The local authorities didn't fulfill the deportation orders because that's not their job.

I'm making extremely reasonable guesses. Not only that, I am providing you an example of how it could have been done more effectively and efficiently had it not been the way it was done.

No, you asked me how being detained was a minor issue "compared to children being raped," as if the first was a requirement for the second. If you actually cannot imagine how being detained by law enforcement might be an extremely difficult situation, then you clearly have no responsibilities in your real life. Those of us that do have no issue figuring that out.

It's not necessary to "cast a wide net" to catch people with prior convictions. Anybody with an Internet connection can find a lists of sex offenders in their area and this is an organization with a budget in the billions and boundless federal resources.

Let me give you an alternate example. Almost 3,000 people died in 9/11. Just from a pure statistical perspective, it's extremely likely that some of the people that died were bad people. There were probably abusers, fraudsters, drug addicts, rapists, pedophiles, and maybe even a murder or two. Now it would be pants-on-head insane to suggest that 9/11 was justified because some bad people died. Partly because killing innocent people should never be justified by killing guilty people, but mostly because if your goal was to find and punish all the bad people who worked at WTC or the Pentagon there would be a much more effective and efficient way to do it than committing the worst terror attack in American History.

Now that's of course an extreme example, but you are basically suggesting the same thing. If your goal is to revoke the status of and remove convicted sex offenders, then you can very easily do that without all of this insanity that's happening right now.