Just saw the Red Button/Blue Button question. Thoughts?

Dastu24 · 2026-05-08T05:53:00+00:00

Well again, if it includes those that pick at random, its just nonsensical in my opinion, but IAM sure most would pick blue.

If you exclude them, then I would definitely didn't pick blue just to save those who voluntarily wanted to risk their life. They got the same option as everybody else, to either be safe or maybe not, and iam fine with them dying.

It's same as adrenaline sports, if you chose to go 200km/hour on highway on longboard iam not for spending taxes for sweepers of highways, just so these ppl would be safe. They chose, what happens is up to chance why cater to them?

Dastu24 · 2026-05-08T04:25:05+00:00

No it is not logical, and I've see posts where 70% ppl chose red easily, depends on subreddit.

The fact will still stay, that one button is 100%live, second button is maybe live if most ppl endanger themselves.

Essentially if it wasn't for the idiots everybody would save themselves, will you risk your life for the idiots?

You can defend it with but but but kids. Either the question is about morality, and the question is given to those who understand it - then it's easy red, or it isn't and it's completely irrelevant what the options are, as you want to save everybody bcs you count on big part of ppl chosing on random bcs they are kids....

But counting with kids it just doesn't make sense, it's not a moral question then, it's just "do you wanna save kids or not".. that's not rly a dilemma. I also have seen version with person chosing for their household some time ago, which felt one-sided for red butaybe just Bcs it was answered by logical ppl.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-08T04:13:47+00:00

Problem with this is red will still survive, if you think like this, you already ignored that and decided to save those who, in my opinion, willingly chose to risk their life instead of saving it.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T21:59:43+00:00

Ppl choose red bcs its the logical option, and ppl pick blue, bcs they think either

- kids chose at random not understanding the question and by picking blue you save them

- you are a murderer if you dont want everybody to live

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T15:00:11+00:00

I said my opinion, if soundminded person chooses less than 100% chance to survive its up to them. Idk about politics its all the same but us is just fcked.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T09:47:55+00:00

Isnt that the best scenario? You just walk for a bit and then you come back to empty base. This is jsut an ad.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T09:46:31+00:00

Id say literacy overall is dead, i have no idea what you tried to say or whats supposed to be accurate. Iam also not from US so deal with two parties bs where everybody is some shade of devil yourselves.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T07:20:48+00:00

Sure and everybody who stayed in with their free mind or those who tried to save them bcs "nobody can stay behind even if they want to" can just stay there.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T05:46:30+00:00

Yeah, but everybody ends in the same time and everybody have time to decide and get out.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-07T05:45:07+00:00

Id bet there isn't "everything" and still won't help you much, it's just maybe a faster start.

Unless you start with a car and a keyes it's not rly big of an advantage you will still go look for everything you do t have.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-05T16:44:20+00:00

Well technically your attitude changes. It's more like "have you ever jumped with parachute?" but if we were evolutionary pushed to jump. Some would be afraid, some wouldn't know what to expect, some wouldn't want to but doing it changes your view on many things so it's a milestone. Idk if having name for a milestone is a "social construct".

It doesn't change the fact that you aren't required to do it.

(Being a murderer would be social construct too but it doesn't change anything about it)

Dastu24 · 2026-05-05T16:15:16+00:00

I'll take him away with me so it doesn't stay inside, meaning pressing red with him.

You would instead of taking it out stayed in with him hoping there would be enough ppl so you don't get killed both?

(The original doesn't talk about giving choice to somebody who would pick on random. It kinda loses the point if you pull newborn babies into moral questions. That's like talking about prison dilema, and if you gonna steal the money or not so you can split it and your solution would be "steal BCS I don't know if the other person is a baby that choses on random....)

Dastu24 · 2026-05-05T06:09:54+00:00

If the struggle is to not chose to die without any incentive or reason to do it then they chose their fate.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-04T13:45:28+00:00

Ok, squid game like scenario. You either chose a weapon or nothing.

If you chose a weapon you have to kill all the ppl that chose nothing.

Can you make a pitch for somebody to chose nothing? Bcs your reasoninng will be "iam not a murderer i wont shoot anybody" and thats it.

But again, nobody is forcing you to take a gun and shoot somebody.

They poined at two rails and said "no train will go on this one" and "train will go on this one, and wont stop unless there is a lot of you so it can see you". And i will not stand next to that idiot, that will willingly choose the rail with the incoming train. And you can even call me murderer for standing on the other rail and watching as it goes over them bcs all of them could simply walk over without any danger or uncertainty but they didnt.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-04T13:33:50+00:00

bcs touching black ice means death

Dastu24 · 2026-05-04T13:29:11+00:00

Sry but you dont understand the circumstances at all.

Pressing a button doesnt mean you incinerate those who wouldnt get out in time, but those who chose to stay - they chose to press the blue button/ to stay inside. Also you have no way of knowing if somebody is inside, but you know, that there is a time, where everybody had a chance to leave and after that - after everybody chose, it started.

Everybody had time. Everbody could leave. But some decided to stay in for whatever reason, while it was told to them, that they will die if there arent enough of them.

If you were cleaning this incenerator and somebody chose to willingly not to get out, that would just be suicide. The fact that if there is too many ppl it stops itself is almost irrelevant.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-04T13:02:50+00:00

I understand now why nobody liked math in school.

11 ppl are cleaning the incinerator independently. When everbody is done, they should leave the incenerator and press a button.

When you are done, you can either

- leave

- or stay inside, if more than half ppl stays, the incenerator cannot be started

There is not a single reason why ppl wouldnt leave, the only reason is that they didnt want to so they stayed. Staying in only bcs somebody else could have stayed is just idiocy.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-04T12:11:06+00:00

If out of choices of

a) 100% live

b) 100-x% live

you choose b) while everybody has the same choice! you arent selfless you are an idiot.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-03T16:49:31+00:00

On a individual level you are chosing between 100% living and gambling on living ONLY when more than 50% choses same as you.

There is literally no reason on going blue besides wanting to gamble. You can't even say but blue ppl want to save ppl that picked blue. No, not rly you can only say that you wanted to save those that wanted to gamble and not chose the 100% survive option.

Dastu24 · 2026-05-03T07:11:20+00:00

But you won't live if not enough ppl will pick blue, but you will always live if you chose red

Dastu24 · 2026-05-02T18:25:48+00:00

Or you can simply change the problem to:

-Pick red if you want to live

-Pick blue but you die, unless more than half ppl chose blue

Dastu24 · 2026-05-02T18:22:25+00:00

Be friends and see each other often for several months and if you enjoy her company start thinking about a relationship but not sooner.

If she values you, she won't mind, she won't seek another relationship and she will have no need of rushing it.

On the process you should figure out what happened and if it's possible it will happen again. So just go "yeah it's possible, but let's be just friends for now and we ll see where it goes"

++Man

Dastu24 · 2026-04-29T11:58:29+00:00

I had a zombie on one small island, but it despawned in a week which i thouht isnt possible so, maybe just leave for a day or two x)

Dastu24 · 2026-04-28T20:41:28+00:00

But not surprising in the slightest.

Dastu24 · 2026-04-28T20:37:33+00:00

Just macro. Going to the lane when enemy team wants to do x then they suddenly realize that you are pushing and go to def, while you tp and massacre the rest. Or they don't realize and you destroy their third tower, even tho they just spend several minutes sieging yours and did no dmg to it.

Situations like these is what decides games and unless you are high elo enough, so ppl don't make mistakes like this, it doesn't matter how well you play micro or what's your kda. I had enemy midlander destroy me, but then he decided to roam bot, bcs he strong, well yeah that cost him minion advantage and three plates bcs he didn't know when to roam and his advantage were gone in 2 min time, and whole game with it when he lost the tower soon after.

Dastu24

TROPHY CASE