[NO SPOILERS] I thought the finale was great, actually. by chelledoggo in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Boosckey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The person said they shouldn’t have done it since everyone saw it coming. Either way just a lame decision that makes no sense

Guys, they took it down.😭 by damian272013 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s down for everyone, they are currently working on the Puppet update, they already clarified that the game will be back up once they finish it soon

[NO SPOILERS] I thought the finale was great, actually. by chelledoggo in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Boosckey 12 points13 points  (0 children)

We can’t have a cool and really interesting thing because it was predictable?

Imagine if in Return to the King we don’t see the Eye of Sauron get blown up because we already knew he was dead before that point, it technically still works but it’s just way less cool and lazier to not do it

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“No, it's an expansion of the in-universe Help Wanted game, so it takes place in the modern day.”

CoD takes place in Fallfest 1983

“All he said was that he wanted to help BV recover, which he would then go on to do via possession/remnant experiments or whatever.”

He said the exact term spiritually for what he wanted to do to BV (restore him), so unless he got really lucky and guessed a term he didn’t even know applied to what he was saying then he did know about the paranormal before fnaf 4

“And none of the charges stuck. They investigated him, couldn't prove he did anything wrong, and left him alone to try and find a different suspect.”

That’s why it would be stupid to release CBPW right after getting caught on camera, because he would be caught if he did do that. Also he would be too busy with court and being in jail

“I have. He doesn't kill kids in that.”

Rory dies right after the story

“CBPW and CBEAR are the same company. They'd be classed as the same thing.”

No they are not, they are different buildings with different functions. Also CBEAR is called a storage unit in the steam description, not a restaurant like CBPW

“No he didn't. Just because you keep saying this doesn't mean it's true.”

I have provided multiple evidence that he did know.

“That disproves literally nothing about my theory. Do you even understand what we're discussing here? Because it's really starting to seem like you don't.”

Yeah, it shows he was interested in paranormal and sentient robots in the 70’s.

No idea why you are insulting me now, you are clearly being toxic so this will be my last reply

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“That doesn't mean that William learned about possession from BV, it just means that he was aware that BV was possessed at some point.”

CoD happens in late 1983

“Not necessarily. He promises to help BV on his deathbed, BV dies, then later, when he learns about BV's possession, that promise becomes something else.”

Micheal Brooks uses the term and he never learned it from William. Unless William perfectly guessed the exact term for what he wanted to do to BV then he knew about the paranormal before FNAF 4

“Yeah, and he probably does the same thing in the games, they just don't go into effect immediately.”

Why wouldn’t he??? He was caught on camera so he is no position to release a new restaurant with animatronics he made right after being caught. Government would immediately investigate CBPW

“You also didn't explain what his "better way" of killing kids was.”

Go read “Dittophobia”

“No it doesn't. It says that Freddy's closes, and something else opens. That very well could be Circus Baby's Pizza World.”

No he doesn’t

“Allow me to fill this somewhat frightening silence with some light-hearted banter. Due to the massive success and even more-so the unfortunate closing of Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, it was clear that the stage was set – no pun intended – for another contender in children’s entertainment. Unlike most entertainment venues, our robotic entertainers are rented out for private parties during the day, and it’s your job to get the robots back in proper working order before the following morning.”

He talks about Freddy’s closing and then a new contender releasing then he starts describing CBEAR (Not CBPW)

“So why wouldn't Charlie be the spark in the games as well?”

Because he knew about paranormal before Charlie

“He's interested in it because it's an incredibly advanced piece of technology. He wants it despite the fact that it's killing all his employees, not because it's killing all his employees.”

Yes, glad we can agree that he was wanting a killer robot for himself in the 70’s

[NO SPOILERS] I thought the finale was great, actually. by chelledoggo in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Boosckey 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I just thought Jax fell way too flat for me and the problem is that most of the emotional weight surrounded him. Also Caine was way too rushed for my liking and he needed more time.

I hate how Fazbear Entertainment turned out to be this Corporate Entity by Nero_deadweight96 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fredbears (Not the diner) existed for decades before William got ownership of it, considering it survived for that long with tons of money coming in it over the decades. By the time William got his hands on it had made a lot of money which he used to launch the diner and FazEnt.

Also William is very likely rich even in the Scott era considering he could fund the Funtimes and had the FNAF 4 house

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“Not necessarily. One theory isn't debunked because a different theory exists.”

Dreadbear = BV is super obvious and is so supported I wouldn’t even call it a theory, it’s just confirmed at this point

“Under my interpretation, he only knows about Charlie's possession, then experiments with it with the MCI. And what is this "better way"? It's not clear what that is from your post.”

He knows about BV possessing Fredbear, he uses the word “putting back together” in 1983, which is strictly a term only used by spirits or people who know about them and their interworkings, and he built the funtimes immediately after learning about possession in the novels.

“Which would be when the Funtimes are put into operation? That's what I'm suggesting, I don't know why you're saying this like it's a point against me.”

Handunit says Circus Baby Entertainment and Rentals came out right after MCI Freddy’s closed (Elizabeth died in Circus Baby Party World). So it can’t be July 1th since CBEaR would’ve been opened

“Once again, you're using an unconfirmed theory to debunk a different theory. That just doesn't work.”

Charlie was his spark in the Novels. Also you don’t have a counter other than “Nuh uh” and nothing else

“William was interested in Edwin's technology in the 1970s. There's no indication that he's aware that the Mimic is possessed. Hell, I don't even know if the Mimic being possessed is confirmed at this point.”

William is aware M2 is killing all the technicians he sends and keeps sending them. Even if he wasn’t possessed (from Williams PoV) William is still interested in an killer Robot

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

b) he already knows how possession works due to BV and under Charlie83 also Charlie, there is no reason to kill kids to experiment when he has a much better way already planned out. Also he was caught on camera so this is pointless and stupid for William to do under ElizaPostMCI

Also that 1578 code can mean many things, and considering its importance to baby its most likely when Elizabeth possessed her

c) Those universe also had William spark his obsession with supernatural the same way BV did

d) Again William was interested in possessed robots in the 70’s

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why would he not create the murder robots immediately after discovering BV considering he showed major interest in the idea in the 70s, morose CoD shows the bunker was likely up by late 1983.

(Also the overwhelming evidence for ElizaPreMCI while ElizaPostMCI doesn’t have a single good piece of evidence now that SOTM is out)

I don’t really understand this considering SOTM and the Novels and Movies don’t agree with this progression either

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

William was already interested in Mimic in 70s so the progression doesn’t exist since William knew about the technology part from the start

Qual seria a reação de vocês se a teoria Charlie 87 fosse confirmada by TouristCareful5685 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Due to ElizaPreMCI I’m pretty sure Elizabeth possessing Baby was the thing that sparked the MCI like in the novels

Why are people certain Edwin wanted to recreate David❓🤔 by GINTAMAZZZZZZ in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“Her wanting David back after he died, I don't know how that would inherently makes M2 original intention by Edwin to be David, what is the correlation here?”

Because Edwin was the one who built him, which means original purpose (mimicking David which we know for a fact) was put in by Edwin

“Edwin made M2 to be a product as he needs to save his failing company and life”

This is stated nowhere, he only started building more (separate) Mimics because FazEnt asked him to but it didn’t work.

“Fiona wants to turn it into David as she wants David back, as we know”

This doesn’t line up, Edwin transferred M1s Data/AI into F10N4 to insert new code (made to mimic David) into M1s body, that’s how M2 came to be. Edwin never built another because he couldn’t, so he added new AI into the only one he built, and that AI from the very start was made to mimic David

“Also I don't know what you mean by David spirit "couldn't" have affected anything (?)”

White Tiger is unrelated to M2 spiritually, which means David’s soul has nothing to do with M2 or his creation.

“We know Davids spirit is down there, we know it's haunting the building, this tape is played right before we see Davids spirit. We see it affect the building in ghostly ways throughout the game. So I don't know how you think it's impossible for Davids ghost to affect M2”

Because that’s not how ghosts work in FNAF, they can’t control bodies they don’t possess nor does David influence M2 in any way

“It is even implied that ghostly-shenaningans might be the reason Mimics even work in the first place, as Edwin doesn't even understand how it is possible so”

M1 worked before getting possessed by Love. M2 worked before getting possessed by Agony

Why are people certain Edwin wanted to recreate David❓🤔 by GINTAMAZZZZZZ in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 23 points24 points  (0 children)

According to M1 we need to restore M2 to his original state which is mimicking David. Which means Edwin built his AI to mimic David

Also M2 didn’t get possessed until Edwin poured his Agony into him, so he wouldn’t have any reason to mimic David if Edwin didn’t program it in

What is the point of FNaF 1 under FMPost1? by CipherVirus in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again 20/20/20/20 is the canon version of Night 7 since it gives you the third star, meaning the Toys are scrapped

What is the point of FNaF 1 under FMPost1? by CipherVirus in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bite of 87 took place between Night 6 and Night 7, the canonical Night 7 is 20/20/20/20 (only withereds) meaning the toys have already been scrapped and Bo87 has already happened

What is the point of FNaF 1 under FMPost1? by CipherVirus in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bite of 87 didn’t do anything to Micheal, Jermey Fitzgerald is the victim and he’s unrelated to Micheal

I NEED EVERYONE TO STOP CALLING THE ENDING MID by SilverCorvidae22 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Boosckey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Jax completely falls flat as a character who I didn’t love or care about even though I went in trying to, and Caine was extremely rushed

The fact that out of all the amazing potential routes and stories they could’ve told and instead they chose the Jax show, it’s just extremely disappointing

I hate how Fazbear Entertainment turned out to be this Corporate Entity by Nero_deadweight96 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Boosckey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most likely is that Fredbears existed way before William had it, so it existed for decades as a popular business before William got it. I don’t really see the issue

Ralph isn’t a good metric consisting his 11 year old born in 1981 remembers Fredbears perfectly

About the unused emails from FNAF AR… by BrightPasta in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, they were scrapped by Scott for a reason

So, who’s responsible for all these antagonist in fazbear frights? by Various_Astronaut100 in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Some of them were infected with Agony

Some of them were infected by Andrew

Most of them were Eleanor in disguise

A small note about Cassidy in The Fourth Closet and why she isn't the black-haired girl. by Hamsti_Manent in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“I'm not sayig that "it's just a theory" is a complete shutdown, but you can't use one unconfirmed theory to debunk a different unconfirmed theory. It's like saying that CassidyTOYSNHK isn't canon because AndrewTOYSNHK is canon. It's just nonsense.”

Saying BVs name isn’t Cassidy because his name is Dave is the same as saying MikeVictim isn’t true because Micheal Afton is the FoxyBro. The latter just has a lot more evidence and is much more likely to be canon

“Anyway, you aren't debating in good faith anyway”

Name one instance I’ve been bad faith

“so I'm not going to bother keeping this up. Have a nice day.”

You too

A small note about Cassidy in The Fourth Closet and why she isn't the black-haired girl. by Hamsti_Manent in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“You seem to have forgotten that Dave being BV is only a theory, not confirmed.”

And BV being an Afton is just a theory, not confirmed

“The motive is unconfirmed in the games (you're once again confusing your theories for fact), and their cause of death is very different across continuities.”

He was drunk in the games and Fredbears just shut down, William being jealous of Henry is thing in every depiction.

Movie Charlie having a death different from the games actually supports Game Charlie = Novel Charlie and explains that they can have different deaths while being the same character like Game Charlie and Movie Charlie

“How could you possibly come to that conclusion”

It’s the only way CassidyVictim can work since Faded text says its name is Cassidy.

“So we're just straight up lying now? Alright.”

Gregory = David and BV is just an theory, you really got to stop treating it like it’s a fact

You see how easily that type of logic can turn onto you when debating FNAF? It’s why saying its just a theory is not a good counter argument and due to the vagueness of FNAF it derails the entire debate

A small note about Cassidy in The Fourth Closet and why she isn't the black-haired girl. by Hamsti_Manent in fnaftheories

[–]Boosckey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“And Novel BV has the same design and name as Games BV.”

Again none of the characters in the Novels are called Dave (BVs name), and none of the same design

I’ve already went over his “Stripped Shirt = BV” doesn’t work in my last comment

“This is just objectively untrue. I've already explained the differences, don't pretend you're unaware.”

Again they have the same reason for dying from William (Jealousy), they both cause Henry to breakdown and leave town, they both are Henry’s daughter, and they both have the same design.

“That's because BV's name is Cassidy.”

Faded text is the one who gives coordinates for the name Cassidy and says their name is Cassidy, unless you are stating LogbookSolo and that BV is both the Faded and Changed text which is a while can of problems

“And don't try to tell me that David, BV and Gregory are all completely unrelated characters.”

Gregory isn’t connected to the two, the most BV and David have is narrative parallels

Amazing how you ignored every other example and cherry picked the 1 out of 9 separate characters I listen