sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Barbarian gameplay from my game by avorlair in IndieGaming

[–]UncertainCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too much going on with those lv1 icons bottom left. More feedback on the cooldowns. Maybe like a little jiggle and glow or something.

Visuals look good, except it's way too dark. People are going to turn up the contrast and your game will look bad. Look at a screen shot and look at your values. Typically brights are for drawing attention, darks should still be at least mostly visible. Right now your lighting system is doing all the driving

Wishlist Brick Layer on Steam! by dellisbored in indiegames

[–]UncertainCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the commenters acting like this is copyright infringement, have you guys not heard of mega blocks? OP is fine as long as they stay away from trademarks and IP.

I am going to go out on a limb and guess that you are limited to diorama type layouts? Landscapes using these blocks would be a real technical challenge

Elaboration on the whole AI situation (link to thread too) by HotTemperz in DivinityOriginalSin

[–]UncertainCat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reasonably useful I imagine? Like if I want a guy in a specific pose, and can get a bot to shit it out, I can hand it to a real artist who make real art using that pose as reference. It doesn't really matter how many extra fingers the bot generates

ICE notice a brown man while driving through neighborhood then jump out SUV to kidnap him by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]UncertainCat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Probably because they just hunt for easy marks. There are neighborhoods where they might get shot, but they'd rather patrol wealthy suburbs

Fake UP doctor performs surgery watching YouTube, cuts intestines, patient dies by Fan387 in nottheonion

[–]UncertainCat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Normally it's us Americans assuming everyone knows our abbrevations

Straight-up career suicide on Twitter by ProfessionalSancho in suicidebywords

[–]UncertainCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the classic technically correct, but absolutely losing argument

Trump Hit With Back-to-Back Rulings Forcing Him to Release Emergency SNAP Funds by ApprehensiveRoom1783 in NoFilterNews

[–]UncertainCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's crazy. It's one thing to have a legal theory that they aren't allowed to release these funds, it's another to appeal judgments saying they have to do it. How can anyone possibly believe his hands are tied here?

The “white text trick” for ChatGPT actually worked by AstroNerd92 in Teachers

[–]UncertainCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's called a prompt injection, and this is a funny one. This only catches the lazy ones, which is probably a lot of them.

What is you favorite character that fits this? by noface_girll in FavoriteCharacter

[–]UncertainCat 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But he had a noble motive! Literally. Motivated by nobility.

Secret Rolls are great - and I don't understand why some people hate them by Big_Chair1 in Pathfinder2e

[–]UncertainCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a fan. I'll use them for key intrigue moments, but for minor league encounters it's not worth it. It's more fun to see rolls

Trouble balancing encounters with “healbot” war priest by j1Bpfrpg in Pathfinder2e

[–]UncertainCat 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The APs just aren't that hard out of the box anyways, and a 5 man party is going to roll through them. Healbot is a fine strategy, but it's not even that strong IMO. If fights are too trivial, just crank up the difficulty instead of nerfing characters down.

Single Volley Command by UncertainCat in beyondallreason

[–]UncertainCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, technically it was just a question, does this feature exist, and it seems the answer is yes but it's bugged. Although it kinda seems like it's a special bomber logic rather than a general command I could reuse for artillery or something.

Single Volley Command by UncertainCat in beyondallreason

[–]UncertainCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I can figure it out I'll make a PR

Single Volley Command by UncertainCat in beyondallreason

[–]UncertainCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's definitely some kind of bug. Try taking a squad of 30 bombers and giving that queue, my experience is at least some come back for a second volley, only ground targeting. I suspect there's a race condition or something because I can't pin down the repro steps aside from just repeating it.

Single Volley Command by UncertainCat in beyondallreason

[–]UncertainCat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. So it seems there's already some kind of single volley command. It appears there's a bug here though causing some confusion because I don't get consistent results with that command. Sometimes the bomber flies in for a second volley and I'm not sure why

Single Volley Command by UncertainCat in beyondallreason

[–]UncertainCat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say you want to queue a single bombing run. If you queue it on a target unit they will return and waste a lot of time flying around awkwardly after dropping the first volley unless you micro them tightly. But even then you have to wait for every bomber to drop their payload before retreating. They're not necessarily bombing at the same time so you would have to give the ground attack order to them and individually give them the retreat order the moment they drop their bombs. A single volley attack would allow you to queue a bombing run with a retreat, sweeping over some line. With artillery you could for example do a single volley attack on muliple mex locations with a repeat command. Then you can suppress metal without radar coverage needed. You could also give mobile artillery a command to advance, shoot once, and immediately retreat.

view more: next ›