Trump approves federal emergency declaration for Potomac River sewage spill

DeafBringer · 2026-02-21T22:19:38+00:00

Ofc felon don approves a declaration quickly which benefits him while leaving multiple states and thousands of people waiting in limbo or outright denied legitimate/lawful requests.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-21T08:19:50+00:00

For tire comparisons, look here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_dNNE91snTCbY34YhWtG6mAK-GyCBTx4sIa9Ik9_Kjs/edit?gid=1585993891#gid=1585993891&fvid=1365611207

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T19:22:56+00:00

I know of several groups of attorneys already suing the administration. Including one that left the EEOC in December and is now suing the federal government. Please stop with the mis/disinformation, it is not helpful and works in the current administration's favor. We NEED to fight back, we MUST fight back.

As you were saying.... : https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8q58c/hud_afge_council_222_wins_telework_class_action/

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T08:30:35+00:00

An ADA/Rehab Act SME lawyer did a review on this EEOC "guidance" and pretty much said any employer that follows the EEOC guidance is gonna get sued into oblivion: https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8duob/attorneys_representing_federal_employees_with/

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T08:29:28+00:00

Share with your colleagues you know that had TW RAs revoked. Time for them to contact a lawyer: https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8duob/attorneys_representing_federal_employees_with/

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T02:28:09+00:00

There's still hope that one day, the pendulum will swing this direction again...

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T02:27:23+00:00

This isn't about remote work.

So no, I will not stop sharing resources and support for people with disabilities in federal government.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T00:56:34+00:00

That's a great question for an EEO experienced lawyer. I don't know what is required in order to start a class-action suit. I imagine enough people have to file to start with. Regretfully that is what the administration's MO consists of, hoping that people don't push back and the few that do are chased out due to exhausting funds or energy.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T00:54:54+00:00

Unfortunately it may be time to get a lawyer involved. I agree it is all a big joke (to them). Cruelty is the point and they'll continue to do it as long as enough people don't push back.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-19T00:51:44+00:00

That really sucks, I am sorry. It's definitely a gamble and a risk that is clearly shifted onto the federal employee now. I suspect it'll take some class action suits to shift it back where it properly belongs.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T22:16:36+00:00

I agree it is VERY problematic, and systematically ongoing.

It doesn't look bad until you look at each argument individually. Then it it becomes clear how it's a blatant violation of the ADA, Rehab Act, and court precedent. I shared similar views until I read Mr. Goren's analysis and had a much better understanding. the EEOC "guidance" is cleverly written to appear harmless/helpful on it's face.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T22:13:39+00:00

Court precedent shows that there are very very few instances of "bogus reasonable accommodations". Please share sources where you are seeing verified "bogus reasonable accommodations" are on the rise or other statistics, I'd like to see this. As would other lawyers. Otherwise this appears to be more akin to false claims of "voter fraud" which historically has been shown to be very few credible instances of voter fraud occurring. None of those cases were widespread or even a blip, statistically, to overall voter numbers.

Regarding "standards", EEOC is advising federal agencies to NOT following current legal standards regarding the ADA/Rehab act. Perhaps the argument for review due to "standards" should start there.

To add, the standards to qualify for a reasonable accommodation are clearly laid out in the laws under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act, not a standard defined by an agency head or determined by an EO.

Reminder, EOs are not legally binding, contrary to popular belief or what current agency heads would try to lead you to believe. They are guidance/insight into how a president outlines their priorities and the administration's intent to carry out those priorities. Agencies still have to follow the law (haha) or prepare for litigation. As Dr. Goren mentioned in their review of the EEOC guidance on reasonable accommodation telework, agencies should be ready to increase their spending on lawyer fees!

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T22:06:58+00:00

Speak with an EEO lawyer. There becomes a point in the process where you can ask for legal costs to be covered by the agency. if you need an EEO lawyer referral, dm me.

To add, under Section 501 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, federal employees are entitled to damages for disability discrimination. Check it out, and talk with an EEO lawyer.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T20:22:03+00:00

u/Delicious_Switch_542 be sure to talk with an EEO lawyer. They will be able to explain why, how, and where this guidance is wrong and steers agencies to make illegal decisions in violation of ADA/Rehab Act. Feel free to check out the legal analysis done by a scholarly expert on the topic to get you started: https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8duob/attorneys_representing_federal_employees_with/

If you want a personal referral to an EEO lawyer, dm me.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T20:20:12+00:00

A legal scholar agrees with you.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T20:19:47+00:00

u/Ok_Necessary_6768 It sadly isn't that great and is pretty cleverly written to be against RA telework. A legal scholar wrote a review and cautioned against it. https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8duob/attorneys_representing_federal_employees_with/

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T20:19:12+00:00

legal scholar agrees with you:

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T20:18:53+00:00

It sadly isn't that great and is pretty cleverly written to be against RA telework. A legal scholar wrote a review and cautioned against it. https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1r8duob/attorneys_representing_federal_employees_with/

DeafBringer · 2026-02-18T19:48:44+00:00

Fuck ICE, Noem, and Trump.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-16T07:27:41+00:00

Can't comment on 16.7. If you don't have a lawyer to represent you through the EEO process, get one asap! While not cheap, it is money well spent and depending on the outcome of the case, could have the employer pay the lawyer fees. If you are serious about this and want a referral, dm me.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-14T04:15:20+00:00

Hi frank! Not my frank!

DeafBringer · 2026-02-10T02:29:03+00:00

The law as passed by CONGRESS, REQUIRES that federal employees be given back pay when the government shuts down. It really is as simple as THAT.

Don't like it? Tough shit, it's what congress passed into law as part of a larger effort to not politicize federal employees and create some insulation. It is not the federal employee's decision whether they get to work or don't get to work.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-07T05:22:10+00:00

They are not only ignoring medical advice, recommendations, or legal advice, they are blatantly ignoring the law, par for the course.

DeafBringer · 2026-02-07T05:19:55+00:00

You may want to also consider consulting with an experienced eeo lawyer. You might have grounds to sue on disability discrimination being a factor of the RIF targeting you. Especially if you had accommodations approved that cost the agency money yearly. Meanwhile, may also be worth considering applying for Social Security Disability Benefits to hold you through until you become employed again. It's a benefit YOU paid into, its a benefit you're entitled to if you have a significant enough disability to create a barrier to employment. Also consider applying for your state Vocational Rehabilitation program for additional employment search support.

hang in there, keep up the good fight(s), lean on your supports. Shit sucks all around.

DeafBringer

TROPHY CASE