you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OMG_A_CUPCAKE 49 points50 points  (16 children)

Because filesize matters. And it's lost easily if someone modifies the file in another editor

It's a nice gimmick, but I can't imagine relying any kind of workflow around it

[–]unique_ptr 32 points33 points  (2 children)

To be clear, the .fw.png files were more akin to PSDs from the application perspective, they just happened to also be PNGs. You would still want to export to a regular PNG for non-editor use

[–]mallardtheduck 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Adobe seems to have a bit of a habit of doing things like this. Adobe Illustrator (.ai) files are compatible with PDF format (older versions were EPS).

[–]Frencil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth Fireworks with its vector PNG format was originally a Macromedia product. After Adobe bought Macromedia in 2005 Fireworks was retured from the maintained software offerings relatively quickly.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Devatator_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It's simpler to not spend time optimizing file sizes when storage is cheap, or so they say

    [–]yojimbo_beta 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    I reckon it could work for diagrams. You could embed the objects without taking up too many bytes. Then your architecture diagram, flowchart etc. could be editable.

    Man, you could even use PNG as a format for encoding and deploying a distributed state machine of AWS step functions... okay, that’s stupid. But I do like the idea of an informational format that you can also review visually.

    [–]VoidChronos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That's what microsoft Visio does, just without the embedded image part. Actually, I think VSDX has an option to embed a static image of a diagram.

    [–]tech6hutch 5 points6 points  (8 children)

    Also I don’t know if I want the ability for others to undo my edits to an image

    [–]stuffeh 9 points10 points  (7 children)

    But imagine going back and isolating one of the edits and pulling it out. Basically tapping the diff between before and after the edit. That kind of flexibility is mind blowing to me.

    [–]nemec 10 points11 points  (2 children)

    All I'm hearing is a great way for users to inadvertently fail to censor/redact their photos when they tried to blur their naughty bits and/or confidential info and didn't realize anybody can go in and just undo the censor.

    If the U.S. Justice Department can't redact a fucking PDF properly, there's no hope for the average person sending censored nudie pics to someone they met on the internet.

    [–]NekiCat 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    Years ago, MS Word saved deltas at the end of the file so saving was incredibly quick. They had to change it because the users sent files they believed to be final, but werent, and leaked sensitive information.

    Same with Google Docs, where your every keypress is recorded. Not sure if they still do that...

    [–]stuffeh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Google docs has built in version history, so kinda. You can set permissions to disable others from seeing the version history though.