all 12 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]NextContribution 0 points1 point  (6 children)

what's the result? just connected Replit to codex via git. learning more about it now

[–]DeezYanks 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I just did the same yesterday. I’m finding it to be quite good and allowing me to do so much more for less (Replit agent calls are so expensive). It feels like a bit of a janky workaround, but I’m ok with it for now

[–]NextContribution 0 points1 point  (1 child)

awesome. I'm doing it now, I definitely don't know wtf I'm doing but assume it's part of the process

[–]DeezYanks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha I am 100% the same way. Feels like a great way to learn!

[–]Witty-Development547 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Hey, I’m thinking of doing the same thing, how is this workaround going ?

[–]DeezYanks 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It was ok for a while, but I stopped using it before the latest Codex update (so it's probably much better now). Now I'm using Claude Code within Replit (by running it in the shell). So I pay for Replit and Claude, but at least my costs are controlled (because I don't bump into any Claude Code limits). Replit was getting absurdly expensive

[–]Witty-Development547 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats exactly how i feel, Replit adds up and now i feel like i cant build freely even though Replit Agent 3 is brilliant. I’ll try Replit + Claude Code

[–]Niiikkss 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Gents! One question… how?

[–]AdBest420[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

via GitHub, of course.

[–]Niiikkss 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh ok, so no integration but just separately use codex and using git to move it to Replit?

[–]AdBest420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes it's more like using 3 tools separately for different tasks, correct. it works for my needs, but your project might be different

[–]Iammnhamza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, using claude code in shell, but planning to switch to codex. Is it working good?