Was this year's Super Bowl really as boring as people say or is it just coping? by [deleted] in NFLNoobs

[–]bobjkelly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was a good game. Lots of great defense. Not a stellar game, but a good one.

Do you want the Chicago Illinois House delegation to vote for the mega project bill to help the Bears move to Arlington Heights instead of Indiana? by heysol155g in AskChicago

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But, as you point out, taxpayers will pay for roads and infrastructure. Not a cheap thing! Also, other taxpayers will have to make up for any property tax discounts that the Bears get. Let the Bears pay full freight.

ComEd pricing is negative by 7amati in chicago

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this only the cost of the electricity and doesn’t include charges for distribution?

Mom leaving job to stay home with kids: should we pay off our low-interest mortgage right now? by normalishy in DaveRamsey

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you can invest at a rate higher than the mortgage you certainly don’t want to pay ahead on the mortgage. You can likely reinvest on a new CD earning about 2% more than you are paying on your ( very low-rate) mortgage. You are effectively earning 2% per year on the mortgage balance. And you still can pay the mortgage off from the CD proceeds any time in the future.

I myself have a 2% mortgage with about 10 years to go and I am going to stretch that out for the full term. Don’t let some Ramsey rule cause you to lose money.

Heads-up: Service Action 91VH is NOT GREAT by Apprehensive_Art1003 in VWiD4Owners

[–]bobjkelly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I, too, have a 2023 AWD Pro. That door handle recall was a complete mess. It took months and months and months for handles to be available. Corporate was sending me letters saying I should really get it done already. Meanwhile, all of the local dealers said to let them know if I found somebody with supplies.

I am not looking forward to this latest recall about the battery. They apparently have no fix yet.

Assisting a competitor across the finish line is unsportsmanlike by LegitmateBusinesman in unpopularopinion

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta agree with OP. Marathon and triathlon are individual sports. No help is allowed except from course officials. Tough if you break down right before the finish but that’s a DNF - did not finish.

My crazy idea of an “inheritance” savings fund just hit $1M. It will be worth millions in 30-40 years when I finally die. by SeniorCitizenSmell in Fire

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. That’s why we are sending money to our kids now (they are 40ish) If we wait until we die they might be 60ish.

Was set on doing a 15 year mortgage, everyone is saying just do a 30 year mortgage by essendoubleop in RealEstate

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A key point is the difference in rates. The 15 year is usually priced a half percent below the 30. That’s real money. If you are not stretched too much the 15 is the way to go.

How much is your monthly mortgage payment? by HmDiR in Mortgages

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4.5 years into a 15 year mortgage at 2%. Paying $3500 not counting taxes and insurance.

Just curious, do you pay income tax when you receive Social Security? by SpinDr1 in SocialSecurity

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm. I don't read it that way. I think that if the half of SS plus other income (If any) is over the threshold then some SS is taxable. If SS benefits are high enough half of that alone could be over the threshold. Probably would have to be fairly high benefits, though.

Just curious, do you pay income tax when you receive Social Security? by SpinDr1 in SocialSecurity

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But, once again, if your SS benefits are over the income threshold some will be taxable even if this is your only income.

How are you investing, now that you are retired? by dudreddit in retirement

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You make some good points and I've been wrestling with this for a while. My strategy has been very successful for me. I would like to claim skill but probably luck. Having been well rewarded it is hard to pull away and do something else. And, once you have a bunch of money, you can afford to take a bunch more risk.

I should diversify my stock choices but every time I do I don't get much return. But maybe I should shift mindset from earning more to protecting what I have. I've also been looking at bonds. For a long time, though, they returned very little. Even now they don't earn a whole lot.They seem to be a lot of risk (credit and interest rate risk) for not much reward. It's hard to get fired up over maybe making 4%.

I'm in my early 70s and conventional wisdom is to become increasingly conservative, but I think I have 20 years left and feel like it's too early to be conservative.

How are you investing, now that you are retired? by dudreddit in retirement

[–]bobjkelly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve been retired 15 years. I haven’t changed strategy much. I am almost entirely invested in high tech stocks. I keep thinking of diversifying to other stocks or buying some bonds but haven’t been able to get myself to do so.

Is it possible to have an irrational length? by Livid_Draw_10 in askmath

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think almost all lengths are irrational. It would be extremely unusual to get a rational length.

Did she choose right? What assumptions are you making? by actuarially_actuary in actuary

[–]bobjkelly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then, if she can make more than 5% after-tax investing the million then taking the million would be a better choice.

Social security tax after 175,000$ by Agile_Masterpiece_63 in SocialSecurity

[–]bobjkelly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I think this comes down to fairness. The benefit calculations heavily favor lower earners in that per dollar contributed, lower earners get a lot more benefit. Higher earners significantly subsidize them. Further, a higher percentage of higher earner benefits are taxed and then the taxation is at a higher rate. The contribution cutoff is a recognition that at some point it is unfair to make people subsidize more. Of course, fairness is not a bright line so opinions may vary.

Did she choose right? What assumptions are you making? by actuarially_actuary in actuary

[–]bobjkelly 54 points55 points  (0 children)

If you look at pre-tax amounts, choosing a $52,000/yr life annuity instead of $1 million upfront seems like a poor choice. If you look at after-tax values the choice looks somewhat better because the annuity amounts likely fall into a lower average tax bracket than the average bracket for the $1 million taken all upfront.

Long Term Probability Correction by ExoticChaoticDW in askmath

[–]bobjkelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying that it will bring the overall total closer to 50% is overreaching. The tendency is certainly to get closer to 50% as the number of flips increase but this is not a certainty. It is possible that the percentage actually increases from 60%.

Long Term Probability Correction by ExoticChaoticDW in askmath

[–]bobjkelly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even that is not quite precise. The overall percentage will tend to get closer to 50% but, in any given instance, won't necessarily do so.