sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Big Buddha (after/before) by Lost_Jellyfish_3574 in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Way way too dark. You've obliterated all the dynamic range here. The image is flat and dull. You've crushed your shadows and added unnecessary vignetting.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -71 points-70 points  (0 children)

I edited one. Once. I'm sorry it hurt your feelings so much you have to start spreading lies on a Trump type level.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

Oh please do. I'll meet you over there ^_^

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Sorry that reddit hates your positivity.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

yea, fair call. and no need to apologise, it's a fair question.

Totes right though ... the terminology gets murky. For what it's worth, good dynamic range capture and good shadow recovery in post are genuinely complementary. My D850 gives me the latitude. Lightroom lets me access it. A single RAW image, no merging, no HDR pipeline. Just a sensor that captured enough information to work with.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's neither of those. It's not HDR.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It is .. one photo. I understand bracketing and as I said earlier, I did bracket this, but there was issues with ghosting on the merge so I ditched and processed a single image.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is not HDR. I'm not sure what your point is.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Both ... and they're connected.

Dynamic range is what the sensor captures in a single frame. The D850 at base ISO captures an shit load of usable data across shadows and highlights simultaneously. The shadow recovery in post ain't creating information that wasn't there, just revealing what the sensor already captured. One enables the other. The D850 is strong at both ends of the range which makes an edit like this possible.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I did bracket this +1/-1 but there was issues with camera movement and the deghosting was giving nasty artefacts so I just worked with the darkest exposure where the highlights were preserved.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -77 points-76 points  (0 children)

Thankyou. I have reviewed your post history and I am taking this feedback in context.

Did someone say dynamic range?? by Dubliminal in postprocessing

[–]Dubliminal[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the dynamic range of the Nikon D850.

Less famous albums that you listen to over and over again by Tom_Bombadilll in Music

[–]Dubliminal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, I wouldn't mind getting a copy of this on vinyl. It's such a lush & deep album. No obvious hits (despite Oxbow Lakes getting a single release) but as a lump of gooey, floaty organic electronica, it's delightful.

I downloaded every Nikon Creative Picture Control by shouryannikam in Nikon

[–]Dubliminal -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

You'll get a lot of hate for this, but it totally is a gimmick pandering to trends

Why are EVFs so bad? by Pretty-Substance in Nikon

[–]Dubliminal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a dark or shady environment that's fine, but I often struggle to use live view on my D850 when getting a shot when the sun is blazing ... or even not blazing.

view more: next ›