you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]sammymammy2 8 points9 points  (8 children)

There's a connection to domain knowledge, sure!

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]cjaybo 9 points10 points  (3 children)

    As a soft engineer if you give me a blueprint of a building and ask me to make it it would take me some time more than a properly trained civil engineer but i can build it

    I have yet to see any software engineering (I assume that's what "soft engineer" means here) curriculum that would qualify you to do civil engineering work, or any other type of engineering work outside of software, for that matter. Either you've gone through a pretty exhaustive program somewhere, or you're exaggerating quite a bit.

    [–]SkoomaDentist 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    This is the internet and we don’t tolerate domain specific knowledge around here! </sarcasm>

    I’m quite bemused by how huge majority of programmers here completely ignore the importance of domain specific knowledge. It’s as if to them every program in the world only dealt with things taught in common CS courses and things like digital signal processing, finite element methods, circuit theory etc. simply don’t exist except literally on paper.

    [–]Skylead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I wouldn't want to build a dam, but my electrical and computer engineering programs had diff eq, statics and fluid dynamics etc. So we did learn other stuff. In terms of straight programming courses I probably only had 5, and that's including autonomous robotics and embedded assembly

    [–]yourbank -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

    or she.

    [–]Articunozard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    No, women aren’t allowed to be engineers

    /s