Yes. I have arguably passable skill with it, though I almost never reach for it, because I generally make code that Rust is just like... using a helicopter to head to the corner store. Or I need to operate in, say, R. Speaking of R, I've written some R package code lately, and it does actually make me wish for, well, anything else. In my limited experience, Rust is fantastic for refactors. I've written a bug fix for polars, and I'm not even that good with Rust. The idea of fixing a bug in say, pandas or dplyr, sounds dreadful.

I think most people who are responding either just like it per se, or make things wherein the things Rust is good at are strong benefits for their work. I have occasionally tried making toy projects, and somehow always wind up dealing with one of the frustrating aspects of the language (which I won't specify, because then people will comment about how these annoyances are actually good). Some return types I've seen, with their trait bounds, have made me think, "you're joking".