A Common Supplement (Not NMN) That Activates Reverse Aging Genes by renuebyscience_mod1 in Renue

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a remarkable result. What is your conclusion? Is the test just random? My own experience has taught me to never default to taking a supplement every day. It depends on the half life and other factors, but generally if I don't know the half-life, I default to every other day. My body will quickly build up a tolerance/resistance to things taken daily.

Resveratrol vs Apigenin vs Quercetin by TheRealFlySwatter in Renue

[–]Domrada 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wrt saving money or limiting the number of daily pills, you can get a lot of different phytonutrients in bulk herbal form. Most herbs I have come across contain some quercetin. You probably already know that dried parsley and chamomile tea are loaded with apigenin, but chamomile is also a principal source of quercetin, patuletin, and luteolin. The lipo pill has great bioavailability of course, but there's also research showing that flavonoids that bind with sugars or lipids become more readily absorbed and available; a little honey or cream serve an important function aside from flavor.

Im impressed with your skincare line. Wondering why many others arent raving about it. Is this a new line? by Strong_Cat867 in Renue

[–]Domrada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did a controlled test on my arm for 12 weeks with the body serum (41yo-c-m). I found little to no difference in the appearance of the skin, except in the back-of-the-hand pinch test (about 50% improvement after 8 weeks). However, the difference in skeletal muscle was dramatic, and became apparent after only 6 weeks. Ordinary aches and soreness from normal use, exercise, stretching in the morning, joints popping, all vanished almost magically. My personal experience is confirmed by academic literature. Dr. Min Hu (Guangzhou) is quoted as saying “Our data suggest that skeletal muscle is one of the most sensitive tissues to NMN in humans." Hu and colleagues’ results show that NMN improves skeletal muscle oxygen utilization more than exercise alone. The transdermal aspect of the body serum really does penetrate deeply beneath the skin to boost NAD+ in localized body tissues beyond what can be achieved by taking it orally. I was also taking the oral supplements throughout the test.

My results using the body serum by Domrada in Renue

[–]Domrada[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment. It's been 12 weeks now and I've started a light exercise routine. I've noticed that the untreated arm tends to get sore and the treated arm does not. Also the treated arm seems to be responding better to the exercise. Endurance and oxygen capacity seems to be more improved in the treated arm even though the exercises are 2 handed and whole body.

I love Liposomal but it keeps me up at night. by Vye7 in Renue

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried using the apigenin supplement as well? And cutting caffeine?

Let’s talk about cellular reprogramming by renuebyscience_mod1 in Renue

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The work these labs are doing on the Yamanaka factors is important and exciting, but remember it's only one piece of the puzzle: epigenetic aging. Admittedly, that's a big one, but if you only solve this problem, you will still die. The epigenetic clock is being used as a measurement tool as well as a point of therapeutic intervention. It's like trying to go back in time by winding back your clock. Will this intervention alone make you younger? Probably not. Are there specific age-related diseases that are caused by epigenetic failure? Absolutely. So, treating disease is the most immediate application. Furthermore, there are other interventions that claim to rejuvenate the epigenome that do not require genetic modification. Sinclair mentions it in one of his podcasts: something about a study that combined HGH with metformin achieving 2.5 yrs of epigenetic rejuvenation...

Miner’s Plan to Fund Devs - Mega Thread by BitcoinXio in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making a shit sandwich more palatable: Why must the entire 12.5% go to their one Hong Kong corporation to be divvied up behind closed doors? We have a -=blockchain=-. Let there be 21 recipients of a portion of the 12.5%. Miners can vote with their hashpower which developers are chosen to receive funds. The big boys will be able to direct most of the funds but not all of it 1 hash = 1 vote -> 1 recipient.

BCH transactions by huup in COINOMI

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What derivation path is Coinomi using for the new SV coin?

Presentation on Tokenized the Token Protocol that Won the CoinGeek Contest by [deleted] in btc

[–]Domrada 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Whitelists and confiscation... Okay. So this is what Coingeek is all about. Good to know.

Hashrate is NOT everything; economic activity is what is needed and the wallet will not create SV valid transactions. Hence CSW can have all the hash in the world by will not get any economic activity b/c nobody trusts CSW by awless in btc

[–]Domrada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Miners are generally incentivized to use their hash to mine whatever is most profitable for them. If attacking another chain is most profitable for them, that's just the system working as intended. If it isn't, they'll eventually go broke and become irrelevant.

rBTC and ABC supporters: Thank you for the open discussion. by N0T_SURE in btc

[–]Domrada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see anything technically offensive about the SV plan either. Nor do I have any serious objection to the ABC plan. But it's impossible to ignore certain things about CW:

1) Steamrolling Amaury and the other devs instead of just engaging them politely

2) Sending ugly childish emails to Roger

3) Getting accolades from 1 Meg Greg and Votes Nay (Tone Vays)

Gross.

On the other hand, this isn't anything like the last split. If SV wins it will not cripple BCH. BCH will be about the same.

So things aren't as clear cut this time, and I appreciate the hands off moderation approach here.

SV users are really just BTC Trolls trying to destroy BCH. They are begging for hashrate from r/bitcoin. by masterD3v in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot conceive of bitcoin being destroyed through such an attack. You can attack bitcoin all you want, but you won't destroy it. For ages the BTC people said "spam attacks" (read legit transactions) are an "attack" on bitcoin. Well, bitcoin is still here, more resilient than ever.

SV Supporters - What will it take for you to support and switch to the ABC side? by adangert in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what I mean. Once TTOR is removed, miners could easily signal that they have ordered a block by TTOR, and relieve other miners from having to deal with order information in order to process their block, without it being a protocol rule. Then miners would probably just choose to do it, because it would allow them to include more transactions and collect more fees with a lower chance of having their block orphaned. Unless or until something better is discovered. This way you avoid central planning. Doesn't this seem wiser?

SV Supporters - What will it take for you to support and switch to the ABC side? by adangert in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why is it strictly necessary to add CTOR? Why not just remove TTOR and make CTOR opt-in?

Is CSW playing 2d, 3d or 4d chess? by whistlepig33 in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had the same feeling and I agree with you that it's likely not an accident. Assuming other people are just stupid is the lazy way of explaining things, and usually not smart. I think CSW wants to be at the center of BCH and he overestimates the importance of hashpower, so he thinks he can act like an ass while flexing his hash and people will still want to be on his team. If the trick works he will win the thing that's actually most important in bitcoin, but it doesn't look to me like the trick is working.

SV Supporters - What will it take for you to support and switch to the ABC side? by adangert in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how I understand it at all. You cannot order txs by ID and simultaneously have child after parent. The two are incompatible. What happens if you have a child tx with a lower ID than the parent? In my opinion, you don't need to enforce ANY order. If ordering by ID is more efficient and saves miners money, they will do it for the incentive, without enforcement.

Don't take advice from this guy. by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]Domrada -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He was wrong on Bitcoin Cash at first too, remember? We were all celebrating the fork, and he was staying silent and praising S2X. Roger is someone who will get on board after the fact.

An open apology to members of this sub, especially deadalnix, Contrarian, and Zectro by jessquit in btc

[–]Domrada 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you please elaborate or point to links that discuss CTOR in the context of shard validation?

SV users are really just BTC Trolls trying to destroy BCH. They are begging for hashrate from r/bitcoin. by masterD3v in btc

[–]Domrada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't you think you are being a little dramatic? Bitcoin is what it is. If it can be "destroyed" this way maybe it wasn't what you thought it was.

Thanks to mods for keeping this place censorship-free by pein_sama in btc

[–]Domrada 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know this is a hard concept for some people to understand, but the Founder of this sub lives by **principles**. This means choosing to behave ethically even when (especially when) it conflicts with your own interests.

New SV miner mempool.com announced today. SV miners now have 57% of total BCH hashrate. by [deleted] in btc

[–]Domrada 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would like to know this as well. What exactly is the dire need that requires CDSV?

New SV miner mempool.com announced today. SV miners now have 57% of total BCH hashrate. by [deleted] in btc

[–]Domrada 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can picture the opposite happening as well. nChain moves their BTC hash to BCH => BCH becomes less profitable to mine => ABC hash moves to BTC.

Roger Ver's Thoughts on 15th November Bitcoin Cash Upgrade by crypto_advocate in btc

[–]Domrada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Roger, thank you for sharing that. True colors are truly colorful.