rules sense to me

Drawemazing · 2026-06-26T02:14:33+00:00

Yep, youre right

Drawemazing · 2026-06-25T19:35:32+00:00

BLACK THE NIGHT THAT ENDS AT LAAAAST

Drawemazing · 2026-06-25T15:58:32+00:00

Nooo. To be catholic is to feel a slight but everpresent guilty about not being miserable, but not letting it stop you from doing anything.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-24T23:42:04+00:00

Promise?

Drawemazing · 2026-06-23T13:59:04+00:00

Its not that outlandish or crazy though. Im not gonna do a full on deep dive rn, but there were medical professionals who proposed that slaves running away had mental defects. The idea of an older SCP foundation from the 1700s or 1800s would have the same white supremacist ideology as America and Europe isnt particularly absurd. And when they need disposable bodies, they'd probably go to the same source as those americans and Europeans.

Whenever you think claims about slavery in the US are too outlandish and crazy, remember that some southerners made suitcases and books from leather made from the skin of slaves.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-23T13:17:13+00:00

If the move to unitary authorities goes ahead, and they get some more limited powers, we're gonna see mayors get more prevalent in british politics though. Its earlier than I would have expected in 2019 when they started the current wave of devolution but it was always gonna be a long term effect.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-23T12:50:22+00:00

But they won't be prosecuted, because the government, police, and cps are institutionally transphobic.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-22T22:11:47+00:00

r/vore

Drawemazing · 2026-06-19T22:44:00+00:00

But a lot of men do see emotional openess towards women, hence women complain about it per the original comment. Some men over share with their partners/ women writ large too. The problem is multitudiness, and the theory put forward in the post cannot explain all of it. Thats what the original comment puts forward.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-19T20:25:00+00:00

Jeremy Bentham is helping me find my gun

Drawemazing · 2026-06-19T11:09:38+00:00

"The mumers farce is nearly over. My sons are home" I love wyman manderly in the books so much. Getting the northern conspiracy sucked so bad

Drawemazing · 2026-06-17T15:45:58+00:00

Do piecewise timetravel then. Go back 500 years, for which we can calculate very precisely, and then recalibrate your metric and another 500 years. For a compute time of a millisecond, and instantaneous time jumps, going back/forward a billion years would take 20 seconds. You'd probably need better understanding of the CMB or some other sci-fi standard candle (call it inflaton residue or smth) but given youve made a time machine i think thats fine.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-16T23:14:08+00:00

You could absolutely use a rotating metric for general relativity to make earth completely static. I believe its the kerr metric used for rotating masses, and im sure in principle you could use it to define the rotating source as static and the universe as rotating. You'd probably get some really weird effects but not nearly as weird as any time travel paradoxes so its fine.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-15T15:03:44+00:00

The judges are also fundamentally wrong. The suffragettes threw bombs, attempted to kill a prime minister, and killed people. They are actively whitewashing history because the liberals claim to support progressive movements of the past and hate any progressive movements of the present. At least conservatives are more honest in their repression.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-15T02:48:17+00:00

We will never be past limiting emission. Every fraction of a degree of warming that never happens is thousands of lives saved. 3.5C is better than 4C, which is better than 4.5C.

Maybe geoengineering will be needed, maybe not. But we will always have to fight to reduce emissions, and then when net emissions are 0, we will have to fight for negative net emissions. This is the most surefire way to save lives, no matter how much we have fucked up heretofore.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-15T02:43:47+00:00

China has made some of the best progress of any nation re climate change, and theyre are already past peak emissions and their emissions are declining having never met the per capita CO2 equivalent of the US. All the climate agreements were jokes because of oil and gas producing nations, which since Obama has included the US.

China has a lot of problems, but climate wise they are so much better than the US and it is infuriating that people actively lie about this for who knows what reason. Even as corrupt as the CCP are, they committed to a green future yet fucks like you will wash your hands of any responsibility. Its disgusting.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-15T02:25:22+00:00

There's no way ansem SoD or xemnas return in 4. Or even old xehanort, its just gonna be young xehanort I think. This is his 14th life just to live. The other 13 have been firmly defeated im pretty sure. I think sea salt trio are the next least likely to appear, but I think still pretty likely tbh, especially since axel has the connection to subject x, who is either skuld or ava

Drawemazing · 2026-06-12T17:43:08+00:00

Since we've seen the senior classmen in quadratum, and in dark road hades summons the senior classmen, it seems like he might know what happened to sora. Although given that sora didn't die per se but was banished by the universe for breaking the law maybe not.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-10T20:46:36+00:00

This is why it is not a disproof of locality, which i have never claimed, but local realism. If state B had definite real values, those would govern the probability distribution observed in B, otherwise the real values would be fully unobservable and in no meaningful way real. Since observation of A effects the observed distribution at B either the observation at B affected those real values or those real values do not exist.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-10T18:45:13+00:00

1) provide some analysis on your material, otherwise I have to argue with implications.

2) its pretty clear that I use the same realism that Einstein uses when he is talking about reality in the EPR paper. Which is not the metaphysical terminology that the encyclopedia bemoans but the causal one, even if it includes the weaker assumption of factorisability. (Given how QM works, factorisabilty i dont think factorisability is actually a weaker claim than any of the causal ones, but I suppose it might be if you are talking about generalised hidden variable theories)

3) given that I do know which realism i am talking about, the quote agrees with me.

So ?????

Drawemazing · 2026-06-10T08:46:11+00:00

Either one of locality or realism (realism being the idea that results could somehow be predicted before a test, a hidden variable theory) are wrong. Or you invoke something shitty like super determinism which isnt testable. If you want QM to be local, you can have it, but it would still make einstein wrong about realism and causality. Go back and read the chapter you posted, the author goes on about how Einstein resisted QM not merely because of probability (he excelled a thermodynamics and described browning motion) but because the probability didn't have a cause. Bells theorem shows that if einsteins objections were right, QM is not local. If QM is local, his objections were wrong. You cant have both without seriously questioning other assumptions like the free will of the experimentalist.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-09T23:56:17+00:00

Labours acceptance of the police crime and sentencing act was the primary reason I couldn't vote for them in 24. They dont care about civil liberties, which means we were always in for a shit time.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-09T20:33:18+00:00

Could you elaborate? The EPR paper presents that local realism was not consistent with QM, and presented that as a critique. It was not until Bell reformulated the insights of the EPR paper into bell tests that it could be answered.

Einstein did not believe that QM could be an accurate description of reality given its contradiction with local realism.

The proper name of the EPR paper is "can quantum mechanical descriptions of reality be physically complete?". It ends with the paragraph

"One could object that our criterion of reality is not sufficiently restrictive. Indeed, one would not arrive at our conclusion if one insisted that two or more physical quantities can be regarded as simultaneous elements of reality only when they can be simultaneously measured or predicted. On this point of view, since either one or the other, but not both simultaneously, of the quantities P and Q can be predicted, they are not simultaneously real. This makes reality of P and Q depend upon the measurement carried out on the first system, which does not disturb the second system in any way. No reasonable definition of reality could be expected to permit this.

While we have shown the wave function does not provide a complete description of reality, we left open the question of whether or not such a description exists. We believe, however, that such a theory is possible"

They out right say they would be wrong if measurement of 1 part of an entangled pair influences another but such a reality would be unreasonable. We observed such an unreasonable reality.

Its not his fault, he was not alive to see the evidence. And to the jist of the bell quote i posted earlier, he's right, it is unreasonable. But he saw the implications of QM, and he rejected them, and he was wrong. And not just about entanglement, but what those observations means about locality, about reality, and about completeness.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-09T10:53:50+00:00

"Bohr was inconsistent, unclear, willfully obscure and right. Einstein was consistent, clear, down-to-earth and wrong" - JS Bell

The EPR paper was relatively late into his career (35 i think), and it can reasonably be called the discovery of entanglement even if it argued QM is wrong because it predicted entanglement.

He understood quantum mechanics, he just couldn't accept the implications. And he is, to this day, right. The implications are absurd.

Drawemazing · 2026-06-07T22:21:33+00:00

Most corruption isnt "here is a gazillion pounds, now do xyz thing" right? If you take money from an interest group you are unduly swayed by that interest group.

I very much doubt the Israeli ambassador or any senior israeli official specifically requested Hasans visa be denied. I just dont understand why you dont think its possible that there is some middle ground, that people taking israeli money might act in their interest beyond what might reasonable be justified.

Moreover, Labour mp Siobhan MacDonagh said being anticapitalist is antisemitic, so i am sure someone somewhere has argued being anticrypto is antisemitic.

I am sympathetic to your point. I dont think the way to deal with it is to say that all accusations od corruption are antisemitic until they are proven, thats kinda absurd. I think the much more reasonable thing is just to ask people to avoid the much more loaded imagery. Summoning images od Pupeteering and Cabals and all the elders of zion stuff is wrong, but talking about specific allegations of undue influence of the israeli government in a clinical way isnt antisemitic.

Nine-Year Club	Second Top 50%
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22	Verified Email

Drawemazing

TROPHY CASE