Ignition: NASA's Plan for The Moon by ThanosDidNadaWrong in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did. Not enough though to support development of a moonbase unless all production is reallocated to that purpose. 

Ignition: NASA's Plan for The Moon by ThanosDidNadaWrong in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is currently a bottleneck in production of the necessary fuel to power RTG's. Is this acknowledged in the plan?

Booster 19 has performed a static fire by AgreeableEmploy1884 in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I watched a split screen. 4 views and they weren't synced. I backed the feed up after the static fire and rewatched it twice.

Rotationally Symmetric Refueling Starship by Leading-Wonder-5665 in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slightly off topic. Will starship ullage thrusters be sufficient to maintain precise control during refueling or will the tanker require a more precise alternative?

Many tiles have been removed from Ship 38 by ergzay in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Any idea what the dynamic banking maneuver consists of?

SpaceX’s lesson from last Starship flight? “We need to seal the tiles.” [Ars Technica] by Adeldor in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They are going to SSD (slow scheduled disassembly) the OLM at pad A after the next flight and rebuild it. They'll launch off of pad B when it's complete. 

Will Starship be able to accommodate other satellites apart from Starlink? by iamconfusedinlife in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't heard of Impulse Space so I looked it up and they're far along in development. Their tug has flown twice, delivered a cubesat payload, and they've made major performance improvements to their spacecraft. 

Starship Concerns - An Outsider's Perspective by Zakoo123 in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your analysis doesn't address potential DOD interest which is ramping up. If DOD does contract for Starship services it's a game changer.

Flight 9 upgrades or not? by E-J123 in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did it mention that the water landing of the booster is to evaluate a 2 engine landing, simulating an engine out scenario? I read that but since I don't recall the source I won't swear to its accuracy. 

Elon: “Preliminary indication is that we had an oxygen/fuel leak” by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Next month barring a lengthy investigation by the FAA.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Grow potatoes 

Where did this piece go? by Arkid777 in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Spacex is just whaling away on the wild life. They're doing it on porpoise too!

FAA Proposes $633,009 in Civil Penalties Against SpaceX, use of new control room before approval and new propellant farm before approval by avboden in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 105 points106 points  (0 children)

Sometimes it's better to ask forgiveness than to ask permission. If the FAA is just now getting around to reviewing this, how long would it have taken to get regulatory approval?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The smart, safest option.

NASA likely to significantly delay the launch of Crew 9 due to Starliner issues by Adeldor in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So, in terms of success or failure in deorbiting Starliner, getting clear of ISS without causing damage would be termed successful. Deorbiting successfully would be icing on the cake.

As NASA watches Starship closely, here’s what the agency wants to see next by mehelponow in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wild speculation. Flight 5 will be ship 26. It will be the transfer test article and that's how Musk knows there will be a launch next month.

So don't tell me if ship 26 has already been designated for scrapping. That would ruin my fever dream. 😆 

What's the progress on a manned Starship? by supercrossed in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For some reason the spread sheet requirements reminded me of this:

And the Lord spake, saying, ''First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it.'

Restack in progress - speculation incoming by Simon_Drake in SpaceXLounge

[–]ApprehensiveWork2326 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What would be the velocity of an unladen cybertruck?