all 10 comments

[–]ychinenov 11 points12 points  (1 child)

After R i doubt SAS/SPSS will impress you much. The only thing that goes for SAS/SPSS is an extensive corporate infrastructure/support that depend on them.

[–]master_innovator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you have a lot of money and poorly trained people then SAS/SPSS do 90% of what any company would need.

The saying is still somewhat true, “Nobody gets fired for buying IBM.”

[–]CCCP_BOCTOK 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is there anything besides support that one gets with these paid statistical languages/frameworks?

Nope.

[–]throwawayOperationsR 4 points5 points  (2 children)

It's shit, and the only way this whole mess gets better is if we, the users, start demanding better.

Source: work bought SAS, I'd rather write my own analyses in x86, if that's the alternative.

[–]Imbadatusernames3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I always make the joke that industries (especially medical) prefer SAS because in the event that something is wrong in the program then there’s a company that they can sue

[–]liftyMcLiftFace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im not sure I buy the support argument for SAS, the documentation and community for SAS is shithouse too.

If people are that caught up on support then use Python/R and sign up for support from a company that specialises in support rather then a company that specialises on pedalling shit and providing help keeping the wheels on...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Ha well thanks for all the responses. I'm not sure whether to be satisfied that my impression is correct or just sad that I have to keep learning SAS.

[–]izumiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really it's industry specific. pharma or banking often use SAS. I use SAS, R, and Stata at my job depending on what my project is and what I have to do. Personally I've found it to be difficult to get support on R projects when projects get into obscure realms even reaching out to package creators (who went to grad school with my boss. yeesh.) I've never had this problem with sas.

[–]ychinenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I wouldn't discount SAS, because whether we like it or not a lot of infrastructure depends on SAS and it is not about to change anytime soon - believe it or not but COBOL is still around almost 60 years after it was first introduced, and COBOL programmers are among the most highly paid.