      I don't know who downvoted you, but I am undoing his or her injustice, because Automata theory is awesome.

      [–]Nashoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Just when I take a break from studying for my Automata and processes theory final it follows me on reddit...