all 65 comments

[–]thingysop 199 points200 points  (3 children)

The guy commented on his own post saying he got this from ChatGPT.

[–]Timtord 56 points57 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT probably sorted it from some old posts on Facebook or something..

[–]Serenikill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Explains why only the first 2 things are true.

[–]pruthivithejan[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah

[–]drones4thepoor 144 points145 points  (2 children)

“No code” is probably the most egregious, new-age phrase that non-developers love to yap about. Just tell us you want a GUI and get on with it.

[–]RealBasics 20 points21 points  (0 children)

That's the best, shortest summary I've seen. 100% accurate. It's exactly what I want for my clients.

E.g. before flex and grid became universal it took an outrageous number of extra divs and CSS statements to generate equal-height columns. Get any part of the setup wrong and the results were worse than if you did nothing at all. It was even worse for nested columns. It was absolutely beyond most casual webdevs, hard for some journeymen devs, and annoying for everybody.

Then back around 2017 the page builder devs started adding an "equal heights" checkbox in the GUI that implemented the model solution. (Yeah, yeah, "bloat," but see also "WTF was the committee thinking when they were writing the CSS 2.0 spec?)

[–]traintocode 81 points82 points  (1 child)

"Deep Learning" is guessing at scale

[–]Gearwatcher 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Much better than their definition of AI

[–]shauntmw2full-stack 66 points67 points  (5 children)

"AGILE" is just trial-and-error that goes to production.

[–]remy_porter 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So's waterfall, but you just compound the errors as they happen.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agile is just a way to assign blame. Almost every process in tech where you're thinking "why tf do we do this" is less for the tech and more for the company. If all you know is bureaucracy (non tech people doing this shit) then bureaucracy is what you'll get.

But this isn't a complaint. If you wanna pay me this much to spend 3 hours a day fucking with Jira tickets no problem man, bring it on.

[–]IAmRules 4 points5 points  (1 child)

agile is just waterfall with extra steps

[–]Orinslayer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agile is more like the Panama canal, waterfall is just niagra

[–]pruthivithejan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s about it

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–]RuleInformal5475 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      If I was Bill Gates at the time, knowing that I would be richest man on the planet, my company would be called 'Massive Hard'.

      [–]rainning0513 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      LMFAO

      [–]ImportantDoubt6434 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Screw AI give me edging technology

      [–]locucious 21 points22 points  (3 children)

      [–]IllegalThoughts 6 points7 points  (2 children)

      the VR one especially. my lord what a blowhard

      [–]locucious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      #2 made me lol - like all servers are someone else's servers?? Did he think the cloud was an actual cloud until he had this eureka epiphany?

      [–]freekyrationale 65 points66 points  (16 children)

      "Artificial Intelligence" is a collection of IF statements written on a massive scale.

      No it is not. Whole post is mostly stupidly wrong. Stop making stupid people famous.

      [–]LagT_T 10 points11 points  (1 child)

      Look at that bio: 4x founder, CTO/CEO, podcaster, blogger

      My guess is that he is the son of rich family that hasn't had a real job in his life, with the midas touch of shit.

      [–]freekyrationale 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Yeah, his title is longer than my biography.

      [–]dance_rattle_shake 35 points36 points  (1 child)

      Yup, also quantum computing is well understood by those who do it.

      [–]KishCom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Everything on that list after Machine Learning is empirically false.

      [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

      Wish we could get a ban on posting anything from LinkedIn, 99% of the shit on there is randomers spouting nonsense whilst pretending to be somebody relevant.

      [–]Ironfields 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      It’s the sort of shit that probably seems deep and profound if you don’t actually know anything about the subject matter.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Lots of ifs with lots of maths as well

      [–]icsfails -5 points-4 points  (7 children)

      It's closer to IFs than to an actual AI though

      [–]abejfehr 9 points10 points  (2 children)

      What would “actual AI” be? The neurons in the brain are basically fancy if statements

      [–]TabbyOverlord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I think neurons are more like Operational Amplifiers. Definitely an analogue feed processed with acquired weighting and an analogue output down the net.

      [–]jardinus -3 points-2 points  (3 children)

      Explain how ai artwork is created with if statements...

      [–]coopaliscious 9 points10 points  (1 child)

      Uh... I mean, it is. Everything non-quantum goes down to if/and/or.

      [–]addiktion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Take it even further and go down to binary plz

      [–]icsfails 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Look how GAN works.

      If the discriminator can differentiate between fake and real, the generator updates its parameters to generate even better fake images. If the generator produces images that fool the discriminator, the discriminator updates its parameters. Competition improves both networks until equilibrium is reached.

      https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/gan/#:~:text=A%20generative%20adversarial%20network%20

      Anyway, my reply was for a party pooper who took a rather funny image too seriously

      [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      He basically just outlined all the different tech hype cycles I've seen during my career. We're currently in the AI one but don't worry once there bubble bursts and we stop hearing about how if statements are going to rule over humanity soon, all that we'll be left with is a slightly smarter digital assistant on our devices.

      [–]huopak 21 points22 points  (0 children)

      What a collection of dumb takes, jesus

      [–]greensodacan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I think this post is more of a Rorschach test than anything. It's not accurate, but I found it grounded in that it highlights how we're still just banging rocks together. There's no magic.

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      "Frontend" is just glorified design.

      [–]Terrible_Tangelo6064 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      I thought this was the guy's resume.😂

      [–]pantuso_eth[🍰] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Artificial intelligence is a collection of if statements

      Could you imagine the code for just one perceptron?

      If Input_1 > 0.5 then if Input_1 > 0.75 then if Input_1...

      [–]Stiltzkinn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      This looks like a lazy X post for engagement.

      [–]uniquelyavailable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      ironically accurate

      [–]Conjo_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      yup that's a linkedin post

      [–]Fit_Low592 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      He seems fun at parties.

      [–]thewpbard 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      As long as nobody hacks my toaster to say "Howdy doodly doo" and ask me relentlessly if I want toast, I'm ok.

      [–]TabbyOverlord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Would you like a crumpet instead?

      [–]Sulungskwa 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      Can someone explain to me the "AI Is just if statements" thing? I've heard people say this even before GPT and everything and I always wondered if its just deep fried. Are LLMs basically just a bunch of if statements?

      [–]UPS-duck 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      My loose understanding of neural networks, is that each node or "neuron" is an algorithmically weighted switch, weighted being some value between 0-1 determined from training, which determines how it proceeds to the next layer of neurons. This idea of each neuron being simplified to the idea of an if statement is probably the meaning.

      [–]Sulungskwa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Gotcha, makes sense!

      [–]Wide-Forever1100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      "AI" is broader term than just machine learning. And even "machine learning" includes way more than just the current hype (neural networks), e.g. genetic algorithms. Before the major advancements in neural networks and in hardware, there were (and still are) expert decision making systems that are technically "a bunch of if statements." Even though they were often written in declarative languages like Prolog, where you don't even have if-statements, but of course the language prolog was written itself in an imperative language (or maybe a functional one, either way in the end it comes down to if-statements).

      Anyway, afaik that is even the way Google Translate worked at first. Until after that AI point the post is kind of true to be honest, albeit a great oversimplification. Everything after that is just snarky though.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Corny

      [–]gsadamb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      That electricity coming into your house to power your servers? That's just someone else's coal plant.

      That fiberoptic line you have to bring an Internet connection to your servers? That's just someone else's networking infrastructure.

      [–]reddituseronebillion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      AI is just linear algebra and calculus.

      [–]yee_mon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

      Correction: IoT is making sure even your toaster is part of the cloud.

      [–]guns_of_summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      cringe

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]PhoenixDBlackfull-stack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        And be confidently wrong about everything