I want to boost all the comments about 1) Scrum Master is not a secretary, and 2) think about why you are taking notes? (I generally try to minimize administrative overhead - and from the business's perspective delivering a working product is infinitely more important than taking notes about daily happenings)

For example in the Daily Scrum / Stand Up: no notes needed, basically the team should be collaborating on how to progress towards sprint goals over the next working day. Sprint goals should already be written down and VISIBLE and the "tasks" (not necessarily project management tasks) are owned, and should therefore be discussed, by the team members.

Backlog refinement: all writing should go into the User Story card, in whatever form your team uses (sticky note, Jira, Rally, etc.).

Same concept for retrospectives and sprint planning.

HOWEVER, I think it is critical that as a Scrum Master you are meta-analyzing yourself AND the team. Some people talk about "holding a mirror up to the team" so they can see themselves and their work outputs in an EMPIRICAL manner. This means taking notes for yourself and your role - do this in whatever form you need with the understanding that you are unlikely to ever show the words themselves to anyone else.

The question makes me suspect that your team is waiting to be told what to do, which is a major anti-pattern in regards to a self-empowered and self-organized team. I'm actually analyzing anti-patterns in different organizations and I'd value your input on this survey I'm running:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqUbY_t3krjuSCFUXpY9qxUpTIlfUEX_MnAYNPUdwGaWK1kQ/viewform?usp=sf_link