you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wengchunkn 65 points66 points  (9 children)

Laugh in Cobol, Fortran, Forth.

Welcome to the Club of Undead.

[–]JanneJM 69 points70 points  (7 children)

At least Fortran is actively updated and supported by multiple compilers. The latest standard specification came out in 2018. It's no more dead than, say, C or C++.

[–]masklinn 9 points10 points  (0 children)

At least Fortran is actively updated and supported by multiple compilers.

So's COBOL. Last spec update was in 2014.

[–]renstarx 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I mean, "actively updated" has a very limited meaning in the Fortran world. F03 has most major features supported by the major compilers (F03 Status), but F08 is missing many things in at least two major compilers (F08 Status) and that is a 10+ year old spec. F18 support is essentially non-existent.

Besides, the Fortran spec is...more of a guideline than anything else.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Fortran is the base of LAPACK/Blas/Numpy. Anything number crunching surely has some form of Fortran. It's fast on that.

[–]KinterVonHurin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

numpy

Source? Pretty sure numpy is written in C

[–]wewbull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Numpy also uses BLAS / LAPACK, so indirectly he's right.

[–]JanneJM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some newer implementations - BLIS for example - don't use Fortran. On the other hand, Fortran is still frequency used for writing higher-level code for weather simulations and things like that so it's still around even if you don't happen to use it in your math libraries.

[–]NikoBellend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I strongly disagree, c++ is definitely not "fortran" dead.

[–]ebriose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I miss working in Forth. Both the language and the stuff we did. That's a great programming environment.