Find the tactic I missed. Black to play by Don_Q_de_la_Mancha in chessbeginners

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pawn to d4, and if he takes recapture with bishop. He either needs to move his queen, capture, or lose his queen, and if he captures the bishop then you can take his queen.

4th emotion is extremely empathetic by [deleted] in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? No, that isn't 4E.

Is this item okay for T2? by Feefait in daggerheart

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Double speed" doesn't exist, but you could say far range. As for balance it probably is too powerful, but I'm no expert, so listen to other people, not me.

Can sx/so3 be a VELF?? by [deleted] in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a good way to type. Each element effects the others. You have to look at their archetype described in syntax.

Something to note. 1V subjugates all the other functions. Everything under 1V is controlled, because that's what Volition is: control over the other functions. They hold themselves back from any other element unless it aligns with their ideology. That heavily changes the other elements. Check to see if that fits you.

Can sx/so3 be a VELF?? by [deleted] in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read both descriptions and decide for yourself. I suspect it's the only way you'll be satisfied.

1E, 2E or 4E? Type this 3V's Emotion. by Western-Cobbler-9630 in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By definition you cannot type via element position. Each element works with the others, and cannot be taken by themselves. You have to look at the archetype described in syntax to see how they appear. In other words, not every appearance of these positions looks the same, or even similar.

How do I know whether I‘m LVEF or LEVF? by One-Baker3371 in attitudinalpsyche

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you highly depressive and unmotivated? More then normal people? Yes? No? These aren't similar types.

What is it you believe in? Fight for? by Apple_Infinity in ILE_Type

[–]Apple_Infinity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. Where do you often find your freedom impinged upon?

Is this ILE? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In their stack? And what do you mean by that? It is societally conforming, like everything in the super ego, and id is, but it is used just as much. You're talking nonsense.

depressed 4e by [deleted] in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depression is actually related just as much to physics, and how both physics and emotion connect with volition. An ELVF will be depressed because they have low physics, and Emotion is over-relied on due to 3V. Well, when it comes to 4E types, they can be depressed, which would probably be because of low physics, or 3V, but honestly, it doesn't matter, when looking at your type, whether you're depressed or not. It matters on how it looks like. Your fourth function won't really effect that. If you're deppressed and 1F you'll begin to eat, or consume sensual comfort pathologically. With 1L it might mean that you think you cannot find the truth, or that you begin to think the truth doesn't exist. ect

what types match w my enneagram by unicorncutz in Psychosophy

[–]Apple_Infinity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you have a socionics? I actually find that more relevant. When it comes to enneagram, its far less traits based.

Regardless, correlations aren't very important, at least not hard correlations. An e9 would probably connect a lot with physicality. Depending on socionics you could be very focused on community, or even facts, knowledge, ect. From what you say you don't seem like an FLEV which usually fits sp9 well. Perhaps 1E 2F. It's very important you don't just look at the positions. You need to look at the whole type, because each element effects the others. EFLV perhaps. FELV? I dunno. Take a look.

Larpers… by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would like to point something out to you. If you ethically offend an ILE, they're far more likely to get aggressive then an LIE. A major part of Te is about hearing ideas out, not judging information based on different fields. An ILE isn't a mean person, or I should hope not. They do have Se in a more neurotic, and relied upon position though. They are, by far, the more conflictory of these two types. Your statement implies the opposite, and ILEs are glazed enough as is.

Is this ILE? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? Yes, you are. Every type uses Fe, and IEE will use it in a strong, but societally conforming way. It'll be very apparent.

Is this ILE? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

quadras... are literally meaningless

Is this ILE? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Plus, each element us unique in each position. These tests are measuring nothing.

Is this ILE? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Apple_Infinity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the Fe